Yowiehunters Forum

Found this new addition to the BFRO site called Jacobs Photos. http://www.bfro.net/avevid/jacobs/jacobs_photos.asp

It seems to show an apparent adolescent Sasquatch caught on infrared camera in Northwest Pennsylvania.

Observations:

First Pic: Is two Bears No Doubt about it.

Second Pic: The second pic doesn’t in my opinion look like a bear as the arms are a little different and a bit to long, you can also make out a cone shaped head if looked at closely. The legs are different to and have a decidedly human thigh and calf look about them.

Third Pic: This is strange one, the posture is a little odd. He appears to be kneeling down and picking something up off the ground. His front left arm has a definite ape like feel to it as his wrist or fingers are bent inwards like one would walk on all fours if one was an ape. His arms seem decidedly longer in this pic also

Opinion: Man I suit, Maybe? at least its not another Blobsquatch.

Great find Chewy, and you've pretty much summed it up.

I like the second pic. It's not a bear and the posture is not that of a human. At first glance, it really appears genuine.

I'm not sure what to make of the last one. Could be kneeling with it's face to the ground.....I can't be certain.

We can't rule out the possibilty of a hoax, however this is a mighty good one if it is. I would have liked to see some video to see how it moves as well, hopefully the BFRO are way ahead of me.

Hi Chewy / Romeo

Who says it on this Message Board, that photographs of Yowies are blurry because they are blurry?

Same goes for photo 2 & 3. They are too blurry to tell.

But, did you notice the animal in the foreground in shots 2 & 3 is exactly the same without any movement at all. I find that very strange, especially when the creature itself has moved considerably.

Big Cats

That would be Alex.

The photos are definitely not clear enough to come to an accurate conclusion, but if they turn out to be genuine, I think there's enough evidence to suggest that something out of the ordinary has been captured on film. At the moment the is no way to tell if they are genuine or not so I'd say it's anyones guess.

I think that black area in the foreground of the photo that you're refering to Paul is the black plate that was once under the mineral lick. I think one of the bear cubs has pushed it over.

This would have to be one of the least convincing 'sasquatch' pics, especially given the first photo... What are we supposed to be lead to believe here, that a young bear suddenly somehow metamophises through crysalis into a baby Sasquatch?

I am sure I could probably photoshop those images a little more convincingly!

yep, something very interesting. i love it.
i would like to see more, and video would be nice.
i cant believe there are so many critics out there, whether it is a fake or not, we possibly will never know. NEVER.
but remember, if we actually get one on film, we will be criticised as fake, no matter how good the details. keep an open mind, if its fake, its interesting, if its real, what a lucky guy who has the photo's. the world isn't going to take him seriously ever. until there is a dead one on the lab table, then, that too will be discredited, analised and explained logically. the rest of the world doesnt want to believe. whether we believe or not, it wont change the world's opinion.

Things are starting to get exiting.

The series of photos on the BFRO website were taken some time apart. It helps to check the timestamps. First the bear cubs showed up. Later the unclassified primate.

The more our technology lets us photograph animals in the wild, without us actually being there, the more chance of catching cryptids in action.

As more and more of these devices are put into service, the odds of finally settling the questions becomes far better.

Folcrom.

They are quite extraordinary aren’t they? If infact they are the real deal.

There is talk that there is suppose to be a few more pics but they apparently did not turn out to good.

On the other forums (name withheld) (as there is really only one good forum), suggests that that juvenile Sasquatch took on a stump like pose after hearing the first shot go off thus disguising itself, which explains the strange posture it took on in the third pic.

As Romeo and hillbilly pointed out It is a shame there was not any video.

It's a bear with mange.

goto cryptomundo for comparative photos or follow these links:

http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d129/ ... rbones.jpg


http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/mangy-bear


This is very clear example of how the BFRO has gone bye-bye.
If they were the “scientific” organization they say they are - they certainly wouldn’t be waving their flag on the mountaintop, stating facts on the behavior of juvenile sasquatch.

The camera setup worked.

It's just turned out to be "not a Sasquatch",
just another mangy black bear.

Still, as more of these cameras are deployed,
we may yet get to see one.

Folcrom.

It very well could be, but a mangy bear isn't the only possibilty.

Although after viewing cryptomundo's images, it seems likely.

As folcrom pointed out, the idea was right, just not the result.