Yowiehunters Forum

Greg W C Sims wrote:Knees either side of back supporting majority of its weight.

sensesonfire wrote:Just a video showing why I believe Yowie/Bigfoot are able to transfigure from a physical to a spiritual dimension.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R3pvaAhMWzM

Scarts wrote:Nice find, sensesonfire! Bogus or legit, I was so impressed, I was going to make that figure in the photo my new avatar!

The one thing I find irritating, is there was zero mention of the negatives, which would help prove the image hadn't been tampered with. Granted, film does deteriorate after a while, but being such a mysterious photo, it would have been nice if the owner had made an attempt to preserve the negatives also.

What leads you to conclude that photo is a load of rubbish, macca?

Scarts wrote:Why did you, "Begin to think more perhaps that that", the photo is a load of rubbish, Macca? Wow! I've used your very own words this time to help you understand what I'm asking.

Scarts wrote:
Something worth considering, is ol Reg mentioned that one night something shook his shoulder before waking him up to a dingo standing alongside him. It wasn't the dingo that perplexed Reg, but who or what shook his shoulder, alerting him to the danger.

Searcher wrote:The fascinating and controversial photo taken by Reg Jones in 1932 with a Box Brownie camera has long fueled debate. I recall first seeing it in an episode ‘The Extraordinary”, an Australian produced TV program hosted by Warrick Moss in the early 90’s.
If only we still had the original roll of film containing that negative!! Today’s photographic analysis techniques would soon sort it out… I’ll be surprised if Reg is still with us, but as he obviously knew how important this photograph was, you would like to think his family would have kept the roll of film. That’s if he still had it in the first place…

Only my opinion, but I reckon Reg has captured an image of a Yowie ghost. Just as deceased people sometimes appear in photographs, so too do animals. Of course Reg and his friends would not have seen the immense figure as it was vibrating in a different dimension. However, the photographic emulsion on the film can often pick up these anomalies.

Again, my opinion, but I don’t think the Yowie image is a result of ‘tricks of light’. There are simply too many elements that would need to fall in place to make this happen. The image shown looks like it has been zoomed and cropped to emphasise both the two subjects and the mystery image behind. I think the original frame would have been much wider with the subjects more central.

If old Reg was a bit of a fox and had framed the original shot to the right to allow a double exposure with a model ape (or something) then it is obviously a fraud. However, if you watch and listen intently to his interview, my gut feeling is he is telling the truth.



Don’t you just love a good mystery!

Brindabella Ranger wrote:Hi Sensesonfire, just saw this topic. Always interesting reading posts with a religious point of view. Without questioning your opinion, I’ll jot down mine with regards to your topic. I’ll work backwards.

In December last year I got hold of a book called ‘The Ancient Giants Who Ruled America’ written by Richard J Dewhurst who is an Emmy Award-winning writer of the HBO feature documentary Dear America: Letters Home from Vietnam. A graduate of NYU with degrees in journalism, film, and television, he has written and edited for the History Channel, the Arts & Entertainment Channel, PBS, Fox Television and Fox Films, ABC News, TNT, Paramount Pictures, and the Miami Herald. With those credentials he’s no hoaxer, but neither an expert in the field of anthropology or ancient history for that matter. But he's done a terrific job of compiling the best reports of ‘giant skeleton’ finds (they are often referred as the Mound Builders) in the US for the last three hundred years. He doesn’t jump to conclusions or exaggerate and makes logical assumptions based on the evidence. His main angle is to throw suspicion on the Smithsonian Institute as to the cover up of the bones that ‘seem to disappear once unearthed’.

Regardless, my interest in the book was that I was seeking a connection between Sasquatch and these giant finds, but alas, there was none to be made. Dewhurst asserts these giants would have averaged between 6.5-10 feet tall (quickly discredits any report of greater height), wore an array of woven clothing, possessed sophisticated jewelry, pottery and most notably wielded copper and brass weapons. It was then found the copper used was connected to a number of ancient copper mines discovered near the Great Lakes. Obviously, these were either another culture of homo sapiens, or considering they kicked around in the America’s in 2000 B.C.E could have been another homo off-shoot (considering their size). If you enjoy the mysteries of human history that throws a spanner in evolution of civilization this book is great, but the evidence can’t be connected to the Sasquatch in anyway.

Regardless, the detailed reports on the skeletons and most notably the legends of the Native Americans suggests these giants were of ‘a giant fair race, some with flaming red hair’ and originally appeared from the east. If I’m to make an educated guess, that’s a description of a Caucasian of some sort. Since we can be confident Caucasians originated in Europe it would be logical these ‘giants’ came to America via the Atlantic (i.e the east), yes, more than thousand years before Columbus.

Forgetting the Columbus thing for a moment (should have been re-written years ago anyway) and assuming these giants originated in Europe, a coincidence can be drawn that they existed around the time the Bible speaks of the Nephilim. Could have long-disappeared cultures and peoples of ancient times reached giant size (between 6.5 and 10 feet)? I believe they could have. If anyone has met a big Tongan or stood next to an NBL team today would immediately say ‘yes’.

I know a bit about the Bible and know many people who live by it. Most of those whom I get along with admit the stories (specifically the Old Testament) shouldn’t be taken too seriously as many are based more on folk lore/myths/tales of the ancient peoples in that area. It can also be clearly admitted the stories are based on the perceptions and experiences of ancient peoples bereft of worldly knowledge we possess today – picture this – a small tribe in a remote Israeli valley area are invaded by a marauding army of wild Northmen (Caucasians) of great size in 2000 B.C.E. Compared to the primitive villagers of small stature, these ‘giants’ are so fierce and powerful they must be fallen angels or demons. Because they were often on male-only raiding parties, they often took the women of the tribe (some may have even had a go at a sheep/goat or two when desperate) raped them and bore children of mixed blood who also grew to a large size and possessed a wild personality.

I think the Old Testament is full of good stories and holds an interesting place in that misty area of history vs. myth of our human history, but tying it to our hairy friends whether it be the Yowie, Almas, Yeti, Sasquatch or Orang Pendek, I think the stretch is too great.

Again, just my opinion.

sensesonfire wrote:

Brindabella Ranger wrote:Hi Sensesonfire, just saw this topic. Always interesting reading posts with a religious point of view. Without questioning your opinion, I’ll jot down mine with regards to your topic. I’ll work backwards.

In December last year I got hold of a book called ‘The Ancient Giants Who Ruled America’ written by Richard J Dewhurst who is an Emmy Award-winning writer of the HBO feature documentary Dear America: Letters Home from Vietnam. A graduate of NYU with degrees in journalism, film, and television, he has written and edited for the History Channel, the Arts & Entertainment Channel, PBS, Fox Television and Fox Films, ABC News, TNT, Paramount Pictures, and the Miami Herald. With those credentials he’s no hoaxer, but neither an expert in the field of anthropology or ancient history for that matter. But he's done a terrific job of compiling the best reports of ‘giant skeleton’ finds (they are often referred as the Mound Builders) in the US for the last three hundred years. He doesn’t jump to conclusions or exaggerate and makes logical assumptions based on the evidence. His main angle is to throw suspicion on the Smithsonian Institute as to the cover up of the bones that ‘seem to disappear once unearthed’.

Regardless, my interest in the book was that I was seeking a connection between Sasquatch and these giant finds, but alas, there was none to be made. Dewhurst asserts these giants would have averaged between 6.5-10 feet tall (quickly discredits any report of greater height), wore an array of woven clothing, possessed sophisticated jewelry, pottery and most notably wielded copper and brass weapons. It was then found the copper used was connected to a number of ancient copper mines discovered near the Great Lakes. Obviously, these were either another culture of homo sapiens, or considering they kicked around in the America’s in 2000 B.C.E could have been another homo off-shoot (considering their size). If you enjoy the mysteries of human history that throws a spanner in evolution of civilization this book is great, but the evidence can’t be connected to the Sasquatch in anyway.

Regardless, the detailed reports on the skeletons and most notably the legends of the Native Americans suggests these giants were of ‘a giant fair race, some with flaming red hair’ and originally appeared from the east. If I’m to make an educated guess, that’s a description of a Caucasian of some sort. Since we can be confident Caucasians originated in Europe it would be logical these ‘giants’ came to America via the Atlantic (i.e the east), yes, more than thousand years before Columbus.

Forgetting the Columbus thing for a moment (should have been re-written years ago anyway) and assuming these giants originated in Europe, a coincidence can be drawn that they existed around the time the Bible speaks of the Nephilim. Could have long-disappeared cultures and peoples of ancient times reached giant size (between 6.5 and 10 feet)? I believe they could have. If anyone has met a big Tongan or stood next to an NBL team today would immediately say ‘yes’.

I know a bit about the Bible and know many people who live by it. Most of those whom I get along with admit the stories (specifically the Old Testament) shouldn’t be taken too seriously as many are based more on folk lore/myths/tales of the ancient peoples in that area. It can also be clearly admitted the stories are based on the perceptions and experiences of ancient peoples bereft of worldly knowledge we possess today – picture this – a small tribe in a remote Israeli valley area are invaded by a marauding army of wild Northmen (Caucasians) of great size in 2000 B.C.E. Compared to the primitive villagers of small stature, these ‘giants’ are so fierce and powerful they must be fallen angels or demons. Because they were often on male-only raiding parties, they often took the women of the tribe (some may have even had a go at a sheep/goat or two when desperate) raped them and bore children of mixed blood who also grew to a large size and possessed a wild personality.

I think the Old Testament is full of good stories and holds an interesting place in that misty area of history vs. myth of our human history, but tying it to our hairy friends whether it be the Yowie, Almas, Yeti, Sasquatch or Orang Pendek, I think the stretch is too great.

Again, just my opinion.

Quantum Bigfoot Theory
Posted by Ron Morehead on Sunday, October 19, 2014

quantum bigfoot theory

Are you in the ‘Ape Camp’? Do you think that Bigfoot is probably just another ape that needs discovering? You may want to consider this article and re-evaluate that thought…especially if you’re getting frustrated in the age-old way of searching for Bigfoot and it’s not getting you anywhere.

Researchers knock on trees, sound-blast screams and yells, or whoop all over the hillside trying to get the attention of a Bigfoot. Professional trackers experience track-ways left by these creatures that abruptly end, highly trained dogs will not pick up the scent, or if they do they usually don’t come back. If what you’re doing doesn’t get the results you want, change what you’re doing…it’s that simple. Folks who claim to be researchers discount those surreal accounts that don’t fall into their preset paradigm. Is it time to reach beyond Newtonian rules of classical mechanics, and delve into a science that was established almost 100 years ago by Einstein, Born, Heisenberg and Schrödinger? The world has become dependent on this hidden micro-world science, yet its properties are not thoroughly understood…if you can’t see it, it aint there…right? Wrong. We use cell phones, microwave ovens, computers, etc…all of which are brought to us through quantum mechanics. Quantum physics is a subset of quantum mechanics.

Professional researchers have found evidence of quantum coherence in living organisms. It has been found in our sense of smell, in the parts of bird’s brains responsible for navigation and in plant photosynthesis. However, the world of quantum physics has been locked in mathematics. It’s accepted worldwide by physicists. We don’t see it, but it’s ever present in our lives. We get that feeling that something is wrong, the phone rings and Aunt Marybell Sue was in a car wreck. You have a déjà vu …this has happened before. Without knowing it, could psychics actually be relating to folks from a quantum level?

Some of us researchers are in the dark ages of science. I think it’s time to move forward and consider what it is that gives Bigfoot his unusual abilities. Is there a race of giants that have inherited the ability to move into the macro-world with quantum physics? In the past, while interviewing purported Bigfoot accounts I’ve discarded those that say they saw the creature disappear. Many have told me that unusual lights, orbs or UFO’s, are present when they witnessed a Bigfoot. Advanced technology might seem paranormal to many, but it has previously been on earth as can be readily seen all over South America.

What’s considered paranormal today, with knowledge, will become normal tomorrow. So, if you choose to follow this line of thought, how do we change our methods of research into the Bigfoot phenomenon?

Number One; if you think you might be able to claim the 10 million dollar reward by the use of your high powered gun, put it away…if these creatures are what I’m alluding to that won’t work.

Number Two: You don’t have to be a physicist to understand enough about quantum physics to realize it could very well be our answer to the understanding of how Bigfoot might operate.

Number Three: These entities will make contact with you on their terms and in their time…unless, of course, you’re lucky like Roger Patterson and Bob Gimlin and get a picture of one (Patterson/Gimlin film, 1967). Set up camp in a remote area where other humans are not likely to be around. Be consistent and predicable. Don’t try to set up traps…their cognizance will outshine you on that level. They are part human. What the other part is might be something to consider, and then think a little on whether or not you really want to make contact with them.

So, should we be afraid…just what could Bigfoot be anyway? The remains of giants have been found on earth before. Most of us know about Greek mythology regarding aliens copulating with human women who then gave birth to a half god-half human, e.g., Zeus, Hades, Poseidon, Hercules, and so on. They supposedly had great powers and supernatural abilities. And most of us know of the biblical accounts of the same type of cross-breeding. If we are to believe there is a core of truth to these stories, could Bigfoot be a diluted remnant of these and have inherited some of their quantum abilities.

We all know of the different accounts of the great flood in ancient texts. According to some of these texts it was brought about because of the infection of the human genome (man, God’s special creation) by aliens, e.g. the Nephilim, half alien-half human. That being said let’s move forward to Isaac’’s wife, Rebekah, and the twins she gave birth to. The first boy was Esau, who was red and hairy (Gen 26: 24-26). The second was Jacob, who was loved, but Esau was hated (Romans 9: 13)…why? As the story goes, Esau gave up his birthright to Jacob, eventually moved, and became the patriarch of a race of bearded, red-haired, nomadic people. Because of the ‘red’ they were called the Edomites (Edom meaning red). Recently one of my colleagues pointed out that the Edomites were depicted in Michelangelo’s painting of The Last Judgment, in 1541. At the bottom of the painting you’ll see the hairy Edomites in a cave…hmm, any connection?

Now the big question; can two eggs in a woman’s uterus be fertilized by two different males at the same time? The answer is ‘Yes’. One in 400 sets of fraternal human twins is bipaternal (http://www.babycenter.com). So my theory, which is shared by a few others, is that an alien (Lucifer), trying to corrupt the human genome again, fertilized one of Rebekah’s eggs and Esau was the result. This would have created a human hybrid and Bigfoot just might be a remnant of that.

Bottom line; these creatures (Bigfoot/Sasquatch) have quantum abilities because their ancestral father was alien (nuDNA, Lucifer). Their ancestral mother was human (mtDNA, Rebekah). They are a diluted remnant of alien intervention into God’s creation. Esau took his wives from Canaan…the land of giants. Why would an alien (Lucifer) go through the trouble of, again, trying to infect the human genome, post flood…maybe to prevent an uncontaminated birth of a very special being to be born hundreds of years later?…that very same individual who would keep God’s creation pure and allow us to be what He created us to be (1 Peter 2:9).

There are many theories regarding Bigfoot, this is just one. If the accounts are true regarding UFO’s being sighted around these creatures perhaps aliens are still working the earth, altering the DNA of a great ape…there is a reason…
–Ron Morehead

Tex wrote:This is a hard argument.
I myself was a church going Christian .
I have had some amazing things happen in my life that I can only put down as an incredible coincidence or God played a big part in them. I won't bore you guys with the details.
But the bible is a struggle for me. It is one of the reasons I find it hard to go to church, the stories in my mind are just too outrageous. Now this is just my thinking, I analyse everything, If I don't see it I can't believe it.
I have the same struggle with yowies. Until I see one I can only assume they exist.
But as for a God too many things have happened in my life too not believe in him. Same as the devil, all you have to do to find him as real is too start to become a Christian and you will have him knocking on your door real quick.

As for evolution there is more evidence in that than a guy swallowed by a whale or a boat big enough to carry all the animals on earth. This is just my opinion and I don't wish to upset anyone else's belief.

I don't have to many problems with the New Testament but the old one is pretty weird.

I think that it's hard for me as it is written by man and the men who wrote it say god told them too. but they say god told them. Hmmm? The whole bible is based on faith, you have to have faith to believe. I don't have enough of that to truly believe, same with yowies I suppose.

I've seen those skeleton photos and I know I can photoshop something like that, I was a graphic designer for 15 years and Photoshop was one of my greatest strengths. So unfortunately seeing a photo of something doesn't cut it either. Like. I said if I see it I will believe it.

Too many bull artists in this world.

Hope I don't upset any one I just threw in my opinion.

Searcher wrote:Here’s a response to Tex and sensesonfire, trying not to drift too far off topic. My view is there are probably 100’s of different religions on this planet and each and every one thinks only they are right. It is mostly a blind faith belief system and brainwashing plays a big part. In saying that, I do have a belief in an ultimate creator who allows nature to control the workings of the entire universe.

As we all know, the earth and all its inhabitants are a speck of dust in an infinitely vast cosmos. There is no doubt to me our universe is teeming with life. And intelligent life has been visiting this 4.5 billion year old planet for eons.

Now, fast forward to when Jimmy Carter was elected President. UFO buffs will know he was subsequently briefed on the ET/UFO situation (as new Presidents are) and was later found sobbing with his head on his desk. He was told religion as we know it is man made. Check it out with Google.

Could this be one of the main reasons why governments refuse to acknowledge the existence of ET despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary? Revealing a universal truth would probably decimate the religions of the world. From what I can gather, the alien visitors whose societies are many thousands or even a million years more advanced, do not worship a God the way we do. They believe the universe is God.

Make no mistake… all this stuff is heavy enough to do your head in! Yowies are a piece of cake by comparison!

Searcher wrote:G’day Sensesonfire. Respect your views too and your right to express them, but your reply made absolutely no sense at all!

It suggests I said a Yowie was regarded as a superior life form. Didn’t say anything at all like that…suggest you read a little more closely!

Then again, you did say in a previous post “keep in mind I do not regard UFO's or Bigfoot as aliens from another planet.”
So where on earth do you think UFOs come from and do you believe there is no alien life on any of the myriad of other planets out there in this galaxy and billions of others?