Thanks Dion. A very straightforward and honest answer. Being a bit of a scientific type, I already believe firmly in the theory of evolution. Although it seems undeniable there is much we don't know about it in the natural historical sense (as we weren't there), and I don't doubt that there could be some force underlying our existence, that people otherwise refer to as God. I would be a little surprised if there wasn't something. Although I don't really look at it from any normal religious pov.
I have heard very good argument from people, that when you take into account certain HAR regions of our genome, the changes undergone from when we began to stand upright and eventually reflected in things like tool use, art, culture etc. are mind boggling. Giving some the view that we must have been genetically altered along the way, by something or someone. I have even heard Prof. Dawkins speculate on it as a possibility (though an unsupported one at the moment).
You seem to be saying that Yowies are part of some sort of spiritual/paranormal conspiracy? I agree with an earlier comment, there is much about Yowies that seems to fit a similar pattern as other paranormal subjects.
Thanks senseonfire. I was wondering more if there was something I could try to welcome and encourage them to a certain area of bushland. I will look into it further, though I'm not keen on the big cats idea. The yellow stripe up my back isn't either.
The subject of human perception is a fascinating one, even if little understood by science at this stage. Largely because science requires things to be reproducible via experiment etc., so it's long been in the "too hard basket". Hence anything veering from the accepted norm gets dismissed a little too easily. This is beginning to change though and it's good to have science philosophers like Chalmers (an Aussie) to remind scientists that no matter how well they can understand neurons and synapses, it doesn't begin to explain the thing that allows for subjective experience underneath it all (consciousness itself). I have looked into some paranormal/ new age claims closely at certain stages. Some of them deserve genuine study IMO. Sorry for waffling on.
Rusty, you make some good points and I can understand how you would come to your conclusions. Though (without wishing to bring up arguments already covered in this thread), it is far more than just the lack of things like conclusive photos that lead some people to the "not physical" explanation. In some ways this would be understandable, I know just how difficult it can be to get decent snaps of mundane creatures and even then, with today's technology giving so many possibilities, it would still need something physical to verify it. It is the lack of anything that we would normally expect from an extant biological creature. Including some sort of evolutionary history that could allow for this, which in the two more popular areas for claimed "hairy men" (Aus and USA), is also completely lacking.
Even your own research, which is no doubt amongst the best, would be seen (at this stage anyway) by many and probably most scientists as still ambiguous (though no doubt fascinating and full of possibilities). If they are real creatures, I think you will be right. Research will require a completely different way of thinking and a different approach.