Yowiehunters Forum

hi everyone...begining next month is the doco...is it real..its on the national geographic channel. they start on the first saturday of sept,and they repeat a few times during the month.1 hour each episode.ufos,ghosts,crop circles ,lake monsters and all our favourate..BIGFOOT...a word of warning though..every episode is based on proving it is all a load of bunk...the series of episodes is nothing but to debunk the subjects..bye for now..

hi everyone....just to see how one sided the shows will be, this is how they describe the series in the foxtel magazine.......quote.."This series debunks the malarkey and methodically bursts the bubble of incredible tales.through science and common sense national geographic channel puts these fables to the test,and ultimately to rest."...cant get anymore one sided than that eh? on the bigfoot episode they have the man who claims to be the person in the suit in the patterson footage,they put him in a suit and they recreate the scene.they claim to put the patterson footage to rest once and for all. don't i feel like an idiot...here i am thinking bigfoot and ufos and ghosts were real,when all the time national geo have known all along its all aload of bunk...lol

If its the one i've been told about, Bob H does a better job proving he wasn't the guy in the suit.

I don't want to ruin the show, so I will leave it their


I use to despise these sort of shows, but over time Iv'e found, there will always be people that don't believe, Even if one ran past them.

Then you will get the people that will see a show like this and then believe its all fake, but if you talk to them and explane both sides of the coin, they are atleast open to the possibility of them being out their. Which is all you can really ask people to think, if they haven't seen one for themselves.

It doesn't matter if a show was Pro or against bigfoot, it will generate alot of attention, and most likely more reports

Just because it looks bad for us on the outside, doesn't mean their wont be some good aspects and that in the end out weight the bad parts

these debunking documentaries sometimes really get under my skin.like a lot of journalist based work,it is put together with a certain agenda,a direction of argument pre-programmed,so the dumbies watching assume that there is no other possibility for the unexplained,other than the 'proof",that they are served up by these great documentary presenters.i'll watch it,iguess,until it really shits me

I've always found this interesting. So the "big shiela" in the Patterson film was a bloke in a suite? Well in that case, they'd need to have two of them.

In some of the clips taken from the film, a 2nd "big fella" is up on the hill, in the woods, waiting for his girl to catch up. Its not entirely clear, but does indeed look like there are two of them on the film. Most people never hear about the second one.

Folcrom.