Yowiehunters Forum

Just a new member joining the foorum, my question is how much evidence do we need to prove these animals exist.
I have had 5 seperate hair samples identified as being from a higher primate and are the same as Sasquatch /bigfoot hairs that have been collected in USA.

Hi Paul...
Where you been, you should have gone with Tony.!!

MikeW

Hi Mike
Yes, I was quite prepaired to go but had a job offer I couldn't refuse, maybe next year. I'd like to show these yanks up, I have been posting to the BF forum and I think they may be a bit peeved at what I have got and they don't.
I'm going to to give them a miss and decided on joining with these guys.
Maybe get a few questions answered if anyone is interested.
I will post a few more questions tonight and maybe get this forrum buzzing.

According to the Australian Septic Society, nothing less than a body.

DMH

So where has the hair come from,the hair was identified as being from a higher primate and are the same as the Sasquatch/bigfoot hairs that have been collected in USA, we don't have any primates here apart from humans.
YOU TELL ME

I don't know Paul, I haven't seen the report. Feel free to share it with us. Sounds interesting.

DMH

Dean Harrison wrote:I don't know Paul, I haven't seen the report. Feel free to share it with us. Sounds interesting.

DMH

I wasn't going to post them on site but I will it might just help some people get a grasp that these animals are here. I will post tonight.

Howdy
The problem with hair is they have nothing to compare it to. The same can be said for DNA without a known example to compare it to it will always be a known sample. The can say it is related to a ape or even related to humans but they can not say what it is without a known sample.
That is why a body dead or alive is needed so bad. Then they would have a known sample to compare things to.

I have said for many years that only 1 body be it dead or alive is needed. After that they should be protected from any harm from humans. But until that first body is gotten I have no problem with someone trying to kill one. My personal opinion is one will be hit by a car or truck or something. That or some hunter will get one without even looking for one.
If I had to bet on things I would bet that more then one has already been killed in some way and the people was scared to report it or they did report it and it was covered up.

Micahn wrote:Howdy
The problem with hair is they have nothing to compare it to. The same can be said for DNA without a known example to compare it to it will always be a known sample. The can say it is related to a ape or even related to humans but they can not say what it is without a known sample.
That is why a body dead or alive is needed so bad. Then they would have a known sample to compare things to.

I have said for many years that only 1 body be it dead or alive is needed. After that they should be protected from any harm from humans. But until that first body is gotten I have no problem with someone trying to kill one. My personal opinion is one will be hit by a car or truck or something. That or some hunter will get one without even looking for one.
If I had to bet on things I would bet that more then one has already been killed in some way and the people was scared to report it or they did report it and it was covered up.

That is correct with what your saying about the hair,
but I have is hair that is not human it has been identified as being from a higher primate.
As we all know in Oz we don't have any primates that are known to man.
Just the word higher primate suggests that, "hey there is something here."
I didn't say the were the same as sasquatch hair, the best guy to identify primate hair has stated that.