SAS tackle Ormeau Yowie

Unread post by **dawn** » Mon Nov 14, 2005 7:31 am

I thought I'd point out that my son-in-law is a naval pilot.....and has a lot of friends in the SAS......and he refers to them as SAS too!

Moroseth, you would be in the military, would you? You seem to think you know more than the people who are!

I suggest you use both hands to type!

Mon Nov 14, 2005 1:27 pm

lol that guy sucks

Mon Nov 14, 2005 1:40 pm

Always based myself on honesty..... yet there will always be people trying to bring me down......

Why?

DMH

Unread post by **b_r_j** » Mon Nov 14, 2005 1:44 pm

Getting back on topic......

Is this yowie still a threat or was the operation a success and it now has a fear of humans?

I personally would like to hear more about this, it is very intriguing.

Buck - thank you for that information, it explains a lot

Mon Nov 14, 2005 2:08 pm

I'm sure the attacks are aimed at me rather than the topic itself.

In regard to the latter question from BRJ, I'm not making any further comment in regards to this one.

People may email me if information is required, but thanks for your kind words and support BRJ.

DMH

Unread post by **hipoo2** » Mon Nov 14, 2005 4:45 pm

i think my message had a point and didnt deserve to be cut. moroseth is an idiot

Mon Nov 14, 2005 6:21 pm

Sorry, that one was my fault.

DMH

Unread post by **shane323** » Mon Nov 14, 2005 7:09 pm

to everyone i'm sorry if i upset anyone in my repliesw to moroseth but i can't stand fools or those who have no grasp of the facts and shoot down everyone else because they are too lazy to read something. to dean keep up the good work and don't let the knockers get to you.

Mon Nov 14, 2005 7:27 pm

moro are you going to say somthing or has the cass got your tounge.
(i read he's message before that got deleted, and i fell he has a right to speak up for himself, no matter how much of a tool he is)

Unread post by **Steve Mason** » Mon Nov 14, 2005 7:52 pm

Can't make out the message from this clown and that was why his babble was deleted and shut down from what I can see. I still don't get what his point was? Kiddy c**p and name calling?

Mon Nov 14, 2005 8:05 pm

His confusion Steve, not yours. Obviously some people either don't know who the Australian SAS are or simply want to create a futile argument without substance for their own cause...

DMH

Unread post by **hipoo2** » Mon Nov 14, 2005 8:19 pm

Well now that that's sorted i'm sure we can have fun talking about yowies. But i don't think he should have been banned (as he said in the deleted post) maybe just a warning or something? I mean some of the stuff he said was kinda right just he got annoyed and started swearing and all but it's not like you guys cant handle some1 swearing at you.

Mon Nov 14, 2005 8:25 pm

mb you could just H givE him Ya wArning Lol hE X was an idiot though

Mon Nov 14, 2005 8:29 pm

why cant you expose them dean, it just seems really stupid that they would want to cover up somthing as little as this... really stupid

Mon Nov 14, 2005 8:42 pm

Expose a contact or witness that we liase with in a confidential situation of trust? Never....

Never would we consider such an act.

Doesn't matter who it is. Integrity and loyalty.....

DMH

Mon Nov 14, 2005 8:59 pm

good point, but it still doesnt make much sense i mean why actually bother to take out bits. and if bits havnt been taken out then this report is not much better then bogus

Unread post by **hipoo2** » Tue Nov 15, 2005 1:21 pm

I think that buck isn't really funny at all. I knew the guy personally and i don't see why playing a game has anything to do with anything at all, please explain how this is in the least bit funny or whatever it was meant to be.

Tue Nov 15, 2005 2:05 pm

I know Buck personally myself and know for fact that he's one of the funniest people I know, honest, great guy, terrific intellect and someone who I enjoy spending time with.

Being an avid researcher on all topics, I think his words and research spoke quite clearly....

DMH

Unread post by **Romeo** » Tue Nov 15, 2005 2:48 pm

I don't know Buck personally and I can still say that he's absolutely hilarious.

It's hard to find one of his posts that isn't funny.

And what he pulled before........Genius.

Funniest guy I've never met.

Unread post by **hipoo2** » Tue Nov 15, 2005 8:44 pm

well buck didnt seem to be trying to be funny in that post, anyway any chance of answering camper's question it has a good point.

Unread post by **Buck** » Tue Nov 15, 2005 10:58 pm

Hi Hipoo2

Your mates posts were going a bit nuts and as you can see this thread has been hi-jacked well off the topic. Even now as I reply we're not being true to the thread. I have nothing against gamers or youth...

There is a joke there.. albeit a very small one, a play on words and spelling. It's really not that clever at all.

I'm going to delete it now as the point was made. Back to the thread now.

Bits of reports are deleted for sensitivity or at the persons request. If you read reports regularly you'll notice some people give their names others ask that their areas and neighborhoods not be exposed to unwanted attention. Just because some of it is not there doesn't disprove the whole event.

We all know Jimmy Hoffa is dead despite the lack of a body. (I haven't checked this out... there is no body right?)

Most of the people on this board use nicknames or pseudonyms. Are people bogus for not revealing their names, addresses or other details? Anonymity and confidentiality is probably what keeps us posting.

Thanks to all who think I'm funny, I am taking medication for it and hope to be cured soon.

I went to this Zoo the other day and all it had was a dog. It was a Shitszu...

Hey! Medication's working!

Now if there's a person that is maintains a sense of humor through all the criticism and ridicule... it's Dean... (Who is also brave enough to use his own name)

Cheers Buck (Not my name, just renting)

Wed Nov 16, 2005 11:47 am

lol shitszu (kidding).
the fact that the names are not there isnt the the reason i question this report, the reason i question it is because i dont really know what happened. like were they actually on a mission, were they off duty, was this a favour, and many other things that i could name (it one letter R SASR wats so hard!). its just like the rights to work campain by labor, i'm not going to choose sides on the matter until i know wats in the full legeslation (and no i dont know how to spell!)

Wed Nov 16, 2005 11:50 am

(well)

Unread post by **Romeo** » Wed Nov 16, 2005 3:13 pm

You're lucky to be priveledged enough to be supplied with this information.

You read what is provided and make up your mind.

And if you can't figure out what's going on after that.........read it again.

Wed Nov 16, 2005 6:58 pm

ok ive read it five times (i only needed to read it once) and if this is exactley wat happened (and they were there "working") then this report then this report is bogus to me, but that is just my opinion it mighten be right, but thats the way i see it.

Wed Nov 16, 2005 7:04 pm

k stuff it i dont care...... if you cant see this report as bull s#$% then you are ... im really bad at this.... still holy c**p really i cant belive it!!