Ohio tooth

This board is open for all matters and discussions pertaining to the Australian Yowie. Please keep on topic in this forum.
Post Reply
aaq
Silver Status
Posts: 139
Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2019 1:34 pm

Ohio tooth

Unread post by aaq » Sun Feb 07, 2021 8:44 pm

Has anybody seen this?

First video, found tooth near skeleton (early 2020):
https://youtu.be/63p3B-0AWd8

Second video, DNA results (guess what?:
https://youtu.be/A-Zd8syRWi0

moetunes
New Member
Posts: 39
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2012 9:36 am

Re: Ohio tooth

Unread post by moetunes » Mon Feb 08, 2021 5:02 am

I hadn't seen that before. Nice find aaq.
I would be suprised if there didn't turn out to be more teeth or bones in that cave.
Good to see the DNA folk want to explore it more and didn't just dismiss it.

User avatar
sensesonfire
Long Time Contributor
Posts: 877
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2013 12:08 pm
Position: Paranormal Researcher
Location: Western Australia

Re: Ohio tooth

Unread post by sensesonfire » Mon Feb 08, 2021 11:19 am

Maybe a Bigfoot tooth but I wouldn't jump to any conclusions. People are overlooking the fact that Ohio was and still is a hotbed for Giant skeletal discoveries thousands of them in fact and many have been discovered in caves.

And I'm certain that any DNA results on a Giants's tooth would reveal some startling results.
The human mind is only constrained by the barricades we build around it.

User avatar
sensesonfire
Long Time Contributor
Posts: 877
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2013 12:08 pm
Position: Paranormal Researcher
Location: Western Australia

Re: Ohio tooth

Unread post by sensesonfire » Mon Feb 08, 2021 11:21 am

sensesonfire wrote:
Mon Feb 08, 2021 11:19 am
DNA results
should have said DNA analysis.
The human mind is only constrained by the barricades we build around it.

aaq
Silver Status
Posts: 139
Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2019 1:34 pm

Re: Ohio tooth

Unread post by aaq » Mon Feb 08, 2021 1:14 pm

Moe, senses,

It's so hard to know with this stuff.
What does a 97-99% human match mean - contamination, as alike to a pumpkin as a human, or something actually very close to human?
Tooth size is interesting. The Cascade Mountains bone pile study put mouth size at 2x human, from memory. That molar looks probably 4 x the size (length) so it's a valid question to ask if it's too big for sasquatch.

It does look fairly recent, but I'm curious about the condition of the pulp - I guess it could last months? Did the lab get the tooth and find material with DNA, or was the organic material swabbed off by the guy who found it?

Post Reply