Yowie bait wrote: Tue May 15, 2018 7:21 pm
Your spot on there ITD about the wild ( or part wild in your case) animals not liking the cameras. We have a very destructive and brash currorong tormenting us at the moment. Seems the only thing that scares him is to pull out the phone camera and point it in his direction.
I notice out in the bush sometimes i only need to turn phone on and the animals take off. Maybe the electronics they're picking up on as well as lense( eye?).
The Aboriginal lore and names for the yowie does vary from region to region but is still similar.
The jury is still out on whether the yowie is more animal or man . Theyre certainly animalistic but most reports suggest something in between!
Good for you to keep an open mind on the subject. I could tell you that I and many others know they definetely exist and without a shadow of doubt but it really is something you need to see/ experience for yourself!
If you do ever have an encounter, then I hope it's not an aggro one. Those are the worst!!
I do wonder if, rather than the device (camera, phone, etc) being the issue, it's something about our body language which shifts when we're focusing on the animal. It would be some tiny shift, something way too subtle for us to recognise in ourselves, but mammals with good wild instincts are likely very capable of detecting it.
Meantime, I cannot in good conscience have other than an open mind on BF/Y. Asserting that they don't exist is a silly as asserting that gods don't exist (and I don't think gods do exist, but I can't KNOW that). I think about the Wollemi Pine, consider the terrain in which it was discovered, and realise that we know very little about what could be living in such remote and inaccessible places. Left undisturbed by mankind for thousands of years, avoiding evolutionary drivers and hybridisation, it's all to play for IMO. I have to balance that with the hard truth that any such large mammal needs a significant breeding pool, AND huge tracts of wilderness, to survive. To survive at all, much less undetected. That significantly reduces the likelihood, but doesn't rule it out entirely. This last explains my preference for encounters/research originating in 'proper' wilderness or the perimeters of same, and my perhaps too easy dismissal of urban and rural fringe encounters.
And I also hope to avoid aggro encounters! Though given the amount of time we spent in the forest, it's more practical to choose non-belief - while there. I save my theorising for when I'm home, safe, in front of the computer. If I thought about it too much while in the bush, I think I'd lose my mind
