Cultural Bias: Bigfoot Lost in Translation
Posted: Thu Apr 16, 2009 4:47 pm
The following article was originally created as a response to Shazzoir’s “Interesting article - Bigfoot interactions” thread but I felt it warranted a topic of it’s own.
Cultural Bias: Bigfoot Lost in Translation
The act of seeking out and incorporating traditional indigenous knowledge has a long and successful history within Western civilization. A wide variety of plants (including timbers and medicines), animals, and minerals have been “discovered”, identified, and utilized with the aid of indigenous knowledge. Indeed, who would know the landscape better than the very people who have lived there for generation after generation?
Indigenous cultures are inevitably oral (i.e. no written language) and often ascribe spiritual beliefs into their world-view. Personifying and spiritualizing creatures, places, and events promotes and intimate and practical knowledge of their domain. However, this can create difficulties and differences in understanding when transferring such traditional knowledge into our modern literal culture.
This is a significant point which is often overlooked or ignored in the field of crypto-hominology - the study of yet unidentified hominids. By all means, it is generally considered desirable to have an “open mind” when researching this phenomenon however such an approach often ignores the effects of cultural bias and promotes blind acceptance of traditional beliefs over critical reasoning which can skew the data towards inappropriate paranormal explanations for what is essentially a zoological problem.
As a case in point, let us examine the belief - widespread (over nearly all the continents) throughout indigenous cultures - that crypto-hominids have “backward facing feet”. What does this actually mean? In our literal Western culture it means that crypto-hominids have their heal at the front of the foot and their toes at the back where the heal should be. With our knowledge of biology it is clear that such a statement cannot be accurate. Indeed, no witness has EVER noted such an abnormality. Does this mean that crypto-hominids are paranormal creations, malformed spirits, or aliens? No. The “backward facing feet” statement does, however, imply meta-meaning - meanings beyond the literal - thus providing several points of practical knowledge - that crypto-hominids:
* are difficult, if not impossible, to track with any reliability.
* promote confusion as part of their evasiveness strategy.
* have sentient intelligence - an awareness of self beyond other animals and more akin with humans.
* are cunning - potentially leading the tracker away from a significant area or towards an ambush.
Thus, other indigenous statements - like how crypto-hominids can “can shift and leave this realm” - would be better served when analysed in a similar manner as above rather than simply taken at face value in a strict literal (Western) sense.
I welcome any debate and comment and would be interested in further non-literal analysis of other indigenous beliefs in regards to crypto-hominology.
Upcoming Article: Schizophrenia and the New Age Bigfoot.
Cultural Bias: Bigfoot Lost in Translation
The act of seeking out and incorporating traditional indigenous knowledge has a long and successful history within Western civilization. A wide variety of plants (including timbers and medicines), animals, and minerals have been “discovered”, identified, and utilized with the aid of indigenous knowledge. Indeed, who would know the landscape better than the very people who have lived there for generation after generation?
Indigenous cultures are inevitably oral (i.e. no written language) and often ascribe spiritual beliefs into their world-view. Personifying and spiritualizing creatures, places, and events promotes and intimate and practical knowledge of their domain. However, this can create difficulties and differences in understanding when transferring such traditional knowledge into our modern literal culture.
This is a significant point which is often overlooked or ignored in the field of crypto-hominology - the study of yet unidentified hominids. By all means, it is generally considered desirable to have an “open mind” when researching this phenomenon however such an approach often ignores the effects of cultural bias and promotes blind acceptance of traditional beliefs over critical reasoning which can skew the data towards inappropriate paranormal explanations for what is essentially a zoological problem.
As a case in point, let us examine the belief - widespread (over nearly all the continents) throughout indigenous cultures - that crypto-hominids have “backward facing feet”. What does this actually mean? In our literal Western culture it means that crypto-hominids have their heal at the front of the foot and their toes at the back where the heal should be. With our knowledge of biology it is clear that such a statement cannot be accurate. Indeed, no witness has EVER noted such an abnormality. Does this mean that crypto-hominids are paranormal creations, malformed spirits, or aliens? No. The “backward facing feet” statement does, however, imply meta-meaning - meanings beyond the literal - thus providing several points of practical knowledge - that crypto-hominids:
* are difficult, if not impossible, to track with any reliability.
* promote confusion as part of their evasiveness strategy.
* have sentient intelligence - an awareness of self beyond other animals and more akin with humans.
* are cunning - potentially leading the tracker away from a significant area or towards an ambush.
Thus, other indigenous statements - like how crypto-hominids can “can shift and leave this realm” - would be better served when analysed in a similar manner as above rather than simply taken at face value in a strict literal (Western) sense.
I welcome any debate and comment and would be interested in further non-literal analysis of other indigenous beliefs in regards to crypto-hominology.
Upcoming Article: Schizophrenia and the New Age Bigfoot.