Page 2 of 2
Re: Nsw fires
Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2020 4:59 pm
by Wolf
Wolf wrote: Thu Jan 09, 2020 4:58 pm
Didn't you guys know?
... they transmogrify into Scrub Turkeys and smiley fly away.
SIMPLY! ... nothing like spell check to ruin a joke

Re: Nsw fires
Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2020 7:07 pm
by aaq
Wolf wrote: Thu Jan 09, 2020 4:58 pm
Didn't you guys know?
... they transmogrify into Scrub Turkeys and smiley fly away.
Wolf, PLEASE stay focussed, we're talking about Xmas ham not Xmas turkey

Re: Nsw fires
Posted: Fri Jan 10, 2020 2:09 pm
by Dean Harrison
Re: Nsw fires
Posted: Fri Jan 10, 2020 3:48 pm
by Dion
lol Do people actually read the Daily Mail?
Re: Nsw fires
Posted: Fri Jan 10, 2020 5:17 pm
by Yowie bait
Must have been a slow news day.

Re: Nsw fires
Posted: Fri Jan 10, 2020 7:15 pm
by aaq
Not the first time they've picked something off here or the Facebook group...
Re: Nsw fires
Posted: Sun Jan 12, 2020 4:40 pm
by Shane R
I think for sure that they have different ways to avoid bush fires and all the smoke. They could hide in the network of underground tunnels and cave systems in their area, there are many cave systems in N.S.W, especially in the blue mountains and in Tidbinbilla and the Brindabella national park area, west of Canberra.
I am very sure they already know how to migrate throughout N.S.W and avoid areas with allot of people, so once a fire has started they would know where to go and how to avoid the devastation.
They move exceptionally fast, 6 miles is a walk in the park for them. Perhaps they move at night and avoid public areas to avoid being seen.
Re: Australian fires - formally "NSW fires" thread
Posted: Mon Jan 13, 2020 2:55 pm
by Dion
Andrew wrote: Fri Dec 13, 2019 12:02 pm
Was just wondering after the nsw fire have any yowie body's been found large areas of there habitat now destroyed where are they now going I would bet there would be a lot more sightings is surrounding Bush lands I'm from victoria I live in the bunyip state forest we had a large fire here last year in Feb but didnt burn where i am and I've been getting a lot of stick thrown on my roof dont know where they are coming from
Thread title change to "Australian Fires" after the devastation of fires across Australia.
Re: Australian fires - formally "NSW fires" thread
Posted: Sun Jan 19, 2020 4:52 pm
by TheBlackStump
There is a bigger picture to climate change , drought and fires. The cabal controlled government knows what is going on. Cabal owned media will not report this. It is all part of United Nations Agenda 21 and United Nations Agenda 2030. 21 stands for the 21st century. The cabal are behind it all in the background. It is all leading to a New World Order/onweworld government which the cabal will control in the background. What is happening now was initially forecast back in 1954 by the cabal. A genocide event using silent weapons for quiet wars.
Just like Operation Torch California, hard evidence of DEWs appearing throughout Australian bushfires (Video + Photo Proof)
Directed Energy Weapons Being Used
in Operation Torch Australia
First, here’s a photo taken by the New South Wales Fire Department of a particle beam or laser beam. You can see the NSW fire truck in the foreground of the second screenshot below. (see link above of recent pic taken by a Wantgong NSW RFS crew member )
__________________________________________________________________________________________
http://themillenniumreport.com/2019/12/ ... son-fires/
OPERATION TORCH AUSTRALIA: A Special Report on the Geoengineered Firestorms and DEW-triggered Arson Fires
An Apocalyptic Geoengineering Project of Epic Proportions
Re: Australian fires - formally "NSW fires" thread
Posted: Sun Jan 19, 2020 5:17 pm
by TheBlackStump
http://stateofthenation.co/?p=3463
Just like Operation Torch California, hard evidence of DEWs appearing throughout Australian bushfires (Video + Photo Proof)
See pics in above link taken by a Wantagong NSW RFS crew menber
Re: Australian fires - formally "NSW fires" thread
Posted: Sun Jan 19, 2020 7:02 pm
by Rusty2
Without being disrespectful , and before we run off into a conspiracy , ask yourself this question .
Why would an energy weapon be needed to start a fire which is already burning , during the middle of the day , in front of witnesses with cameras ?
If DEW's are real and I'm not saying they're not , wouldn't you use them in the middle of the night in the middle of nowhere ?
Here's the link to the actual video .
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EDJhupG ... e=emb_logo
In the description are the links to the videos used . I'll find the video when I get time , but if there are any detectives on here who have time maybe we can find the original video and whether it's fake or not .
Re: Australian fires - formally "NSW fires" thread
Posted: Mon Jan 20, 2020 5:55 am
by TheBlackStump
Hi Rusty2
I understand your doubts.
Last week I tried to chase up WANTAGONG RFS contact details so I could get direct verificarion of pic. I could not find contact details anywhere after spending some time looking. I will ring NSW RFS and see if thry will give me contact details.
Re: Australian fires - formally "NSW fires" thread
Posted: Mon Jan 20, 2020 8:10 am
by bassplyr
Rusty has a point. DEW is kinda doing things the hard way. Why not drop a match instead. Its a lot easier and cheaper.
Nearly all those photos look like fire tornadoes, or whatever the technical term is, to me. The heat from those fires are causing a horrific maelstrom of air pressure and winds going every which direction inside the inferno. Two streams of wind butting into each other from different directions forms a tight funnel of flame under the right conditions. Hose columns of fire are common in many big blazes that have known causes. Its just something big fires often do.
Besides if they were going to go with DEW it would be more likely they would be in the higher frequency range like blue or ultra violet. Red lasers dont have much heat compared to the upper register of colours. You can make them set things on fire but they arent very efficient at it. And to get the beam, even with phase conjugate collimation helping maintain it while its fired from a satellite or aircraft would require tons of power they probably arent capable of supplying. There's a reason when you look at DEW tests on missiles and what not they're invisible or close to it. Its because theyre usually ultra violet.
Re: Australian fires - formally "NSW fires" thread
Posted: Mon Jan 20, 2020 9:10 am
by TheBlackStump
Fair enough comments.
I thought that red/orange/yellow in the colour spectrum gave off more heat than blues or uv. I will have to look into that again.
We live on an electric planet in an electric universe. Last century Nicola Tesla developed a way to harness and use electricity drawing from the ground and air. So generating enough power may not be an issue. Even large advanced high tech batteries the military use may store/generate the power needed....
Re: Australian fires - formally "NSW fires" thread
Posted: Mon Jan 20, 2020 11:07 am
by Wolf
Rusty2 wrote: Sun Jan 19, 2020 7:02 pm
Why would an energy weapon be needed to start a fire which is already burning , during the middle of the day , in front of witnesses with cameras ?
Perhaps if 'those watching' could see a particular fire was burning out too fast/slow/in danger of being put out?
... just a thought.
As to the around 200 people arrested for arson... nationalities? occupations? ages? ... nary a word from the controlled-narrative-pushing media...
In 2012 the Al Kayeedah
(purposely misspelt to avoid algo detection) monthly magazine
(I assume something along the lines of Women's Weekly) suggested their brainwashed idiots use fire to attack 'the enemy's' social structure/ economy/morality...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-EHR7la ... e=youtu.be
Re: Australian fires - formally "NSW fires" thread
Posted: Mon Jan 20, 2020 11:08 am
by Wolf
The youtube link I mis-posted above is about DEW predictive programming and other things, like who is behind it...
Re: Australian fires - formally "NSW fires" thread
Posted: Mon Jan 20, 2020 11:58 am
by bassplyr
The military has a few aces up its sleeve in power generation true. But its the beam colour vs energy density relationship and how much juice you can feed it thats the issue.
You can think of red being on the lower end of the energy spectrum. Blue the upper (for visual light) although that can be a little misleading.
Ultimately the colour of the beam doesnt matter its the wattage the beam is putting out that does the damage. The differences in colour is the energy density Blue, violet and ultra violet are much more dense due to their higher frequency and shorter wavelength thus "hotter" and more focused on target. Think of when you used to play with a magnifying glass. The lense focused the energy into a tighter spot making it hotter quicker and with less sunlight. Red is more diffused and not as focused on target so the energy spreads out and is less "hotter" like when you would hold the lense on a bad angle and the beam would spread out being less effective.
Besides orangy reds beams like believed in the photos are a bit obvious. Why not use something invisible like ultra violet or infrared. And, with either infrared or ultraviolet you dont leave any witnesses since people cant see it.
And i want to clarify something from my prior post. Infra red and ultraviolet are what dew lasers use not just ultraviolet alone. There are plenty of infrared laser dew systems. They're cheaper and depending on the targeting material better options. Where as ultraviolet dew systems have their own set of advantages. Either way with dew lasers its going to be nothing thats visible.
As for other types of dew weapons being unlikely. Particle beams strong enough to cause fires have all sorts of visual effects from their usage that would be obvious. The particles are slamming into the regular particles in the atmosphere as they bore their way to the target. This causes light blooming effects that make them stand out like a sore thumb. You'd probably see the beam encased in a column of white light if it was slamming into all that smoke. The heated air of the particle beam its self causes thermal blooming defocusing the beam robbing them of power before they ultimately reach their targets. So particle beams have a limited range. And are really obvious. They're only not so obvious in low power or the vacuum of space which wouldn't apply here. Particle beams require big bulky accelerators and equipment.
Plasma weapons have similar issues and also require stupid amounts of power.
Basically none of the evidence presented matches with a dew whether it be laser, plasma, particle or even AESA.
And still, a match stick is the most efficient out of all the mentioned options.
Re: Australian fires - formally "NSW fires" thread
Posted: Mon Jan 20, 2020 12:17 pm
by TheBlackStump
Other evidence presented was blocks of car motors melting which takes over 2000 C for this to happen and yet nearby plastic and trees did not burn.
Bushfires do not burn anywhere near 2000 C
Also same pictures taken in California fires of car motor blocks melting.
Re: Australian fires - formally "NSW fires" thread
Posted: Mon Jan 20, 2020 12:28 pm
by TheBlackStump
https://geopolitics.co/2015/06/06/us-ai ... l-weather/
Haarp is what they say has been used in Australia over the past decade at least to deliberately dry out and prep the land for drought ......
Over time HAARP has been progressively set up in all radar stations around Australia using tax payer funds and each radar station can send out the required microwave frequency continuously about 500 km in all directions , a round circle , or an area less than a circle or even a straight line as required at time. It takes hundreds of millions or even bilions of volts of electricity to operate just one HAARP. If/when all HAARP in Australia are activated at same time it turns Australia into a giant microwave oven by heating up the atmosphere and killing off clouds precipitation at same time. The USA and China both have and use this technology and our government allows it to be used here.
SILENT WEAPONS FOR QUIET WARS
https://geopolitics.co/2015/06/06/us-ai ... l-weather/
US AAIR FORCE ADMITS THEY CAN CONTROL THE WEATHER
JUNE 6, 2015 GEOPOLITICS101 154 COMMENTS
The US Air Force and DARPA would like us to believe that they have stopped using HAARP in Alaska for research and experiment. Even then, we all know that there are other HAARP systems out there in the form of radar communication and surveillance systems that are rigged on top of mobile platforms that are deployable in any international waters around the world.
All they need to do is twist a button to change the frequency to microwave range and increase the frequency modulated [FM] transmission power enough to reach and heat up the atmosphere above the target.
The technology is covered under US Patent 4,686,605 on the “Method and Apparatus for Altering a Region in the Earth’s Atmosphere, Ionosphere, and/or Magnetosphere.”
[IMG]
https://patentimages.storage.googleapis ... 686605.pdf
How does it work?
For those who have no technical appetite, just imagine the same frequency signal used in your microwave oven that cooks your breakfast…
[IMG]
… is directed towards the atmosphere from the tip of the antennas in the array shown below.
[IMG]
HAARP Array
[IMG]
Again, the same principle used in the TV, or cell site, broadcast is being used on these HAARP and radar platforms. The only difference in cooking up the sky, as opposed to your breakfast, is that the voltage needed to transmit the same microwave frequency signal is in the range of hundreds of million volts due to the amount of distance that the same signal must traverse between the antenna and the target.
While,
“A typical consumer microwave oven consumes 1,100 W AC and produces 700 W of microwave power, an efficiency of 64%. The other 400 W are dissipated as heat, mostly in the magnetron tube.”
… your government’s HAARP emitter may need 100 billion watts of sheer power, as the patent above has indicated, in order to achieve a specific outcome. There’s no theoretical limit, of course, as to how much ego will play into the process.
What could possibly happen to the preselected region in the atmosphere when enough power is fed to the transmission array?
Understand, that even an increase of just 1 Celsius in the atmospheric temperature is more than enough to initiate a significant weather perturbation. Bear in mind that all gases move from high to low pressure, and gas pressure is directly proportional to its temperature.
In short, if one heats up at least three specific locations in the atmosphere, the common center region having relatively lower pressure than those three heated points will become the eye of the storm. Three competing forces moving towards a common region can only be resolved through a downward spiral rotation, the cooler gases being heavier than the former. Depending on the amount of energy being used, the whole process could take days to develop.
Chemtrailing and cloud seeding could certainly enhance the process far beyond weather manipulation. Notoriously, these maniacs almost always have multiple goals for a single action.
For those who understand frequency modulation, they know that any low frequency signal can be piggybacked into the high frequency radio signal. In short, it is possible to alter human behavior by FM broadcasting brain wave frequencies, to wit:
Re: Australian fires - formally "NSW fires" thread
Posted: Mon Jan 20, 2020 12:32 pm
by TheBlackStump
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beijing_W ... ion_Office
Beijing Weather Modification Office
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Beijing Weather Modification Office
Traditional Chinese 北京市人工影響天氣辦公室
Simplified Chinese 北京市人工影响天气办公室
Beijing Meteorological Bureau tasked with weather control in Beijing, China, and its surrounding areas, including parts of Hebei and Inner Mongolia.[1][2][3]
The Beijing Weather Modification Office form a part of China's nationwide weather control effort, believed to be the world's largest; it employs 37,000 people nationwide, who seed clouds by firing rockets and shells loaded with silver iodide into them.[4] According to Zhang Qiang, head of the Office, cloud seeding increased precipitation in Beijing by about one-eighth in 2004; nationwide, similar efforts added 210 cubic kilometres (7.4×1012 cu ft) of rain between 1995 and 2003.[5]
The work of the Office is largely aimed at hail storm prevention or making rain to end droughts; they have also induced precipitation for purposes of firefighting or counteracting the effect of severe dust storms, as they did in the aftermath of one storm in April 2006 which dropped 300,000 tonnes of dust and sand on the city and was believed to have been the largest in five years.[2][6] Their technology was also used to create snow on New Year's Day in 1997.[7] Other proposed future uses for induced precipitation include lowering temperatures in summer, in hopes of reducing electricity consumption.[5] More prominently, they were enlisted by the Chinese government to ensure that the 2008 Summer Olympics are free of rain, by breaking up clouds headed towards the capital and forcing them to drop rain on outlying areas instead.[4] The office created a snowstorm in November 2009.[8][9]
Weather modification in various forms has been around for some 50 years and has/is being used for good and bad agendas.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weather_modification
Weather modification
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
A weather modification (also known as weather control) is the act of intentionally manipulating or altering the weather. The most common form of weather modification is cloud seeding, which increases rain or snow, usually for the purpose of increasing the local water supply.[1] Weather modification can also have the goal of preventing damaging weather, such as hail or hurricanes, from occurring; or of provoking damaging weather against the enemy, as a tactic of military or economic warfare like Operation Popeye, where clouds were seeded to prolong the monsoon in Vietnam. Weather modification in warfare has been banned by the United Nations under Environmental Modification Convention.
___________________________________________________________
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beijing_W ... ion_Office
Beijing Weather Modification Office
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Beijing Weather Modification Office
Traditional Chinese 北京市人工影響天氣辦公室
Simplified Chinese 北京市人工影响天气办公室
Beijing Meteorological Bureau tasked with weather control in Beijing, China, and its surrounding areas, including parts of Hebei and Inner Mongolia.[1][2][3]
The Beijing Weather Modification Office form a part of China's nationwide weather control effort, believed to be the world's largest; it employs 37,000 people nationwide, who seed clouds by firing rockets and shells loaded with silver iodide into them.[4] According to Zhang Qiang, head of the Office, cloud seeding increased precipitation in Beijing by about one-eighth in 2004; nationwide, similar efforts added 210 cubic kilometres (7.4×1012 cu ft) of rain between 1995 and 2003.[5]
The work of the Office is largely aimed at hail storm prevention or making rain to end droughts; they have also induced precipitation for purposes of firefighting or counteracting the effect of severe dust storms, as they did in the aftermath of one storm in April 2006 which dropped 300,000 tonnes of dust and sand on the city and was believed to have been the largest in five years.[2][6] Their technology was also used to create snow on New Year's Day in 1997.[7] Other proposed future uses for induced precipitation include lowering temperatures in summer, in hopes of reducing electricity consumption.[5] More prominently, they were enlisted by the Chinese government to ensure that the 2008 Summer Olympics are free of rain, by breaking up clouds headed towards the capital and forcing them to drop rain on outlying areas instead.[4] The office created a snowstorm in November 2009.[8][9]
Re: Australian fires - formally "NSW fires" thread
Posted: Mon Jan 20, 2020 1:10 pm
by bassplyr
Poor haarp. Its one of the most contrived and contorted conspiracy cudgel there is these days.
Haarp cant do any of the weather modifications stuff people attribute to it. Harp broadcasts at 2.8-10mhz. high frequency for radio waves are 3-30mhz. Hence the high frequency part of high frequency active aroural research program.
Microwaves are 300mhz to 300 ghz. Microwave ovens are at 2.4 ghz. Far outside the range the haarp can broadcast at.
You cant just turn up the frequency on the haarp. Its an antenna. All antennas are built to specific sizes and shapes to match the wavelength of the frequency they broadcast or receive at. The haarp has little leeway at what it can broadcast frequency wise. The proof is literally in its physical design. It cant come anywhere near heating the atmosphere or controlling weather via that.
Haarp is limited to tickling the ionosphere for...reasons. the ionosphere is a part of our atmosphere really high in the sky. Almost near space. In the parent you listed thats the atmosphere its referring to.
The chinese weather modification is cloud seeding. Something discovered in the 40s. Cloud seedings uses are well understood. It basically forces clouds to drop rain.
Re: Australian fires - formally "NSW fires" thread
Posted: Mon Jan 20, 2020 1:12 pm
by bassplyr
Haarp is still used just not by the military. The military learned what it needed to and has built their own ionosphere tickling antennas around the world.
Re: Australian fires - formally "NSW fires" thread
Posted: Tue Jan 21, 2020 5:37 pm
by Rusty2
TheBlackStump wrote: Mon Jan 20, 2020 5:55 am
I will ring NSW RFS and see if they will give me contact details.
Awesome , I'll check too .
Re: Australian fires - formally "NSW fires" thread
Posted: Fri Jan 24, 2020 8:25 pm
by Black
TheBlackStump wrote: Mon Jan 20, 2020 12:17 pm
Other evidence presented was blocks of car motors melting which takes over 2000 C for this to happen and yet nearby plastic and trees did not burn.
Bushfires do not burn anywhere near 2000 C
Also same pictures taken in California fires of car motor blocks melting.
Black stump, it is true engine blocks will melt at 1500 to 2000 degrees Celsius. It is also true that the highest temperatures reached by this round of Australia's bush fires is about 800 degrees Celsius, and Bush fires in general do not reach temperatures of 1500 to 2000 degrees Celsius.
What is not true is that engine blocks were melting. Have a close look at the photos of the cars with "melted engine blocks." It is melted metal part of the engine blocks, wheel housing, and other metal in the engine bay and part of the cars. That isnt melted engine blocks flowing away on the roadway from the vehicles.
Re: Australian fires - formally "NSW fires" thread
Posted: Mon Jan 27, 2020 7:53 am
by Black
TheBlackStump wrote: Sun Jan 19, 2020 5:17 pm
http://stateofthenation.co/?p=3463
Just like Operation Torch California, hard evidence of DEWs appearing throughout Australian bushfires (Video + Photo Proof)
See pics in above link taken by a Wantagong NSW RFS crew menber
Black stump, you know, I'm no photographic expert, but the "laser beam" in that photo is clearly photoshopped in.
First of all, if you have ever used a powerful laser at night, the laser beam retains a straight line. The laser beam in that fake news photo converges upwards. Second, whilst a laser beam from a powerful laser is easy to see at night, during the day, like in that photo, not so. Thirdly, have a good look at the clouds above where the "laser beam" disappears into. If we were talking about a ray of sunlight piercing a cloud and striking the ground, you would see the ray through the less thick cloud above the dark cloud. Where is the "laser beam" in the less thick cloud above the dark cloud it disappears into? That and no eyewitness account from the fire brigade officer looking in that direction, spells c**p.
I had a look at the article, and held my breath in anticipation looking forward to seeing a photo of a DEW - Directed energy weapon. Ofcourse, no such luck. Just some lazy, incompetent photoshop at it's best.
There is a real life directed energy weapon (directed by mother nature) from the skies, that does cause bushfires though. It's called storm clouds. The "laser beam" is in fact a bolt of lightning, white or blue in color. This same directed energy weapon from the skies is also responsible for extinguishing the bush fires - through rain.
Re: Australian fires - formally "NSW fires" thread
Posted: Fri Jan 31, 2020 12:07 pm
by GregP
Just thought I would add something into this.... there was a mention of engine blocks in a previous post. Most enginge blocks these days are cast aluminium, not iron/steel. Melting point of aluminium is only 660c. I remember seeing photos years ago of the remains of motorbikes after a bushfire... the frames were still intact while underneath was a solidified puddle of aluminium.
Re: Australian fires - formally "NSW fires" thread
Posted: Fri Jan 31, 2020 7:21 pm
by Black
Greg, you've just described the bright silver metal flowing away from those cars caught in the fires. It looks like aluminium, as opposed to dark iron and steel.