Yowiehunters Forum

Sensational photo's

Could use a Fab Five makeover though.

Great link thanks.

Cheers Buck

Thanks for the link Cass. Are these genuine do you think or am I getting skeptical in my old age?

I think they're actually a fake, no muscle tone, actions incorrect etc etc

The scrawnyness, the lowbrow and his forehead reminded me reminded me of illustrations I've seen of the Chinese Yeren.

He could be old. Judging by his dangling accessories, his cremaser muscle may be weak. The environment looks cold and they should be up... as per the snowy photo but it's hard to tell. (I feel dirty when I look too long)

His scrawny condition could also be a form of sarcopenia, naturally occuring condition with age where muscle mass, strength and condition deteriorate.

Diet and protien synthesis change with age and can accelerate the conditon.

Here's a link what it is and how to prevent it.

http://www.unm.edu/~lkravitz/Article%20 ... penia.html

Proposed new method for attracting a Sasquatch... leave a set of free weights in the wilderness.

Cheers Buck

No problems Cass.

I thought it's arms looked the right length. (Having never personally seen one, it's a stupid observation) but they looked right... right?

It's bow leggedness could be diet related, could be rickets?

Cheers Buck

Something is not quite right with this photo. As much as I would love for this to be authentic, there is just something about it that disagrees with me.

The first thing I noticed was that it seems to be mostly uniform black. It might just be bad lighting, but that would also make it easily fabricated.

Or it may be it's arms. The right arm seems way out of proportion compared to it's left or even the whole body.

But, then again, if somebody was going to fake a bigfoot photo, I'm pretty sure that they would try to make it look as much like the mainstream bigfoot perception as they could. The creature in this photo is something else entirely.

Old, sick, bow-legged........ could be anything. But if this photo is authentic, Cass and Buck have pretty much got it sussed.

But I'm still not convinced....... That fence is lookin' mighty comfy at the moment.

I have to agree with you Romeo, infact I'll come right out and say that at this stage "I" think those photos are fakes.

Of course I could be entirely wrong, so I'll look into them some more

It's a fake. Totally and utterly. I can't see it being real.

The contrast from the bigfoot to the background is different. There is also "bleeding" around the bigfoot. Which gives it the appearance of glowing. It's not glowing, just bad photoshopping.

The bathing ones look to be natural but my questioning is if the photographer was being charged by one frony on and in the open then where are the other photos of it as it got closer or is it another story that ends with being unprepaired or scared. its not much use if every time theres some evidence put forward these investigators come up short because of something or other. would of been nice to see one at about 20mts i am sure you would still make it to safety. ha ha.

Something odd about these photos. They're too scrawny. Undernourished bigfoot?

Most descriptions I've come across include things like, "barrel chested", "3 feet across the chest" etc etc. I'm expecting to see pics of a creature built like a brick dunny. Arms dont seem long enough either.

Are these a couple of guys in monkey suits?

Folcrom

They are fakes.

Ivan Marx (not to be confused with Ivan Sanderson) is a known hoaxer of Sasquatch reports and photos. He had too many up close and clear photographs over too short a time span.

He is considered a hoaxer by most folks in the Bigfoot/Sasquatch research community.

Well for crying out loud. I wondered what was happening to me, now I know, Im getting old.
Cheers Wally

the pics are from the video "the shadow of bigfoot", if you have not seen the video then you are not missing much. shot by marx it is supposed to be of a "real" bigfoot.it is the most comical piece of film shot of a "real bigfoot" you will ever see, it give bigfoot research a bad name and in an insult to all the researchers out there

[quote="Romeo"]Something is not quite right with this photo. As much as I would love for this to be authentic, there is just something about it that disagrees with me.

The first thing I noticed was that it seems to be mostly uniform black. It might just be bad lighting, but that would also make it easily fabricated.

Or it may be it's arms. The right arm seems way out of proportion compared to it's left or even the whole body.

But, then again, if somebody was going to fake a bigfoot photo, I'm pretty sure that they would try to make it look as much like the mainstream bigfoot perception as they could. The creature in this photo is something else entirely.

Old, sick, bow-legged........ could be anything. But if this photo is authentic, Cass and Buck have pretty much got it sussed.

But I'm still not convinced....... That fence is lookin' mighty comfy at the moment.[/quote]=steven very intresting with the cold climates in america no wonder the big foot has more hair on its body and even the face except the erea where it looks like a long oval shped thats not coverd and looks white, and concidering its arms are very long even when it has a lean to its right its arms are to long to be like humen, the bigfoot looks solid and the shape of it i think its a female as its hips are wider, and its hair or fur looks like that of the black bear, and as for its abilty to shake off so much water like that ,that no humen could do , makes me wonder how water obsorbant its hair really is concidering that if they have more oil in there skins and hair to then they water may not hold in its fur if its oily to but then who knows