Why? I would love to know what people believe them to be. I too, have a theory, based on a dream I had in the 90's when I was 'running' with some... very, very vivid dream in which I understood them to be an ancient species, much, much older than Homo Sapiens. And once plentiful, they had been killed off and pushed back into remote areas centuries ago, leaving only a few fragments of small packs. In the dream I got the impression they had almost entirely died out.sensesonfire wrote: I know what these creatures are but I'll keep my opinion to myself. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vBzbM-3bEx8.
Wolf wrote:Why? I would love to know what people believe '.sensesonfire wrote: I know what these creatures are but I'll keep my opinion to myself. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vBzbM-3bEx8.
Wolf probably bought them here with his dream. Thanks for that wolf! 
Ha, no worries.Yowie bait wrote:I thought dogman was a type of sasquatch but obviously not. I hope theyre not here. The whole idea of a dogman gives me the creeps but i did find it funny that that one chased the ladies car in the first report. He shouldve asked if it bit her tyres.
I feel it has helped more than once, especially standing up to judges and cops in court (nothing serious... just speeding fines and whatnot).Yowie bait wrote:"The wolfmen" sounds better than "dogman" . We should call it The Australian Wolfman. Hey Wolf thats great if a dream or nightmare can inspire you and help you in your daily life. Maybe thats what theyre for.
Go and watch a Trump speech and be frightened and scared much, much more . . .!ChrisV wrote:They are just too scary to consider right now....I think I need to go watch some family friendly tv now!!
TRump?macquariedave wrote:Go and watch a Trump speech and be frightened and scared much, much more . . .!ChrisV wrote:They are just too scary to consider right now....I think I need to go watch some family friendly tv now!!
Yeah, but most of the reports I have listened to and read have them ranging from 6-12', with the majority being in the 6-9' range.Yowie bait wrote:I dunno . There used to be edit fumction if you look at the old posts. Maybe so we cant delete our posts and screw up the threads? These dogman reports in the states have them at 15 and 20ft tall!
Your take on Lisa is fair enough. It's important to be cautious with such an incredible story. It would be nice to get some professional opinions about her state of mind. That said, she should be in line for an Academy award if it turns out she is confabulating. She is very convincing! Be good to see her interviewed on camera by an experienced researcher. That way, the video would show tell tale body language clues about her veracity. I’d be interested to hear what others think… does it sound like she is telling the truth?Wolf wrote:I listened to Lia's account more than once a couple of weeks ago.
Something about her speech pattern reminds me of a bipolar woman I know who lies through her teeth, constantly making up stories for attention (I'm not saying Lisa is lying, just being cautious).
Also, she says she is 49 and the Currumbin events occured when she was in her early to mid twenties, which would put the approximate year of these events around the early 90's. Because of this I wish Vic had asked her what kind of mobile her son was using when one chased him into the house.
Hardly anyone had mobile phones in the early 90s and those that did carried them as a large, heavy bag over their shoulder. I remember mine well. We got one late 95 (or was it early in 96?... can't remember now) because I was living in a bus at the time and obviously could not have a landline. It was so big and heavy it could have been used as a weapon!
I Lisa had of answered that the phone was small enough to be one piece, hand held, we would know she was lying.
ChrisV wrote:I agree - the Dogman or Wolfman scares the c**p out of me.
Yowies I can digest. There are numerous reports that give an understanding of what it could be, look like and behaviour.
The Dogman on the other hand sounds like something from the gates of hell. An upright doberman looking beast that wanders out there - thats enough to freak me out forever and a day. Imagine one of those looking thru your bedroom window!!
I'm not entirely convinced they are real species...maybe from another realm sits with me better because there are just so few and far reports in Australia. But I don't want to be proved wrong under any circumstances!!! They are just too scary to consider right now....I think I need to go watch some family friendly tv now!!
How did they change him from dogman to human? Sorry i just had to ask.sensesonfire wrote:Wolf mentions the Cynoephelus I do know about these half human/half dog creatures and without wanting to turn this into a religious discussion or argument my belief is that they are Nephilim hybrids. Biologically there is no way humans could procreate with dogs to produce life but the Nephilim could so these dogman obviously came from somewhere. In ancient scriptures Saint Christopher was represented as having the body of a man and the head of a dog. Below is an excerpt about St Christopher.
In Eastern Orthodox icons, Saint Christopher is sometimes represented with the head of a dog. The background to the dog-headed Christopher is laid in the reign of the Emperor Diocletian, when a man named Reprebus, Rebrebus or Reprobus was captured in combat against tribes dwelling to the west of Egypt in Cyrenaica. To the unit of soldiers, according to the hagiographic narrative, was assigned the name numerus Marmaritarum or "Unit of the Marmaritae", which suggests an otherwise-unidentified "Marmaritae" (perhaps the same as the Marmaricae Berber tribe of Cyrenaica). He was reported to be of enormous size, with the head of a dog instead of a man, apparently a characteristic of the Marmaritae. This Byzantine depiction of St. Christopher as dog-headed resulted from their misinterpretation of the Latin term Cananeus (Canaanite) to read canineus (canine).[18]
According to the medieval Irish Passion of St. Christopher, "This Christopher was one of the Dog-heads, a race that had the heads of dogs and ate human flesh." [19] It was commonly accepted at the time that there were several types of races, the Cynocephalus, or dog headed people, being one of many believed to populate the world.
The German bishop and poet Walter of Speyer portrayed St. Christopher as a giant of a cynocephalic species in the land of the Chananeans who ate human flesh and barked. Eventually, Christopher met the Christ child, regretted his former behavior, and received baptism. He, too, was rewarded with a human appearance, whereupon he devoted his life to Christian service and became an athlete of God, one of the soldier-saints.[20]
I underline...... This Byzantine depiction of St. Christopher as dog-headed resulted from their misinterpretation of the Latin term Cananeus (Canaanite) to read canineus (canine).[18]. I also acknowledge many Christian churches don't buy into this interpretation at all.
Wolf wrote:hmmmm...
Until to day I had never heard of the Cynocephali, not St Christopher being 'dog-headed'. Of course, everyone knows of Anubis, the Jackal headed god of the Egyptians.
There is so little we know of human history, let alone non-human history. I have often argued that theoretically there was a very high probability a self-aware, highly intelligent dinosaur species existed (or several species).
After all, they evolved and survived for well over 60 MILLION years! In comparison, humans have evolved into an 'intelligent' species over a mere (arguably less) 1.5 million years.
All we know of this period of history are fossils, and bearing in mind fossils do not get produced in tropical environments (most of the planet back then) we know only a very small percentage of a percentile of what walked the earth, and even then what we 'know' is largely conjecture in a field where someone proposing new ideas tends to get ignored. For example, for over a hundred years scientists thought of dinosaurs as cold-blooded lizards when in fact, most were warm-blooded and more closely relate to the birds of today.
Many scientists now even agree that the famous T-rex most likely had feathers!
If an intelligent dino existed and even built civilisations and cities out of the plentiful wood there would be no trace. Only stone survives so long, and even then rarely.
Back to the more modern epoch of mammals... who is to say canines did not develop on their own into a highly intelligent night hunter that benefited by evolving into a bipedal form? Scientists agree it was the move from travelling on four legs to two that greatly increased brain capacity as the hands were freed up for other tasks other than motion. Primates may not have been the only branch of the mammalian tree to 'discover' this advantage.
Wolf wrote:Ha, no worries.Yowie bait wrote:I thought dogman was a type of sasquatch but obviously not. I hope theyre not here. The whole idea of a dogman gives me the creeps but i did find it funny that that one chased the ladies car in the first report. He shouldve asked if it bit her tyres.
When I remember the sense of fear I got from it, I also remember a feeling of kinship, like it was my totem. Weirdly, it gave me a sense of security at the same time as the intense fear it put off.
I woke up thinking that was too real, and thinking, wow if that thing is my totem... I have no need to fear ever again.
Thanks for the compliment, but it is simply that I think things through in attempt to work out possibilities that could fill the huge gaps in my knowledge. My Dad was the same, always saying there has never existed a problem that cannot be solved by simply thinking about it (he had a year 6 education BTW, but invented many things that made his work easier)Tuckeroo wrote:
Hi Wolf, You have great knowledge and insight.
Good points.Tuckeroo wrote: It's the standing up thing about dog-man that I have trouble with. They would need different back legs and hip structure
to walk on two legs.
You have seen how clumsy a dog is when it's only on its back legs. So does the dog-man front half look canine and the back half look
more chunkier like the Yowie, although Dog-man are always described as being completely dog like.
Not lame at all, thought provoking.Tuckeroo wrote:
Sorry if I'm splitting hairs with my lame literalness, if it's declared their super-natural my question is irrelevant.
T.
