Page 1 of 1
Kelly Cahill, encounter 1993
Posted: Sun Sep 26, 2010 6:50 pm
by PURE PANTHER
Hey everyone,
one time me and my mum were driving through Narre Warren North when she said: ïn that paddock there one of my friends was abducted by aliens.
At first i thought pfft yeah right then she told me the story of it and still i thought nahh not possible so i looked into it and found this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UeBIqChvNXw
hope you enjoy it, let me know what you think: fact or fiction???

Re: Kelly Cahill, encounter 1993
Posted: Mon Sep 27, 2010 3:33 pm
by Rusty2
Hey PUREPANTHER ,
She certainly seem's credible . I've had dream's of abduction's since I was a kid . It's scary stuff . Ever noticed these abduction's seem to happen on open undulating hill's type of area's . You wouldn't catch me stopping lol .
Thank's for that Rusty2...............
Re: Kelly Cahill, encounter 1993
Posted: Mon Sep 27, 2010 4:10 pm
by PURE PANTHER
Hahaha, yes i think i would keep on driving aswell.
and yes i have noticed that a lot of reports come from open paddocks and clear grassland... very strange :/
Re: Kelly Cahill, encounter 1993
Posted: Mon Sep 27, 2010 10:08 pm
by Mike Williams
It was an interesting case..but..I cannot remember if she could ever recollect the beings before or possibly after hypnosis.
The voice over even says "kelly says it wasnt until weeks later that she "remembered" getting out of the car that night".
So that means no memory of aliens/stopping/other cars etc..until weeks later..which is strange.
The other witnesses Jane,glenda and bill were never interviewed by anyone other than supposedly one person...
There was never any proof they actually existed.
The ground traces were primarily from a magnetometer..yet that story fell apart when the person who claimed to have borrowed the device and made measurements could not even prove he had the device and refused to elaborate to multiple questions..the farmers who owned the land were never approached for permission..etc etc etc
This one "researcher" bumbled the whole case which became a complete debacle..
I do think kelly was a good witness..!! and appears to be sincere and honest..
Mike
Re: Kelly Cahill, encounter 1993
Posted: Tue Sep 28, 2010 1:44 am
by SAB 8
I read the book on this encounter and I have to say it was amazing to me for several reasons. The types of ETs in the encounter.... they are not the conventional Greys but I am aware of several international reports describing similar beings.... the majority of wood-be researchers or even hoaxers would not be aware of this.
Also, the encounter itself was somewhat bizarre and implied that the beings were 'negative'. I have read a lot of abduction accounts but this one is definitely one of the more stranger ones I`ve read about.
I thought it was interesting that there was a similar case in Victoria (again, on the out edges of Melbourne) 11 months later (July, 1994)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VJwBFmM_8aw. There were a lot of similarities including the car stalking, the description of the craft, and even repeated encounters in the preceeding weeks.
It was an interesting case..but..I cannot remember if she could ever recollect the beings before or possibly after hypnosis.
The voice over even says "kelly says it wasnt until weeks later that she "remembered" getting out of the car that night".
So that means no memory of aliens/stopping/other cars etc..until weeks later..which is strange
She remembered observing the UFO.... but didn`t remember the ET component until later.
The other witnesses Jane,glenda and bill were never interviewed by anyone other than supposedly one person...
There was never any proof they actually existed.
The ground traces were primarily from a magnetometer..yet that story fell apart when the person who claimed to have borrowed the device and made measurements could not even prove he had the device and refused to elaborate to multiple questions..the farmers who owned the land were never approached for permission..etc etc etc
This one "researcher" bumbled the whole case which became a complete debacle..
I do think kelly was a good witness..!! and appears to be sincere and honest..
Yer, it appears that the research methedology was somewhat questionable.... if these 'other witnesses' actually exist which I`ll give the researcher involved the benefit of the doubt that they do.... then this is a groundbreaking case as their independent recollections and drawings verify Cahill`s testimony.
Re: Kelly Cahill, encounter 1993
Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 9:28 pm
by Yowie88
I have met Kelly (had a codie with her and others) at a UFO Conference in western Sydney and she seemed credible and determined to find closure. The determination was written all over her face.
When a group of us were having drinks with her after her talk we were sussing her, trying to look for clues to see if their were any holes in her character; we
could not fault her in any way. You get a sense if someone is spinning you bull when you spend time with them.
What annoyed me about the case was the research seemed to peter-off and die; for example, why did the Uni suddenly stop their research into the traces found, and as indicated by Mike, what happened to asking the farmer for permission. I first heard about this case on a show called "the Extraordinary", and I made a pack to make dam sure I was in that conference room when she decided to give talks on it.
Something went down that night and its a multi witness case.
Re: Kelly Cahill, encounter 1993
Posted: Tue Nov 02, 2010 9:53 am
by PURE PANTHER
Yowie88 wrote:
Something went down that night and its a multi witness case.
Yes i totally agree, the peices of the puzzle just dont add up
