Yowiehunters Forum

A little video for those interested.

Dr. Jonh Bindernagel - Conference Presentation to Biology Professionals

Note how he talks about documenting evidence and being deferential.

TrevorPeters wrote:A little video for those interested.

Dr. Jonh Bindernagel - Conference Presentation to Biology Professionals

Note how he talks about documenting evidence and being deferential.

Thanks Trevor for the link. He had some good photos of recent tracks in the snow;
something scarce for Australian researches.
A stride length of almost 6ft would mean the squatch would have to be 8-9 foot tall.

A strange thing is how each track is in line with the other. You would think something
so big and lumbering would sway sometimes on uneven ground or debris underfoot
and cause some prints to be out of pattern or poorly formed.
This makes me think it wasn’t done by something moving slow but something moving fast.


T.

I felt sorry for the poor bugger, standing up there in the dark and trying to convince his peers to be more open minded about bigfoot.

The illustrations for the proposed sasquatch entry into the field journal were excellent and if that near mile long trackway is legit , thats pretty amazing!

Nice video footage in his "sasquatch witness interviews in a remote villiage" video .

Interesting how he's at the stage of wanting to have Sasquatch in their mammal field guides. Makes sense to help people identify what they saw - bear V Sasquatch.

Tuckeroo wrote:

TrevorPeters wrote:A little video for those interested.

Dr. Jonh Bindernagel - Conference Presentation to Biology Professionals

Note how he talks about documenting evidence and being deferential.

Thanks Trevor for the link. He had some good photos of recent tracks in the snow;
something scarce for Australian researches.
A stride length of almost 6ft would mean the squatch would have to be 8-9 foot tall.

A strange thing is how each track is in line with the other. You would think something
so big and lumbering would sway sometimes on uneven ground or debris underfoot
and cause some prints to be out of pattern or poorly formed.
This makes me think it wasn’t done by something moving slow but something moving fast.


T.

Slow or fast, apparently Sasquatch has an in-line trackway... this is one giveaway of faked tracks, when they are not in line (according to Bear and Coonbo any way).

Wolf wrote:

Tuckeroo wrote:

TrevorPeters wrote:A little video for those interested.

Dr. Jonh Bindernagel - Conference Presentation to Biology Professionals

Note how he talks about documenting evidence and being deferential.

Thanks Trevor for the link. He had some good photos of recent tracks in the snow;
something scarce for Australian researches.
A stride length of almost 6ft would mean the squatch would have to be 8-9 foot tall.

A strange thing is how each track is in line with the other. You would think something
so big and lumbering would sway sometimes on uneven ground or debris underfoot
and cause some prints to be out of pattern or poorly formed.
This makes me think it wasn’t done by something moving slow but something moving fast.


T.

Slow or fast, apparently Sasquatch has an in-line trackway... this is one giveaway of faked tracks, when they are not in line (according to Bear and Coonbo any way).

Don’t know how something with a big hairy frame and strainer post legs can leave such precise tracks, each print perfectly aligned behind the other.

T.

The famous yeti tracks in a straight line in the snow are similar. It would be a tiring hoax and youd have to wipe your own prints after.

Tuckeroo wrote:

Wolf wrote:

Tuckeroo wrote:
A strange thing is how each track is in line with the other. You would think something
so big and lumbering would sway sometimes on uneven ground or debris underfoot
and cause some prints to be out of pattern or poorly formed.
This makes me think it wasn’t done by something moving slow but something moving fast.


T.

Slow or fast, apparently Sasquatch has an in-line trackway... this is one giveaway of faked tracks, when they are not in line (according to Bear and Coonbo any way).

Don’t know how something with a big hairy frame and strainer post legs can leave such precise tracks, each print perfectly aligned behind the other.

T.

You can sort of see it in Patty's walk. The lower leg lifts, then swings forward and across in front without straightening the leg.
If you think about it, each foot following a more or less straight line makes sense for a larger animal utilising smaller, narrow game trails through bush. I know I have followed small wallaby trails through long grass by placing one foot in front of the other, you are forced to by the narrowness of the trail.