New Photo Feb 2016

This board is open for all matters and discussions pertaining to the Australian Yowie. Please keep on topic in this forum.
User avatar
Ray Doherty
Long Time Contributor
Posts: 804
Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2011 7:26 am
Position: Researcher
Facebook Profile Page: www.facebook.com/theaustralianyowieproject
Location: North Brisbane

New Photo Feb 2016

Unread post by Ray Doherty »

I have been reluctant to post this photo I captured in a location North of Brisbane back in february. 3 of us, me, my daughter who freaked out and another fellow, observed this critter watching us. After I took the photo it got up and walked off deep into the mangrove forest. Yes, this was taken at a mangrove. Lesson here is dont take my kid again as I could follow this fellow because she want to return to safety

It was taken on a Cannon 600D on tripod 500MM signma lens. Will edited this with full shot details later. Please find below both photos that have been zoomed and cropped for better viewing. They are a little low res in order to load them here. The object was at around 60 meters from us. we spotted it first by movement, then bino's before getting the camera on him. He sat in this spot for a few minutes before taking off.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
'I want to believe'
macquariedave

Re: New Photo Feb 2016

Unread post by macquariedave »

Ray Doherty wrote:I have been reluctant to post this photo I captured in a location North of Brisbane back in february. 3 of us, me, my daughter who freaked out and another fellow, observed this critter watching us. After I took the photo it got up and walked off deep into the mangrove forest. Yes, this was taken at a mangrove. Lesson here is dont take my kid again as I could follow this fellow because she want to return to safety

It was taken on a Cannon 600D on tripod 500MM signma lens. Will edited this with full shot details later. Please find below both photos that have been zoomed and cropped for better viewing. They are a little low res in order to load them here. The object was at around 60 meters from us. we spotted it first by movement, then bino's before getting the camera on him. He sat in this spot for a few minutes before taking off.
Surely you can load them substantially bigger than that? Or stick the full size ones somewhere (Dropbox?) and provide links?
User avatar
Ray Doherty
Long Time Contributor
Posts: 804
Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2011 7:26 am
Position: Researcher
Facebook Profile Page: www.facebook.com/theaustralianyowieproject
Location: North Brisbane

Re: New Photo Feb 2016

Unread post by Ray Doherty »

Im about to go to work, tomorrow i will try loand near full size one, my internet is not the best but I will try
'I want to believe'
User avatar
ChrisV
Long Time Contributor
Posts: 625
Joined: Mon Nov 10, 2014 3:28 pm

Re: New Photo Feb 2016

Unread post by ChrisV »

Not sure what I am looking at there. Can see something of a charcoal colour but nothing more than that.

Was there sound attached to this experience...maybe its a case that hearing the story in depth might help shape the picture.
User avatar
Ray Doherty
Long Time Contributor
Posts: 804
Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2011 7:26 am
Position: Researcher
Facebook Profile Page: www.facebook.com/theaustralianyowieproject
Location: North Brisbane

Re: New Photo Feb 2016

Unread post by Ray Doherty »

Well it was tough to photo it was a gray afternoon, as i said this is why I was reluctant to put it up, not the best photo
however thought I would put it up for interests sake
'I want to believe'
User avatar
Rusty2
Long Time Contributor
Posts: 1784
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2010 5:30 pm
Position: Believer
Location: East Coast

Re: New Photo Feb 2016

Unread post by Rusty2 »

I see it pretty clearly , certainly looks like a primate .
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Mad Academic
Silver Status
Posts: 186
Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2015 5:27 pm
Location: Worldwide

Re: New Photo Feb 2016

Unread post by Mad Academic »

Ray Doherty wrote:Well it was tough to photo it was a gray afternoon, as i said this is why I was reluctant to put it up, not the best photo
however thought I would put it up for interests sake
Ray,
Thanks for posting. Did you take an "after" photo without the thing there, for comparison?

MA
Yowie bait
Long Time Contributor
Posts: 2530
Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2016 5:06 pm
Position: Believer

Re: New Photo Feb 2016

Unread post by Yowie bait »

Good one Rusty. I can see it. Thanks for posting your pic Ray. Nice catch!
Yowie Bait
macquariedave

Re: New Photo Feb 2016

Unread post by macquariedave »

Rusty2 wrote:I see it pretty clearly , certainly looks like a primate .
Oh come on, it's pure "blob-squatch"!
wellymon
Gold Status - Frequent Poster
Posts: 304
Joined: Wed Aug 14, 2013 10:59 am
Position: Believer

Re: New Photo Feb 2016

Unread post by wellymon »

Yeah I can see exactly what Rusty has explained.

Great spotting Ray. (ninja)

Thanks for sharing. (thumb up)
macquariedave

Re: New Photo Feb 2016

Unread post by macquariedave »

wellymon wrote:Yeah I can see exactly what Rusty has explained.

Great spotting Ray. (ninja)

Thanks for sharing. (thumb up)
You're all just seeing what you want to see in these totally indistinct images - it could be anything. It's sad.
Starks
Approved Member
Posts: 8
Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2015 1:14 am
Position: New Member
Location: Sunshine Coast

Re: New Photo Feb 2016

Unread post by Starks »

macquariedave wrote:
wellymon wrote:Yeah I can see exactly what Rusty has explained.

Great spotting Ray. (ninja)

Thanks for sharing. (thumb up)
You're all just seeing what you want to see in these totally indistinct images - it could be anything. It's sad.
I agree with you Dave, Im just not seeing it, could be anything.

Not discredit to Ray , I just cant see it.

That elusive clear picture still evades us all.
Yowie bait
Long Time Contributor
Posts: 2530
Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2016 5:06 pm
Position: Believer

Re: New Photo Feb 2016

Unread post by Yowie bait »

macquariedave wrote:
wellymon wrote:Yeah I can see exactly what Rusty has explained.

Great spotting Ray. (ninja)

Thanks for sharing. (thumb up)
You're all just seeing what you want to see in these totally indistinct images - it could be anything. It's sad.
Have a good look Dave. Its fuzzy but once you find it then you can see the forehead,hair and eyes at least.
Yowie Bait
macquariedave

Re: New Photo Feb 2016

Unread post by macquariedave »

Yowie bait wrote:
macquariedave wrote:
wellymon wrote:Yeah I can see exactly what Rusty has explained.

Great spotting Ray. (ninja)

Thanks for sharing. (thumb up)
You're all just seeing what you want to see in these totally indistinct images - it could be anything. It's sad.
Have a good look Dave. Its fuzzy but once you find it then you can see the forehead,hair and eyes at least.
Of course YOU can - that's my point . . . or are you being sarcastic also?
Yowie bait
Long Time Contributor
Posts: 2530
Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2016 5:06 pm
Position: Believer

Re: New Photo Feb 2016

Unread post by Yowie bait »

No sarcasm there from me Dave. I can see what theyre talking about with that second shot Rusty posted. I can understand if anyone can't see it. Took me ages to pick it up but can see it well now. Its half a face of something. Looks like a mate of mine actually but better lookin!
Yowie Bait
User avatar
Dion
Forum Moderator
Posts: 2177
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 1:44 pm
Position: Researcher

Re: New Photo Feb 2016

Unread post by Dion »

Respect to all researchers

But......could be anything.
“The day science begins to study non-physical phenomena, it will make more progress in one decade than in all the previous centuries of its existence.” - Nikola Tesla

User formally known as chewy
User avatar
Searcher
Long Time Contributor
Posts: 847
Joined: Thu Mar 20, 2014 12:18 pm

Re: New Photo Feb 2016

Unread post by Searcher »

Dave … perhaps you are missing the main point here. It’s clear Ray , his daughter and the ‘other fellow’ had a good sighting… and close enough to freak his daughter out!

He admits the photos he took are not brilliant. However, it does help validate this sighting from a very experienced member on this forum. So what can we actually see? Not much as it turns out although the second photo to me shows what could be part of the creature’s hairy body in the bottom half of screen. A high res. Original could offer a lot more definition.

Ray, I’m sure your camera has a switch to video mode. That may have been more beneficial than a still, particularly as you were using a tripod, as it will show telltale movement and give you the option of selecting from possibly 1000’s of HD frames.

Anyway Ray, thanks for sharing and if you can find a way to post the full size originals, then I look forward to seeing them. Just a tip. If anyone is going Yowie hunting with a camera, be sure to change your settings so you can capture the largest file size possible. Detail in pictures is everything!
User avatar
ChrisV
Long Time Contributor
Posts: 625
Joined: Mon Nov 10, 2014 3:28 pm

Re: New Photo Feb 2016

Unread post by ChrisV »

Its very indistinct.
I appreciate Ray posting the pic. I know that pics like this can have a divided response.
I could imagine that was Rusty pointed could be the figure but its still a little vague to clarify exactly what it is....
Yowie bait
Long Time Contributor
Posts: 2530
Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2016 5:06 pm
Position: Believer

Re: New Photo Feb 2016

Unread post by Yowie bait »

This is what im seeing. If this isnt what Ray saw and Rusty pointed out then im not seeing it either.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Yowie Bait
macquariedave

Re: New Photo Feb 2016

Unread post by macquariedave »

Searcher wrote:Dave … perhaps you are missing the main point here. It’s clear Ray , his daughter and the ‘other fellow’ had a good sighting… and close enough to freak his daughter out!

He admits the photos he took are not brilliant. However, it does help validate this sighting from a very experienced member on this forum. So what can we actually see? Not much as it turns out although the second photo to me shows what could be part of the creature’s hairy body in the bottom half of screen. A high res. Original could offer a lot more definition.

Ray, I’m sure your camera has a switch to video mode. That may have been more beneficial than a still, particularly as you were using a tripod, as it will show telltale movement and give you the option of selecting from possibly 1000’s of HD frames.

Anyway Ray, thanks for sharing and if you can find a way to post the full size originals, then I look forward to seeing them. Just a tip. If anyone is going Yowie hunting with a camera, be sure to change your settings so you can capture the largest file size possible. Detail in pictures is everything!
I fully appreciate and accept and others with him had a genuine sighting. I've been just saying I don't see it shown clearly in the photographic evidence provided, and I'm not going start pretending I do.

PS Was walking with a group on the firetrails and walking trails above and west of Point Clare - Woy Woy week before last. Kept my eyes and camera out for any possible suspicious tracks or branch constructions, but saw nothing.
User avatar
Tuckeroo
Silver Status
Posts: 249
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2016 11:29 am
Position: Nature Lover
Location: northen rivers nsw

Re: New Photo Feb 2016

Unread post by Tuckeroo »

Ray Doherty wrote:Well it was tough to photo it was a gray afternoon, as i said this is why I was reluctant to put it up, not the best photo
however thought I would put it up for interests sake

Hi Ray, It's surprising how we all see different things in photos. My eyes always struggle with the
negative and positive space, trying to see through the foreground at what is supposed to be there.
It's also effected if you alter the contrast, things appear and recede.

I've highlighted the image where I think the figure is behind the branch looking to the right of the pic.
In the secong image is the full body shot that I kept on seeing.

T.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
macquariedave

Re: New Photo Feb 2016

Unread post by macquariedave »

Tuckeroo wrote:
Ray Doherty wrote:Well it was tough to photo it was a gray afternoon, as i said this is why I was reluctant to put it up, not the best photo
however thought I would put it up for interests sake

Hi Ray, It's surprising how we all see different things in photos. My eyes always struggle with the
negative and positive space, trying to see through the foreground at what is supposed to be there.
It's also effected if you alter the contrast, things appear and recede.

I've highlighted the image where I think the figure is behind the branch looking to the right of the pic.
In the secong image is the full body shot that I kept on seeing.

T.
If you had been handed these images without any other information, i.e. "there's a yowie there somewhere", would you have been able to "see" anything meaningful? You're choosing to identify something merely because you've been told there's something there to see and where to look.
User avatar
Tuckeroo
Silver Status
Posts: 249
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2016 11:29 am
Position: Nature Lover
Location: northen rivers nsw

Re: New Photo Feb 2016

Unread post by Tuckeroo »

[quote]You're choosing to identify something merely because you've been told there's something there to see and where to look



What you say is correct Dave, you kind of read between the lines in my post. It can be about what’s suggested.
I think the large figure I outlined comes from the patterson-gimlin shape burnt into my memory.
I also saw this long grey haired figure also.
I believe Ray saw something that day but he doesn’t go into any detail about how much of the creature he saw
as it ‘got up and walked off deep into the mangrove forest’.

Sounds like your knee is healing up, you’ve been out walking in another beautiful part of Australia.


T.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
Scarts
Gold Status - Frequent Poster
Posts: 352
Joined: Sat Aug 31, 2013 7:33 am
Position: Researcher

Re: New Photo Feb 2016

Unread post by Scarts »

Whether Ray saw something or not, only Ray knows. Seeing has a lot to do with perceiving and then the way the brain interprets the information received.

I think it's reasonable to say the photos Ray has taken, do not accurately reflect Ray's interpretation of what he was seeing. There's nothing in the photos.
User avatar
Brindabella Ranger
Silver Status
Posts: 138
Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2014 8:40 am
Position: Flesh and Blood

Re: New Photo Feb 2016

Unread post by Brindabella Ranger »

There's nothing wrong with the quality of the picture. It's simply a case of zero depth of field, or most likely, because of the density of the mangroves an automatic focus issue. Look at the moss-covered tree to the left of the picture - it's in perfect focus. Ray - pity you didn't use a manual focus on it. But understand things were time critical and you snapped what you could.
Thanks for sharing.
The limits of our perceived world is constrained only by the inability to believe.
macquariedave

Re: New Photo Feb 2016

Unread post by macquariedave »

Scarts wrote:Whether Ray saw something or not, only Ray knows. Seeing has a lot to do with perceiving and then the way the brain interprets the information received.

I think it's reasonable to say the photos Ray has taken, do not accurately reflect Ray's interpretation of what he was seeing. There's nothing in the photos.
Now even I wasn't that absolute, just that IF there was something there, I wasn't seeing it.

What about this?:
https://sasquatchchronicles.com/interes ... aptured-3/
User avatar
Scarts
Gold Status - Frequent Poster
Posts: 352
Joined: Sat Aug 31, 2013 7:33 am
Position: Researcher

Re: New Photo Feb 2016

Unread post by Scarts »

There's absolutely no yowie in those photos. That's clear. If Ray saw one, he didn't photograph it. End of story.
macquariedave

Re: New Photo Feb 2016

Unread post by macquariedave »

Scarts wrote:There's absolutely no yowie in those photos. That's clear. If Ray saw one, he didn't photograph it. End of story.
That's it folks, the mighty know-all Scarts has spoken, you can all pack-up and go home now.
User avatar
Scarts
Gold Status - Frequent Poster
Posts: 352
Joined: Sat Aug 31, 2013 7:33 am
Position: Researcher

Re: New Photo Feb 2016

Unread post by Scarts »

I stated my opinion.

Why tiptoe around the obvious? If I wanted to, I could play where's wally and identify a hundred potential yowie bits and pieces in those photos, the photos are so blurry and shapes so ambiguous. Two people have already outlined what they thought was ray's yowie, and they were off the track.

The latest craze on this site appears to be people declaring they have million dollar photos, only to reveal their blurry photos of blades of grass, leaves, and branches. Absolute bs.
wellymon
Gold Status - Frequent Poster
Posts: 304
Joined: Wed Aug 14, 2013 10:59 am
Position: Believer

Re: New Photo Feb 2016

Unread post by wellymon »

You both stated your own opinions from the start.

Stop bitching about nothing, like little girls.

Both of you go find a photo from your own observations and document here, otherwise move on please. (2guns)
Post Reply