Patty isn`t Paranormal!

This is a Soap Box section of our Forum where those who hold passionate views/opinions regarding various aspects of Theology, Creation, Religion, Paranormal etc - pertaining to the Yowie can be POLITELY debated, away from our mainstream friendly Yowie / Bigfoot Discussion Board.

Be kind to each other. Our standard rules of etiquette and behaviour apply in all areas of our Forum.
Post Reply
Greg W C Sims
Approved Member
Posts: 16
Joined: Wed Jan 29, 2014 9:09 am

Patty isn`t Paranormal!

Unread post by Greg W C Sims » Thu Mar 04, 2021 10:34 am

Scratching an itch that`s been irritating me for a long time.
Why isn`t Patty from the Patterson & Gimlin footage showing
any signs of paranormal activity?
There is :- No gliding or hovering(floating) movements.
No cloaking or vanishing into thin air.
No super human speed shown.
No infrasound or signs of the humans being "Zapped".
No wood knocks,whistles,growls or whoops from other clan members.
No rocks or sticks being thrown or branches snapping or trees being
pushed over by other clan members.
IF this footage is legit,it seems to me that Patty is showing NO signs at all at trying to avoid the humans filming her
when we all know that is supposed to be the golden rule for Yowie/Sasquatch behaviour,DON`T LET THE HUMANS SEE YOU!
Countless reports tell of the completely opposite behaviours,as mentioned above!

Feedback & thoughts would be much appreciated!

User avatar
sensesonfire
Long Time Contributor
Posts: 873
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2013 12:08 pm
Position: Paranormal Researcher
Location: Western Australia

Re: Patty isn`t Paranormal!

Unread post by sensesonfire » Thu Mar 04, 2021 11:45 am

Greg W C Sims wrote:
Thu Mar 04, 2021 10:34 am
IF this footage is legit,it seems to me that Patty is showing NO signs at all at trying to avoid the humans filming her
when we all know that is supposed to be the golden rule for Yowie/Sasquatch behaviour,DON`T LET THE HUMANS SEE YOU!
Countless reports tell of the completely opposite behaviours,as mentioned above!


Hi Greg, the one thing that amazed me with that Patty image was the clarity of the film compared to all the hazy ambiguous images that are presented right up to the present day.

I personally don't think they are overly concerned if humans do see them certainly not in present times. There are reports where Bigfoot have revealed themselves to humans and plenty of information of them disappearing in front of their eyes. There are even accounts of Sasquatch communicating even by telepathy. An incident occurred when a guy was out with a camera and chanced upon a Bigfoot family the large male told him if he took a photo you're dead.

Their paranormal abilities are not on display 24/7 only when they choose to do so.
The human mind is only constrained by the barricades we build around it.

User avatar
rowbe
Silver Status
Posts: 127
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2018 3:13 pm
Position: Researcher
Location: SE QLD

Re: Patty isn`t Paranormal!

Unread post by rowbe » Thu Mar 04, 2021 12:55 pm

Just to add to the controversy, see:
https://www.isu.edu/media/libraries/rhi ... _final.pdf

Not sure if the film is genuine. There was something I read ages ago that inferred Patty was walking away from the guys towards the far end of the forest in an attempt to lure their sight away from something (e.g. she had young in the area).

Maybe young don't have fine tuned paranormal abilities??

User avatar
adventurer
Gold Status - Frequent Poster
Posts: 340
Joined: Sun May 08, 2016 9:43 am
Position: New Member
Gender: Female
Location: elimbah north brisbane

Re: Patty isn`t Paranormal!

Unread post by adventurer » Thu Mar 04, 2021 5:54 pm

Hi, there have been countless stories of bigfoot being seen in " Physical form", at creek beds, crossing in front of cars on tracks and roads, up in trees, even finding footprints. BUT those who have followed such creatures all noticed they are not what they thought they are, stories stated the hairee all of a sudden just dissapeared in front of them or the hairy jumped tree to tree without the branches possibly being able to hold there weight. If Patty was real , she was far enough away knowing if needed can use her abilities at any time.She didnt walk toward them, she was crossing a field walking away.

Thecreeper
Silver Status
Posts: 106
Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2018 9:37 pm
Position: Believer

Re: Patty isn`t Paranormal!

Unread post by Thecreeper » Thu Mar 04, 2021 8:54 pm

rowbe wrote:
Thu Mar 04, 2021 12:55 pm
Just to add to the controversy, see:
https://www.isu.edu/media/libraries/rhi ... _final.pdf

Not sure if the film is genuine. There was something I read ages ago that inferred Patty was walking away from the guys towards the far end of the forest in an attempt to lure their sight away from something (e.g. she had young in the area).

Maybe young don't have fine tuned paranormal abilities??
Hey mate yer i remember reading something about her maybe trying to lead them away from something and im sure something was mentioned about more being seen

Also it might be silly but is there a chance it wasnt all blurry and stuff coz it was a old school camera and tape
Could the bigfoot affect recordings with infrasound or some other ability

As iv said befor last year when i was bluff charged that morning i turned the gopro on when it all started happening and recorded for 20mins and its still to this day the only recording or pic iv had come up currupt and wont work no matter what i do it even says it goes for 20m but wont work and the file is 0mb but still takes up 20m of recording on my gopro lol
As iv said befor i had some stuff going on when it all happened and all i can put it down to is infrasound

User avatar
sensesonfire
Long Time Contributor
Posts: 873
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2013 12:08 pm
Position: Paranormal Researcher
Location: Western Australia

Re: Patty isn`t Paranormal!

Unread post by sensesonfire » Fri Mar 05, 2021 1:10 pm

adventurer wrote:
Thu Mar 04, 2021 5:54 pm
the hairy jumped tree to tree without the branches possibly being able to hold there weight.
Hi adventurer, I watched an episode of Finding Bigfoot. A Native American woman showed the crew a tree where she saw a 700 kilo Bigfoot (Matt Moneymaker's estimation) standing on a thin branch looking down at her with glowing green eyes. Finding Bigfoot crew were puzzled as to how the tree branch could support the weight of such a creature.
The human mind is only constrained by the barricades we build around it.

User avatar
adventurer
Gold Status - Frequent Poster
Posts: 340
Joined: Sun May 08, 2016 9:43 am
Position: New Member
Gender: Female
Location: elimbah north brisbane

Re: Patty isn`t Paranormal!

Unread post by adventurer » Fri Mar 05, 2021 3:17 pm

sensesonfire wrote:
Fri Mar 05, 2021 1:10 pm
adventurer wrote:
Thu Mar 04, 2021 5:54 pm
the hairy jumped tree to tree without the branches possibly being able to hold there weight.
Hi adventurer, I watched an episode of Finding Bigfoot. A Native American woman showed the crew a tree where she saw a 700 kilo Bigfoot (Matt Moneymaker's estimation) standing on a thin branch looking down at her with glowing green eyes. Finding Bigfoot crew were puzzled as to how the tree branch could support the weight of such a creature.
Hey Senses, yes, iv read a lot of stories with them in the trees. A close friend of mine saw them walking up in the tree tops, she had described it as Johnny Walker the way it walked. Have attached 2 other stories.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

User avatar
adventurer
Gold Status - Frequent Poster
Posts: 340
Joined: Sun May 08, 2016 9:43 am
Position: New Member
Gender: Female
Location: elimbah north brisbane

Re: Patty isn`t Paranormal!

Unread post by adventurer » Fri Mar 05, 2021 3:26 pm

Went for a bigfoot watch few nights back and all i saw was orbs, i went there because a man stated he saw a big hairy running through the area.Prob should be in the orb ghost section????
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

User avatar
sensesonfire
Long Time Contributor
Posts: 873
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2013 12:08 pm
Position: Paranormal Researcher
Location: Western Australia

Re: Patty isn`t Paranormal!

Unread post by sensesonfire » Sat Mar 06, 2021 11:42 am

Hey adventurer,

Those orb pics are amazing you don't get too many people that are able to provide images like that. It appears Yowies definitely have an affinity with you.

If those stories can't convince people that these creatures are far more than just flesh and blood then I don't know what will. (woot)
The human mind is only constrained by the barricades we build around it.

Thecreeper
Silver Status
Posts: 106
Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2018 9:37 pm
Position: Believer

Re: Patty isn`t Paranormal!

Unread post by Thecreeper » Sat Mar 06, 2021 12:46 pm

If u zoom in on the 2nd orb it deadset looks like it has a face.... freaky

gregvalentine
Gold Status - Frequent Poster
Posts: 401
Joined: Fri Sep 23, 2016 7:42 pm
Position: Skeptic
Gender: Not Telling

Re: Patty isn`t Paranormal!

Unread post by gregvalentine » Sat Mar 06, 2021 8:17 pm

adventurer wrote:
Fri Mar 05, 2021 3:26 pm
Went for a bigfoot watch few nights back and all i saw was orbs, i went there because a man stated he saw a big hairy running through the area.Prob should be in the orb ghost section????
Are these images dated 1.1.2019 supposedly taken a "few nights back" or is this something else ?

Thecreeper
Silver Status
Posts: 106
Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2018 9:37 pm
Position: Believer

Re: Patty isn`t Paranormal!

Unread post by Thecreeper » Sat Mar 06, 2021 9:35 pm

Hey mate iv got a camera that every time i set the date the next day its back to the same date only the time changes

No matter when they are from there awesome pics

User avatar
adventurer
Gold Status - Frequent Poster
Posts: 340
Joined: Sun May 08, 2016 9:43 am
Position: New Member
Gender: Female
Location: elimbah north brisbane

Re: Patty isn`t Paranormal!

Unread post by adventurer » Sun Mar 07, 2021 2:33 pm

gregvalentine wrote:
Sat Mar 06, 2021 8:17 pm
adventurer wrote:
Fri Mar 05, 2021 3:26 pm
Went for a bigfoot watch few nights back and all i saw was orbs, i went there because a man stated he saw a big hairy running through the area.Prob should be in the orb ghost section????
Are these images dated 1.1.2019 supposedly taken a "few nights back" or is this something else ?
Hi, yes dont look at my camera dates. It takes far to long to set the dates and times on all my equipment when i get out of the car, so i just leave them. As Creeper said the dates dont keep up to date, each time you use them u have to set them again. So yes it was several nights ago this footage was taken. Thanks.I have a great video i took but says files to large to download. Dee

Thecreeper
Silver Status
Posts: 106
Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2018 9:37 pm
Position: Believer

Re: Patty isn`t Paranormal!

Unread post by Thecreeper » Sun Mar 07, 2021 5:14 pm

Oh really spewing!! That would be heaps cool to see

User avatar
adventurer
Gold Status - Frequent Poster
Posts: 340
Joined: Sun May 08, 2016 9:43 am
Position: New Member
Gender: Female
Location: elimbah north brisbane

Re: Patty isn`t Paranormal!

Unread post by adventurer » Sun Mar 07, 2021 5:37 pm

Thecreeper wrote:
Sun Mar 07, 2021 5:14 pm
Oh really spewing!! That would be heaps cool to see
Hi Creeper, i can put some more orb, ghostly pics in the orb section.Some are from a couple years back.Where i took the photos there has been plenty of yowie activity.

Thecreeper
Silver Status
Posts: 106
Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2018 9:37 pm
Position: Believer

Re: Patty isn`t Paranormal!

Unread post by Thecreeper » Sun Mar 07, 2021 5:42 pm

adventurer wrote:
Sun Mar 07, 2021 5:37 pm
Thecreeper wrote:
Sun Mar 07, 2021 5:14 pm
Oh really spewing!! That would be heaps cool to see
Hi Creeper, i can put some more orb, ghostly pics in the orb section.Some are from a couple years back.Where i took the photos there has been plenty of yowie activity.
Yer thats cool with all the stuff thats happened to me over the years that stuff creeps me out heaps more haha

User avatar
Bluedog
Silver Status
Posts: 236
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2018 8:24 am
Position: Believer

Re: Patty isn`t Paranormal!

Unread post by Bluedog » Thu Mar 11, 2021 3:52 pm

Greg W C Sims wrote:
Thu Mar 04, 2021 10:34 am
Scratching an itch that`s been irritating me for a long time.
Why isn`t Patty from the Patterson & Gimlin footage showing
any signs of paranormal activity?
There is :- No gliding or hovering(floating) movements.
No cloaking or vanishing into thin air.
No super human speed shown.
No infrasound or signs of the humans being "Zapped".
No wood knocks,whistles,growls or whoops from other clan members.
No rocks or sticks being thrown or branches snapping or trees being
pushed over by other clan members.
IF this footage is legit,it seems to me that Patty is showing NO signs at all at trying to avoid the humans filming her
when we all know that is supposed to be the golden rule for Yowie/Sasquatch behaviour,DON`T LET THE HUMANS SEE YOU!
Countless reports tell of the completely opposite behaviours,as mentioned above!

Feedback & thoughts would be much appreciated!
Patty
The more I learn, the less I know.

User avatar
Bluedog
Silver Status
Posts: 236
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2018 8:24 am
Position: Believer

Re: Patty isn`t Paranormal!

Unread post by Bluedog » Thu Mar 11, 2021 4:13 pm

Greg W C Sims wrote:
Thu Mar 04, 2021 10:34 am
Scratching an itch that`s been irritating me for a long time.
Why isn`t Patty from the Patterson & Gimlin footage showing
any signs of paranormal activity?
There is :- No gliding or hovering(floating) movements.
No cloaking or vanishing into thin air.
No super human speed shown.
No infrasound or signs of the humans being "Zapped".
No wood knocks,whistles,growls or whoops from other clan members.
No rocks or sticks being thrown or branches snapping or trees being
pushed over by other clan members.
IF this footage is legit,it seems to me that Patty is showing NO signs at all at trying to avoid the humans filming her
when we all know that is supposed to be the golden rule for Yowie/Sasquatch behaviour,DON`T LET THE HUMANS SEE YOU!
Countless reports tell of the completely opposite behaviours,as mentioned above!

Feedback & thoughts would be much appreciated!
I've watched this short film 100s of times.
What Roger Patterson and Bob Gimlin filmed on that Friday in 1967 is 100 % the real deal.
Bob Gimlin was there and has spent most
of his life suffering for it.
Your 100% right in what you say Greg, patty was IMO flesh and blood.
It's very hard to argue with the film.
Possibly we are dealing with different creatures /entities?
Maybe we are. I've been following the subject for the last 40 years and we are no closer to any sort of an answer.
IMO is exactly that my opinion!
The more I learn, the less I know.

Greg W C Sims
Approved Member
Posts: 16
Joined: Wed Jan 29, 2014 9:09 am

Re: Patty isn`t Paranormal!

Unread post by Greg W C Sims » Fri Mar 12, 2021 10:39 am

Thanks to everyone who responded to my post.

I suppose I`m just like most people in being so frustrated that we can get such clear footage
of this creature in 1967 with an old camera but cannot get anywhere near this quality footage with
todays technology. We have cameras that can zoom in from kilometers away,drones,dash & trail cams + nearly everyone
has a good quality camera in their pockets these days but still nothing as good as the Patty film,just doesn`t make sense to me!!!

It is the most fascinating topic in the world but with little to no reward!

User avatar
Searcher
Long Time Contributor
Posts: 812
Joined: Thu Mar 20, 2014 12:18 pm

Re: Patty isn`t Paranormal!

Unread post by Searcher » Fri Mar 12, 2021 4:09 pm

Hi Greg,

I agree with what you say about the old cameras! However, the picture resolution on 16mm film can be very good indeed. I still have the same model Kodak K-100 camera that was used to take those famous movies and have spoken about it before on AYR.

You can read about it here: viewtopic.php?f=67&t=4805&p=52462&hilit ... 100#p52462

Post Reply