New potential bigfoot photo

[sealo]

Hey guys, just came across this, thought you would all be interested.

A potential shot of bigfoot taken on a trailcam in Minnesota, full story here http://www.mercurynews.com/ci_13985245? ... ck_check=1

Thoughts?

Actually they are saying it's definitely a human over on the BFRO, so there ya go, that was quick lol, http://www.bfro.net/mn_photo.asp

[Dion]

Yep defiantly a fake the hair on the arms cuts of quite dramatically and you are left with a rubber hand, smells of suit.

[Mike Williams]

His eye balls are on the back of his head..
Man in suit..where is TYM..

[Shazzoir]

I reckon it's a guy in a suit too.
1. Same colour all over, no paler colours to indicate weathering or naturally bleached colour of hair
2. Look at the straight leg stretched out behind. The leg is the same thickness all the way down from the butt to the 'foot' (which conveniently, you cannot see)
3. If the left leg was that far back, you would think the 'animal' in the photo was striding along. But the right arm isn't in the forward position to balance the impetus of forward movement, as you would see if this was a genuine 'walking' photo.
4. Conveniently, there is a sapling right in front of both the face and 'hand', two of the only parts of a hairy biped that may really give some food for thought. It just looks as if they have posed in front of a camera that has been manually triggered (trail cam? right)

Just my opinion, though.

Shazz

[y0wie]

the face is on the back of its head ??