50 Years of Scientific Evidence for the Existence of Bigfoot

This board is open for all matters and discussions pertaining to the Australian Yowie. Please keep on topic in this forum.
Post Reply
moetunes
New Member
Posts: 42
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2012 9:36 am

50 Years of Scientific Evidence for the Existence of Bigfoot

Unread post by moetunes » Sun Mar 13, 2022 3:04 pm

https://www.ancient-origins.net/unexpla ... ot-0016496]
Here's a link to what I think is a well written summation of the major irrefutable scientific evidence collected and ignored about the existence of an unrecognised species in the U.S.
Nothing new for anyone that has been following developments for a while but a nice read.
If you scroll a little past the end of the article there is a small blurb about the author.
Cheers

User avatar
sensesonfire
Long Time Contributor
Posts: 938
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2013 12:08 pm
Position: Paranormal Researcher
Location: Western Australia

Re: 50 Years of Scientific Evidence for the Existence of Bigfoot

Unread post by sensesonfire » Mon Mar 14, 2022 12:18 pm

moetunes wrote:
Sun Mar 13, 2022 3:04 pm
https://www.ancient-origins.net/unexpla ... ot-0016496]
Here's a link to what I think is a well written summation of the major irrefutable scientific evidence collected and ignored about the existence of an unrecognised species in the U.S.
Nothing new for anyone that has been following developments for a while but a nice read.
If you scroll a little past the end of the article there is a small blurb about the author.
Cheers
Hi, moetunes,

Interesting read but the information ties in with much of what we know about these creatures at the present time. To me, the most compelling information is in the opening paragraphs:

This is certain to be a very controversial topic, but I’ve been meticulously researching and investigating the Bigfoot/Sasquatch/Yeti phenomenon since 1971, when I first read Ivan T. Sanderson’s breakthrough, 1968 book, Abominable Snowmen: Legend Come to Life ( still rated 4.9 out of five stars by Amazon.com), and realized that the actual, physical and forensic evidence of its existence was insurmountable. Over the past half-century, I gradually compiled a wealth of compelling evidence on this fascinating, scientific and historical mystery. Whether you choose to believe in Bigfoot or not, the official, conclusive, DNA evidence (which is absolutely impossible to fake) of very modern science has been on record for the past nine years, with an inescapable conclusion.

“You’re talking about a Yeti, or Bigfoot, or Sasquatch…

I’m SURE that they exist…British scientists have found…

Yeti hair…They don’t match up with the DNA cells

from (any) known animals .”


Doctor Jane Goodall, on National Public Radio, September 27, 2002, world’s foremost authority on chimpanzees.

“You can’t fake DNA evidence…the nuclear genome seems to have

human and nonhuman sequences
…Sasquatch is REAL, as proven

by (DNA) genetic analysis…The genome has some good, human

matches and some unknowns…with sequences that match nothing.”

Doctor David Swenson, Ph.D., biochemist with Green Resources Redux, Inc., 2013.

Here are my comments on these two quotes.
1. …They don’t match up with the DNA cells

from (any) known animals
.


So this should eliminate the constant references to Bigfoot being apes. They may look similar but they are not apes.


2. “You can’t fake DNA evidence…the nuclear genome seems to have

human and nonhuman sequences.



I have defined what the human and nonhuman sequences are enough times so no need to elaborate on that matter.
'' During the time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act".....George Orwell.

moetunes
New Member
Posts: 42
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2012 9:36 am

Re: 50 Years of Scientific Evidence for the Existence of Bigfoot

Unread post by moetunes » Wed Mar 23, 2022 7:20 pm

That seems like a bit of a rant...
I don't understand the reason for the red text.
There is no link to sources.

I came across an interesting read and thought others might enjoy it so shared it. I said there was nothing new for those that had been following developments. I also thought that the bonafides of the author showed him to someone that is not going to waste his time. But you missed that.

I don't get the reason for the above post...

Cheers ?

User avatar
sensesonfire
Long Time Contributor
Posts: 938
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2013 12:08 pm
Position: Paranormal Researcher
Location: Western Australia

Re: 50 Years of Scientific Evidence for the Existence of Bigfoot

Unread post by sensesonfire » Thu Mar 24, 2022 12:56 pm

moetunes wrote:
Wed Mar 23, 2022 7:20 pm
That seems like a bit of a rant...
I don't understand the reason for the red text.
There is no link to sources.

I came across an interesting read and thought others might enjoy it so shared it. I said there was nothing new for those that had been following developments. I also thought that the bonafides of the author showed him to someone that is not going to waste his time. But you missed that.

I don't get the reason for the above post...

Cheers ?
No personal rant against you moetunes I'm just alluding to the quantifying remarks from Dr Jane Godall and Dr David Swenson.

1. Doctor Jane Goodall, on National Public Radio, September 27, 2002, world’s foremost authority on chimpanzees.

“You’re talking about a Yeti, or Bigfoot, or Sasquatch…

I’m SURE that they exist…British scientists have found…

Yeti hair…They don’t match up with the DNA cells

from (any) known animals .”



2. Doctor David Swenson, PhD, a biochemist with Green Resources Redux, Inc., 2013.


“You can’t fake DNA evidence…the nuclear genome seems to have

human and nonhuman sequences…Sasquatch is REAL, as proven

by (DNA) genetic analysis…The genome has some good, human

matches and some unknowns…with sequences that match nothing.”


I can provide the link and the outcome to the most comprehensive DNA analysis by Geneticists on these creatures ever conducted.
This is no mystery to me in what these results have determined along with many other DNA samples after analysis the reports all come back with the same outcome having human genes combined with unknown DNA, in other words, a chimaera.

A Chimera is an organism composed of two or more genetically distinct tissues, as an organism that is partly male and partly female, or an artificially produced individual having tissues of several species.

I'm directing these findings to people who may have no idea what these creatures are. I've always maintained a strong suspicion of the origins of these entities and have no desire to keep repeating them. I may have diverged slightly from the point of your story but I noticed Dr Jane Goodall and Dr David Swenson's comments appeared and decided on additional information.

Cheers. :)
'' During the time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act".....George Orwell.

Post Reply