Giant Print Find

[Dean Harrison]

Remarkable new find! Unfortunately, this man wasn't carrying quite enough plaster to cast them.

More than likely too large to be Human.....

DMH

[SAB 8]

SHAQ? maybe?

I just don`t feel comfortable jumping to conclusions on this one. There must be a rational scientific explanation

[AL Pitman]

I am not convinced on this one there is no visible dermal ridge it could be a HOAX !


MY FINAL DECISION IS MAYBE ............

[Dean Harrison]

Please don't be too quick to dismiss anything.

I have however, noticed two things.... 1st, the gait appears to be side to side, which resembles a more Human style of walk. Secondly, if you look closely, you will notice our informant is not wearing any shoes.

Hypothesis: Could it have been possible that he had previously walked that stretch of sand and not noticed that he was leaving his own prints until he returned? I'm not entirely sure. At this stage I will give him the benefit of the doubt and look more closely into the matter.

Speaking of large feet, here's an interesting article... http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?fi ... sec=nation

DMH

[Ella]

Where have you Australians been? This one is a no-brainer. That photo was taken right here in Texas of an ordinary cowboy going barefoot!

As it's widely known, everything grows bigger here in Texas.

Problem solved.

[Dean Harrison]

I suspect this includes your heads Ella, thus the 10 Gallon Hat....?

DMH

[Ella]

ROTFL, Dean! The big hats are to hide our bloated egos. Texas pride!

[Mike Williams]

.Joe Black was accused of faking a footprint from Queensland in 2009..I told him.."think big Joe..and for gods sake..dont put your foot in the photo next to the print this time".
Nice work Joe..!!

[Ella]

Speaking of footprints, I'd sure like an opinion from some of yall. Some years ago, I was hiking along the San Bernard River bank in south Texas, and I found a print that looked like a "Bigfoot"--only making an assumption here, you understand--had twisted its heel around in the sand before landing on its toes. Not a great big print, and maybe whoever made it was jumping and landed on the heel, twisting around.

At a conference in Conroe, Texas, Chester Moore sold me a track cast that looked exactly the same. I gave it to my grandson, so I don't have it except in memory.

Are Yowies known--if "known" is the right word--to land on a heel and twist the foot around like that?

A lifelong field researcher in Washington State informed me that my print was made by a subspecies of Bigfoot called "Sandfoot", known to hang out on sandy river banks and sand bars, LOL!

[deadpool]

I think its photoshopped for one reason: look at the middle toe - the shadowing cuts off too soon, like someone had used the clone stamp tool.

I could probably re-create that myself, on a beach. I'll do a test tomorrow & see how it turns out.

[RingMaster]

Hey DOC
Sorry but i don't think i can agree with you on that pic, being in such soft mud its hard to pick up any definite features, could be anything. I don't know how big they are (no measure reference) but i am guessing there from a four legged animal like a pig, deer or even a dog, or maybe even a large bird. But that's just my opinion and i wasn't there when you found them.

[scuba]

[quote="doctorscream"] I had previously reasoned that these prints were made while the bigfoot was invisible in a higher dimension, and therefore having somewhat less effective weight, since apparently gravity has less pull in the higher dimensions. quote]

Where do these facts come from?
I was unaware that scientists had entered a higher dimension and studied the effects on gravity!
I must be living with my head in the sand! (the sand right next to these prints)

[Jo Blose]

Great find, Dean! Reminds me of that footprint you and I are said to have created! It was a real bummer that neither you or I are flat footed, and instead have high arches! That damn yowie just didn't know how to place his foot where we wanted him to did he? And he insisted on using his polio affected foot! Good yowie help is so hard to find these days!

As per the topic, at first glimpse it's perplexing how the image was created, but photoshopping is certainly a prime suspect! Note the course texture of the sand in and around the foreground footprint as compared to sand in other areas of the shot. The guy's right foot also appears to be unusually sharp against the sand line and the right side of his body looks to have been ever so slightly blur tooled! If all legit, I would expect no blurring to the guy's shape, considering he is standing still and posing.

A true master of illusion would have gone the extra mile and created a massive undersole using fibrelglass or rubber latex, layed it down, stomped on it, and then had a way of lifting it up without harming the edges of the print, and casting it out of view of the camera for the shot. Photoshopping is so yesterday!

Scuba, scientists have been exploring other dimensions for the past decade. They recently made a feature documentary on it called, "Land of the Lost". That documentary will clear up many of your queries.

On a serious note. Doc, I appreciate what you're saying. If the bigfoot was just getting around using his/her etheric body, then weight distribution would be significantly less than if he/she were fully materialised. Around 1907, Dr. Duncan McDougall measured that at the moment of death, a human being suddenly loses 21 grams of weight - ie the spirit or etheric body departing. Unfortunately, those findings are not accepted as scientific fact as the experiments could not be successfully duplicated later. But let’s just say it’s accurate for arguments sake! For your average nine foot bigfoot, you might expect the weight to be a bit more, say double or even triple 21 grams, taking it up to around 65 grams. Enough to make those shallow impressions of yours, hey Doc?

What interests me, Doc, is what is the catalyst to bring the bigfoot from etheric to fully materialised form? If they are vested protectors of certain natural habitats, is it possible the catalyst is emotion? Afterall, emotion is the secret ingredient behind the magickal arts, creative visualization, and certainly in being rewarded through earnest prayer! For example, some lousy humans wander into a Bigfoot area and the bigfoot become so incensed and outraged, that the intense emotion galvanises their bodies into an increased state of solidarity? What’s your thoughts, Doc? Or do you think they have a greater control over the process, say like a Shaman might have?

[Ella]

Thanx for the photo, Doc! In the print I saw in the sand, the heel appeared to have been spinning somewhat more when whoever it was landed on it. Chester's track cast also had the same type of heel print. I have heard that the curve on the inside of the foot means the Bigfoot is female--from Chester himself, and other researchers I don't remember the names of.

As for all the other debate, it's just too deep (no pun intended) for me to comment on, but it's very interesting reading! I just can't grasp such concepts because they strain my senile brain, LOL! But I do firmly believe BF are psychic, as did EB (RIP).

So in addition to the "Sandfoot" subspecies, we now appear to have the "Mudfoot", LOL!

[RingMaster]

Ringmaster, This particular print was found in the middle of a field of full length bigfoot prints, that were likely all laid down at the same time. Although the toe shape does appear to be a bit peculiar, the other prints were more squared off at the toe than normal as well, and thus appeared to be the aquatic version of bigfoot, since those feet resembled fins. Conceivably, the print could have been a bipedal pet of some sort. Though bigfoot are rarely thought to have acquired pets. But I do know of a report where a large cougar was thought to be a pet, since it's footprints were often seen in the near proximity of a certain bigfoot in Southern Oregon.

Im not saying it was bigfoots PET, im saying it was another animal, not a bigfoot (no offense, only my opinion).
At a second look at your pic, even though there's no datum to work out the size of the prints, there is some grass in the photo which unless was a very broad leaf type of grass, it would suggest that the prints are well within the size of a pig or deer.
If there's more photo's it would be good if you could upload them all together to give us a better understanding of what you found.

A good piece of equipment to have in your investigation kit is a black and white datum ruler to place beside the object being photoed, so no mater what distance or angle the photo is taken from the the dimensions can be reliably and consistently worked out at a later date.

As for being inter dimensional
From what i have read and the doco's i have seen, quantum physicists believe in parallel universe's or dimensions but don't believe you can be in two dimensions at the same point of time, before you say there in a "HIGHER" dimension not the same dimension, you would be admitting there in another dimension not ours and therefore cant leave footprints in our dimension unless they enter it, under which they would be bound by the same laws of physic's of our dimension and not weigh 100grams or 10lbs or what ever.

[Ella]

Well, Ringmaster and others, even though I don't know what to think about this debate (mainly because i don't understand the concepts yall are discussing, LOL!), I'm real pleased to know there are researchers who believe that the BF (and I would assume the Yowie) are more than just plain, garden variety, ape-like primates!

In Australia, there seems to be a much more liberal attitude toward considering the possibility of the "paranormal". In the United States, unfortunately, the opposite seems true. The attitude in general in the BF community is one of zero tolerance toward any idea but that of a purely F&B animal. Those who dare to differ from this one and only one belief are greatly ridiculed.

In fact, in the USA, anybody who even believes that Bigfoot exists is greatly ridiculed!

So I'm really glad to see different beliefs expressed freely here at AYR.

[RingMaster]

Hi Ella,

I have just started reading an interesting book, its called "Time Travel in Einstein's Universe", also a good doco if you can get it is "An Elegant Universe", but be warned you will probably end up with more questions than answers like me lol.

Yeah i hope i dont come across as a ridiculing person, i am not here to belittle or argue with anyone, everyone has a right to an opinion, because with more opinions comes more questions and hopefuly more answers. But i love delving into scientific doco's and book's, especially the grey area's like parallel universe's (with quantum physics) or "Einsteins theory of relativity" which i can barely grasp lol, hell i am probably right out of my depth to even try and question these things, but if one never questions ideas or so called evidence, then you start to speculate to make sense of a situation, which i believe will most definitely lead you away from the truth.

I mean speculations shouldn't be taken or spoken of as facts or truths, they are merely a guess and nothing more, they need to be backed up with reason or a proven theory if one is to even consider them,

I will probably regret saying this but, myself i am undecided on the existence of these bipedal creatures. I know that something is happening, there are too many sightings and reported contacts to ignore, but what it is i don't know and nor do i pretend to know, i guess life is more interesting when you don't know the answer to everything lol, hence my life is extremely interesting ha ha ha.

Now i may be considered a skeptic, but i don't really care. I believe a little bit of skepticism is a good thing, it will keep me on the right track, and help prevent me from jumping to conclusions.

[Shazzoir]

Forget Bigfoot.... I'm pretty worried about meeting the cat that left these in his sandbox!



LOL
Shazz

[topender]

WHOA

Thats one big pussy................cat

[AL Pitman]

TAP , TAP , TAP , whiska's



MY FINAL DECISION IS MAYBE ............

[Shazzoir]

I'm just glad I don't have to empty its litter tray!

[AL Pitman]

This maybe left of centre but in comparison to the more Human like post at the start of the thread these don't seem so pristine and unspoilt , maybe , perhaps , nahh surely not ! .

I hope Mike checks these ,

MY FINAL DECISION IS MAYBE ...........

[Yowie88]

a real bummer that neither you or I are flat footed,

I am flat footed and to say goodbye to a career in Forces (was going to join either the Navy or Airforce) but
was told no by a medical nurse due to my feet. My arch is virtually not existent and I wear a size 12 so maybe
I could make a decent print lol.

[AL Pitman]

Law enforcment is screaming for people with those sort of credentials give it a go , still an honourable vocation ..



MY FINAL DECISION IS MAYBE .............

[RingMaster]

Ringmaster, Physicists don't tell us the truth regarding the higher dimensions, very often. Why? Because they do not want terrorist countries to get any sort of help and develop an interdimensional warrior or weapon. Bigfoot cannot be weaponized however, due to them having a higher moral standard than man.

This is how I see the higher dimensions. There appears to be overlap between the nearby higher dimensions with man's dimension. The first three dimensions are spatial dimensions that comprise man's dimension with a baseline zero fourth dimension. The higher dimensions beyond can all be described as the subdimensions of the fourth dimension, and are likely frequency based. They woud have a higher number designation but still be the fourth dimension. So two objects can have the same x,y,z location, but have a different frequency of vibration of certain free quanta energy loops which decide which subdimension of the fourth dimension the object is in. And thereby essentially occupy the same place at the same time. Parallel universes can also occupy the same location as another universe, but there is not likely any overlap between universes. So a bigfoot/yowie can be invisible in a nearby higher dimension and still lay down footprints in the mud in man's dimension. There appears to be an infinite number of higher dimensions, by the way. The physicists just haven't come clean on that particular sticking point either. We can verify this by viewing orbs as they gradually transition in solidity, to become fully invisible as they fly into tree branches, and then occupy the same space as those tree branches.

[/quote]

firts were prob getting way off topic for this thread lol
OK i think i get where your going, but i understand there to be 3 dimensions of space and the fourth dimension to be time, so you can occupy the same space by not moving, but it will always be at a different point in your time line, so not being in the same space time dimension.

free quanta energy loops

With this quote are you referring to the "Superstring Theory"(or M theory). With string they talk about higher dimension but they mean a universe with more spacial dimensions (no mention of higher frequency's), but not an infinite number as you suggested (an infinite number of universe's yes, dimensions no), with superstring theory there is a maximum of 11 dimensions, 10 spacial and 1 of time.

Sorry but i still disagree with you on this one, as you will prob still disagree with me lol.

[Ella]

Hey Ringmaster, nothing wrong with healthy skepticism! Don't know if you're familiar with the fine cryptid artist, Karl Rose, who creates astounding Bigfoot pictures, absolutely beautiful! Well, he's an adamant nonbeliever, though you'd never know that from his art. He's a frequent poster on cryptozoology.com. An open mind either way is the way to go.

[Rastus]

It was Alberts son (Einstein had no brother) Hans Einstein who was an hydraulics engineer who attended Berkeley. He died in 1973. Not quite sure how his specialty relates to the study of bigfoot and the decision to change the fourth dimension. Maybe a lot of water needs moving / directing in the fourth dimension??

Oh and do you still make and sell those bigfoot calling systems Doc?

[Jo Blose]

Doc,

Pardon my ignorance, but how does the space-time concept explain bigfoot, in particular, bigfoot invisibility? Secondly, why was the University of California at Berkeley honoured to be ground zero for Bigfoot studies and research? Thirdly, what became of this research?

I'm inquisitive, and I didn't raise this discussion!

[AL Pitman]

Dean ..

You have created a monster !

I Love it !


MY FINAL DECISION IS MAYBE ..............

[Ella]

You and me both, Al! If Dean ever gets tired of being a famous field researcher, he can get a new career in creating cryptid monsters for the movies. I don't understand one quarter of what the posters are talking about, but that's part of the mystery.

Maybe this entire thread could be presented on the "Lost Tapes" program on Animal Planet? Americans would greatly enjoy watching this new development as it unfolds.