De Loys Ape
- Dean Harrison
- AYR Webmaster
- Posts: 1445
- Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 11:20 am
- Position: Field Researcher
- Facebook Profile Page: https://www.facebook.com/Dean.Harrison.AYR
- Location: Australia Wide
- Contact:
De Loys Ape
Google it.
I think there is something wrong with the story and picture.
If anyone who can tell me what is right about it - let me know.
Do you believe it is real, or a 1920's fraud? I don't doubt the Animal is real, but is it an unknown Ape?
Lets investigate.
DMH
I think there is something wrong with the story and picture.
If anyone who can tell me what is right about it - let me know.
Do you believe it is real, or a 1920's fraud? I don't doubt the Animal is real, but is it an unknown Ape?
Lets investigate.
DMH
The closure of people's minds, understandings and boundaries are subject to either current environmental pressures brewed by ignorance or insecurities sculptured by pre-environmental education whereby they know no better - Dean Harrison
-
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 10:05 pm
- Location: scarborough QLD
- Contact:
-
- Gold Status - Frequent Poster
- Posts: 316
- Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 3:53 pm
- Position: Lurker
- Location: Gold coast
Hey steve I think Deans talking about a incident in 1920's over on the colombian boarder.
What ive noticed so far is on every website, but one and that one didnt meantion a gender, The report was that a female was shot and got away and in the photo it clearly looks like a male.
Pitty the picture wasnt clearer.
What ive noticed so far is on every website, but one and that one didnt meantion a gender, The report was that a female was shot and got away and in the photo it clearly looks like a male.
Pitty the picture wasnt clearer.
" The man who follows the crowd will usually get no further than the crowd. The man who walks alone is likely to find himself in places no one has ever been." - Unknown
- Buck
- Team Member
- Posts: 252
- Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 7:20 am
- Position: Yowie Hunter
- Location: QLD
I agree with mikka about the gender discrepency, there appears to be a male appendage. However, on some sites it reports to debunk the myth as a new world Spider monkey sitting on it's tail. I don't think it's a tail.
The best photo I've come across other than the one in a book I have at home is on this link.
http://www.occultopedia.com/d/de_loys_ape.htm
You can see that the thumb looks like it doesn't oppose. There is a pre-hensile big toe. It seems to be a large primate with huge nocturnal eyes, how it was active during the day and aggresive is beyond me.
I have no reason to believe it's a hoax because there doesn't seem to be a clear motive for doing so, other than gaining fame or notoriety for discovering a new species.
Great post Dean. I've often wondered what other people thought of this sad and unusual photo.
Cheers Buck
The best photo I've come across other than the one in a book I have at home is on this link.
http://www.occultopedia.com/d/de_loys_ape.htm
You can see that the thumb looks like it doesn't oppose. There is a pre-hensile big toe. It seems to be a large primate with huge nocturnal eyes, how it was active during the day and aggresive is beyond me.
I have no reason to believe it's a hoax because there doesn't seem to be a clear motive for doing so, other than gaining fame or notoriety for discovering a new species.
Great post Dean. I've often wondered what other people thought of this sad and unusual photo.
Cheers Buck
Descates- I think therefore I am
Ubuntu (African Proverb) - I am because you are.
Ubuntu (African Proverb) - I am because you are.
-
- Gold Status - Frequent Poster
- Posts: 316
- Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 3:53 pm
- Position: Lurker
- Location: Gold coast
Ive been debating the thumb myself for the last hour or so. Sometime you look at it looks like it oposes and other times it doesnt
As for the size its hard to tell as the crate could be of any size
I can think of one good reason to hoax this, They traveled half way round the world, Quite a few people died and they didnt find anything. Wouldnt be to good a chip on the ego would it and I wouldnt think they would get must in the way of sponsorship for the next trip if they didnt come up with something.
Not really convinced either way yet. It really is an intrasting picture

As for the size its hard to tell as the crate could be of any size

I can think of one good reason to hoax this, They traveled half way round the world, Quite a few people died and they didnt find anything. Wouldnt be to good a chip on the ego would it and I wouldnt think they would get must in the way of sponsorship for the next trip if they didnt come up with something.
Not really convinced either way yet. It really is an intrasting picture

" The man who follows the crowd will usually get no further than the crowd. The man who walks alone is likely to find himself in places no one has ever been." - Unknown
- Stainmaster
- Gold Status - Frequent Poster
- Posts: 253
- Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2005 1:31 pm
- Position: Paranormal and Cryptozoology Researcher
- Location: Kilmore,Victoria,Australia
I have seen this photo before i think in a copy of a magazine i used to get called the Unexplained, i am open minded about this one as the photo looks to be real and the ape? looks to good to be a fake in that period of time.
But if one was found back then surely another would have atleast been seen since.
Like our hairy friend well no one that i have talked to or i have never read of a Yowie body been found, but there is plenty of sightings, unlike this ape so you would think at least a sighting since would have been seen??
anyway got to be open minded dont we
But if one was found back then surely another would have atleast been seen since.
Like our hairy friend well no one that i have talked to or i have never read of a Yowie body been found, but there is plenty of sightings, unlike this ape so you would think at least a sighting since would have been seen??
anyway got to be open minded dont we
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 251
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 4:29 pm
- Location: Redland Bay, Queensland
- Contact:
I've read 2 seperate articles about De Loys Ape. One said it was a female. The other, a male. He shot it on a riverbank or something, if memory serves correctly.
I think Bigfoot is blurry, that's the problem. It's not the photographer's fault. Bigfoot is blurry. And that's extra scary to me, because there's a large, out-of-focus monster roaming the countryside. Run. He's fuzzy. Get outta here.
-
- Bronze Status
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 7:52 am
yeh i read a bit about this in a book i have at home...apparently(i think it was these guys) tried to bring back a skull but it got to rotton and smelly in the jungle so they had to discard it...the crate is a "standard fuel crate" I think they said which around 50 cm tall or a bit more...cant remember anything else.
Noone believed in gorillas you know,until someone found one...
-
- Posts: 302
- Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 4:21 pm
- Location: Melbourne
Its an interesting topic! Isn't its genitalia (if its a male! LOL) a little large for a monkey? Or is it just the way its proped up?
Venezualia around 1912 would have been reasonably unexplored, so I guess it would be possible for the remnants of a large monkey-type critter to be hanging on by a thread. (There was that recent discovery of a new monkey speices,after all).
Why didn't they skin it and tan it? Explorers where always returning with animal skins, if they believed it was an unknown animal at the time, I find it strange that they didn't do everything they could to get it back,catergarise and named!
I would like to think it was genuine, gut-feeling says fake!
Venezualia around 1912 would have been reasonably unexplored, so I guess it would be possible for the remnants of a large monkey-type critter to be hanging on by a thread. (There was that recent discovery of a new monkey speices,after all).
Why didn't they skin it and tan it? Explorers where always returning with animal skins, if they believed it was an unknown animal at the time, I find it strange that they didn't do everything they could to get it back,catergarise and named!
I would like to think it was genuine, gut-feeling says fake!

I'm not fat.....I'm just fluffy
- Steve Mason
- Bronze Status
- Posts: 65
- Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2005 4:20 pm
- Location: NSW
-
- New Member
- Posts: 30
- Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 6:11 am
- Location: Tasmania
- Contact:
- Dion
- Forum Moderator
- Posts: 2175
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 1:44 pm
- Position: Researcher
Well there are a few things that could be noted on the De Loys ape which I believe to be a hoax
Look at the photo and one can clearly note some of the features which are out of character, the head, hands and feet and genitalia are all standouts.
http://www.cryptozoology.com/gallery/ga ... 1108634777
They supposedly shot the female after the male was shot at and escaped into the forest. Note the lack of breasts for a female, the abnormally elongated clitoris, too long in my mind (No, I did not stutter either).
Also the hands and feet seem to be suited more for climbing trees than walking around upright. Especially the feet, how something can walk around on recurved feet has got me stumped.
Nearly a decade passed before the image was made public. Odd in its self don?t you think? Enough time to create a well drawn out picture of a spider monkey.
The tail is simply cut off or stuffed in the box!
A friend of de Loys, Note, A (Dr). George Montandon published the image claiming it was a type of South American ape he dubbed "Ameranthropoides loysi". What sort of doctor was he?
The head seems out of place as well for me, almost human like but tapered with. In fact the whole photo seems odd, a mad doctor?s creation in my mind.
The fact that there was only one photo seems strange, why photograph it once? Why not from different angles?
And then there?s the bones and skull that mysteriously disappeared over the years. All the evidence points too a hoax!

Look at the photo and one can clearly note some of the features which are out of character, the head, hands and feet and genitalia are all standouts.
http://www.cryptozoology.com/gallery/ga ... 1108634777
They supposedly shot the female after the male was shot at and escaped into the forest. Note the lack of breasts for a female, the abnormally elongated clitoris, too long in my mind (No, I did not stutter either).

Also the hands and feet seem to be suited more for climbing trees than walking around upright. Especially the feet, how something can walk around on recurved feet has got me stumped.
Nearly a decade passed before the image was made public. Odd in its self don?t you think? Enough time to create a well drawn out picture of a spider monkey.
The tail is simply cut off or stuffed in the box!
A friend of de Loys, Note, A (Dr). George Montandon published the image claiming it was a type of South American ape he dubbed "Ameranthropoides loysi". What sort of doctor was he?
The head seems out of place as well for me, almost human like but tapered with. In fact the whole photo seems odd, a mad doctor?s creation in my mind.

The fact that there was only one photo seems strange, why photograph it once? Why not from different angles?
And then there?s the bones and skull that mysteriously disappeared over the years. All the evidence points too a hoax!

“The day science begins to study non-physical phenomena, it will make more progress in one decade than in all the previous centuries of its existence.” - Nikola Tesla
User formally known as chewy
User formally known as chewy
- Dean Harrison
- AYR Webmaster
- Posts: 1445
- Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 11:20 am
- Position: Field Researcher
- Facebook Profile Page: https://www.facebook.com/Dean.Harrison.AYR
- Location: Australia Wide
- Contact:
In the report, Deloys Journal states that while camped on the river's edge, both the male and female came out screeching, waving branches and throwing 'dung' at them. This in my opinion is classic low level primate behaviour - vastly dieefernt to the higher interlect of a Hominid/BF. For years, due to the reported size of the creature, some researchers have sugested 'unknown himinid/BF', but the bahaviour aspect rules that out.
Also, there is no definitive size ratio in the photo, only an estimation by Deloy. If spider monkeys are known to be up to 4ft tall, who is to say that there can't be any exceptionally tall ones wondering around.
Thirdly, it's quite possible it 'was' sitting on it's tail or had the tail disguised.
The region is however well known for both the large and small BF type Hominids. Such a large and mysterious place.
DMH
Also, there is no definitive size ratio in the photo, only an estimation by Deloy. If spider monkeys are known to be up to 4ft tall, who is to say that there can't be any exceptionally tall ones wondering around.
Thirdly, it's quite possible it 'was' sitting on it's tail or had the tail disguised.
The region is however well known for both the large and small BF type Hominids. Such a large and mysterious place.
DMH
The closure of people's minds, understandings and boundaries are subject to either current environmental pressures brewed by ignorance or insecurities sculptured by pre-environmental education whereby they know no better - Dean Harrison
-
- Approved Member
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 3:44 pm
- Location: Perth
I'm probably late to the discussion, but here goes.
I think it's quite clear that Loy's Ape was in fact a member of the Atelidae, or spider monkey family. As regards it's traits:
* it clearly has a classic platyrrhine nose
* the reduced thumb, barely a nub, is another key trait of the atelids, with the hand being reduced to a hook-like curve to aid in brachiation.
* now, the "penis". This actually is the engorged clitoris of the female of any of the _Ateles_ members, which grows as large as the penis; the labia majora are also quite large.
What we have here is to all obvious clues a member of the _Atelidae_, most likely even in the same genus _Ateles_. At best we could hope for a new species - not impossible. A few years back, a fossil atelid was found in caves indicating an animal with a body mass about 20-30% greater than the extant forms - perfectly in range with the *supposed* size of Loy's creature.
Problem there is that all we have to go on is that single size value, and no corroborative evidence of the size of the specimen pictured.
The issue of the dental count is likewise anecdotal, and does not conform to all known platyrrhine tendencies (36 teeth for the majority, with a tendency towards an *increase*, not a decrease.)
V.
I think it's quite clear that Loy's Ape was in fact a member of the Atelidae, or spider monkey family. As regards it's traits:
* it clearly has a classic platyrrhine nose
* the reduced thumb, barely a nub, is another key trait of the atelids, with the hand being reduced to a hook-like curve to aid in brachiation.
* now, the "penis". This actually is the engorged clitoris of the female of any of the _Ateles_ members, which grows as large as the penis; the labia majora are also quite large.
What we have here is to all obvious clues a member of the _Atelidae_, most likely even in the same genus _Ateles_. At best we could hope for a new species - not impossible. A few years back, a fossil atelid was found in caves indicating an animal with a body mass about 20-30% greater than the extant forms - perfectly in range with the *supposed* size of Loy's creature.
Problem there is that all we have to go on is that single size value, and no corroborative evidence of the size of the specimen pictured.
The issue of the dental count is likewise anecdotal, and does not conform to all known platyrrhine tendencies (36 teeth for the majority, with a tendency towards an *increase*, not a decrease.)
V.
- Dean Harrison
- AYR Webmaster
- Posts: 1445
- Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 11:20 am
- Position: Field Researcher
- Facebook Profile Page: https://www.facebook.com/Dean.Harrison.AYR
- Location: Australia Wide
- Contact:
Very impressive observations, also a very impressive apendage if that's the case.
Keep contributing - good post!
DMH
Keep contributing - good post!
DMH
The closure of people's minds, understandings and boundaries are subject to either current environmental pressures brewed by ignorance or insecurities sculptured by pre-environmental education whereby they know no better - Dean Harrison
-
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 10:05 pm
- Location: scarborough QLD
- Contact:
- Tommi
- Bronze Status
- Posts: 96
- Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2005 10:21 pm
- Location: Australia
It is possible to manipulate a photo however the signs would be clearly visible, e.g.: hand drawn lines etc.
That's a very long torso, to me it looks like a Spider-monkey, however I want to believe it isn't
My Observations:
Hair on the left side (right side of the subject) below arm looks different to the rest of the body. IE: It could have longer hair on the back then the front?
Face has very contrasting tone, specially the checks which don't look like they are covered in hair but more like swollen skin.
The feet look like they belong to a tree dweller.
Why is the mouth open if a stick has been jammed under it? Also if you tried to prop yourself up like that I would imagine that you would have a tendancy to fall forwards, unless it has a stick inserted through its anus which runs all the way through to his skull?
Actually the whole of the lower Torso looks a little odd, picture removing the whole of the darkened lower area and then joining the light area to the hips, you would have a smaller ape like creature, which you could argue is a spider monkey?
My thoughts on the issue.
That's a very long torso, to me it looks like a Spider-monkey, however I want to believe it isn't

My Observations:
Hair on the left side (right side of the subject) below arm looks different to the rest of the body. IE: It could have longer hair on the back then the front?
Face has very contrasting tone, specially the checks which don't look like they are covered in hair but more like swollen skin.
The feet look like they belong to a tree dweller.
Why is the mouth open if a stick has been jammed under it? Also if you tried to prop yourself up like that I would imagine that you would have a tendancy to fall forwards, unless it has a stick inserted through its anus which runs all the way through to his skull?
Actually the whole of the lower Torso looks a little odd, picture removing the whole of the darkened lower area and then joining the light area to the hips, you would have a smaller ape like creature, which you could argue is a spider monkey?
My thoughts on the issue.
-
- Approved Member
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 3:44 pm
- Location: Perth
Not true. Humans have the longest penis to body size of the "Great apes", but the smallest testes to body size. IIRC gorillas have the shortest penises (a calculation done on King Kong meant he topped the scale at 8") and chimps have the largest testes.Tommi wrote:Apparently humans have the smallest penis to body size conparision. The smaller the monkey the bigger it is.
V.
- Tommi
- Bronze Status
- Posts: 96
- Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2005 10:21 pm
- Location: Australia
- Dean Harrison
- AYR Webmaster
- Posts: 1445
- Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 11:20 am
- Position: Field Researcher
- Facebook Profile Page: https://www.facebook.com/Dean.Harrison.AYR
- Location: Australia Wide
- Contact:
I can't tell from the photo if it's anything other than a large spider-monkey. Crates come in as many sizes as there are lengths of string and my cynical eyes can't see anything to indicate exceptional size. Those hands and feet definitely belong to a tree-swinger.
Deliberate deception or just plain amateurish photography? Who knows? Maybe it was an unremarkable incident and was forgotten for years until the photos of the trip were reviewed for publication. Everyone knows how the memory can play tricks.
Vic
Deliberate deception or just plain amateurish photography? Who knows? Maybe it was an unremarkable incident and was forgotten for years until the photos of the trip were reviewed for publication. Everyone knows how the memory can play tricks.
Vic
-
- Approved Member
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 3:44 pm
- Location: Perth
Which parts? Most of the material on the biology of Atelidae is from Walker's "Mammals of the World", volume 5. The stuff about the penis/testes I'd have to dig through my uni anthropology stuff - I'm pretty sure it was from there. Most of the stuff pertaining to Loy's specimen in general comes from Huevelmans.Dean Harrison wrote:Viashino,
Can you quote you sources?
DMH
I can be more specific, if needs be.
V.
- Dean Harrison
- AYR Webmaster
- Posts: 1445
- Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 11:20 am
- Position: Field Researcher
- Facebook Profile Page: https://www.facebook.com/Dean.Harrison.AYR
- Location: Australia Wide
- Contact: