NASA FOOTAGE

This board is designated for the discussion of UFO's. Not our specialty, however those who do and have a voice to be heard, can speak freely here.
Post Reply
User avatar
SAB 8
Gold Status - Frequent Poster
Posts: 401
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 5:20 pm
Position: Paranormal Researcher
Contact:

NASA FOOTAGE

Unread post by SAB 8 »

You know it seems to me that no amount of photographic or video evidence taken by the general public will convince sceptics that UFOs are real. They`ll find an explanation for just about anything...... no matter how ridiculous the explanations (or even unscientific) they give, they seem to go to extroadinary lengths to debunk the notion that extraterrestrial intellgences are visiting the planet. Take the Condon Report (conclusion of Project Blue Book) as an example. Half of the explanations they gave went something like this:

The object was a meteor skipping off the magnetosphere triggering ionic plasma eruptions in the upper atmosphere which illuminated swamp gas that happened to be in close proximity to the witness. Case closed.

Even then they still had a significant number of unidentified cases.

However, explaining away NASA footage is a whole different ball game. For starters you can immiediately cross off hoaxing which basically leaves you with misidentifications. Check out the following footage - while I think that some of this footage may be natural phenomena or image artifacts I believe much of it clearly demonstrates that we are being visited by extraterrestrial (or extradimensional) intelligences who possess extremely advanced technology. Check it out:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WlLN_Jcg1pc

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X-RPWhigpQg

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CnTzdwMT0g4

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4qM3xOu9HRU

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... 5688871589

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e0jpUPLqLhA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XqMf3tow ... re=related
Rules of debunking
Any conventional explanation is better than none.
Don`t bother me with the facts my mind is made up.
If one can`t attack the data, attack the people, it is easier!
Do one`s research by proclamation; investigation is too much trouble.
Ella
Silver Status
Posts: 236
Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 12:36 am
Position: Flesh and Blood
Gender: Female
Location: San Marcos, TX, USA

Re: NASA FOOTAGE

Unread post by Ella »

They could also be video artifacts, but hey--in our society (meaning at least the English-speaking world), the culture of denial is total.

I've seen what I believe to be genuine UFOs, but I can't prove it and don't GAS whether anybody believed my reports--actually just the first time I ever reported one, and got laughed off the planet--and I don't GAS what anybody thinks. In the USA, even Bigfoot reports are better received than UFO sightings, let alone somebody getting abducted. Well, I've never been abducted, but over the years I've met a lot of abductees who were perfectly credible to me. So don't worry about what anybody thinks. If you know you're telling the truth, let that suffice. (alien)

Are you familiar with Whitley Strieber? His web site is unknowncountry.com. He wrote the Communion series of books about his abduction experiences. Believe it or not, as you wish. I mostly just post on his Cryptozoology forum. (taz)
We have met the aliens and they are us.
User avatar
SAB 8
Gold Status - Frequent Poster
Posts: 401
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 5:20 pm
Position: Paranormal Researcher
Contact:

Re: NASA FOOTAGE

Unread post by SAB 8 »

I first came upon this attached image on the Luna Cognita You Tube site.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WlLN_Jcg1pc

Out of curiousity I searched for the image and sure enough there it was. Load this image in HD and you clearly see an image of a UFO on the ISS science officer`s screen. Now is this just pretty wallpaper or something else. Either way, I find this image ABSOLUTELY amazing/bizarre. Would be curious to know what other people think.

http://www.spaceflight.nasa.gov/gallery ... 40000.html
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Rules of debunking
Any conventional explanation is better than none.
Don`t bother me with the facts my mind is made up.
If one can`t attack the data, attack the people, it is easier!
Do one`s research by proclamation; investigation is too much trouble.
Post Reply