William Tyrell - Yowie?

[Dean Harrison]

Has anyone seen this?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=arHi33CP9i0&t=5s



DMH

[DaveR]

Saw it last night. Intriguing and disturbing. It will be interesting to see how seriously its taken. I suspect not at all.

[micathia]

The 2:20 image suggests two yowies wandering together during the daylight in their yard. I think very unlikely.

[Scarts]

Hmmm, who's more likely - a Yowie or those pair?

[micathia]

Two things are consistent with yowie/bigfoot abduction theory though.

1. deadly quiet, can't even hear birds;
2. spiderman suit, aka, bright colour.

[Simon M]

It's too horrible to think about the idea that this case could prove the Yowie's existence.

[sensesonfire]

The mere suggestion that a Yowie could possibly be involved in this sad case would never see the light of day. I know that all avenues of investigation need to be explored before alternative theories can be looked at. Governments and other authorities just refuse to acknowledge that these creatures exist although covertly I
I'm sure many know they are real. Whether or not it is the fear of ridicule I don't know although I think it is to do more with the fact of no scientific proof.

Yowies appear to becoming more brazen venturing onto properties especially those situated on the periphery of bushland suburbs. These creatures in my opinion have malevolent intentions unlike that TV show Finding Bigfoot which suggests time and time again they are harmless. There are many reports of children being watched intently by bigfoots and it is very fortunate there hasn't been a child abduction...... or maybe there has. It could very be the case for Yowies. It really is not safe trekking out into the bush on your own - go in groups. I just don't know what it will take before authorities in power acknowledge these creatures existence, possibly a catastrophe, and I hope in little William Tyrell's abduction this is not the case.

[Yowie bait]

I doubt very much he was taken by a yowie. If one of us posted our own evidence as fuzzy as that, i think it would be ruled out as inconclusive at best. Just my opinion of course.

Like Seasonfire says, they seem to be getting more brazen in public areas. If we keep encroaching on their areas then sightings will become more common.

[paulmcleod67]

My own work on this theory ,indicates that at least something untoward is going on.

There is a logic to the idea that Yowies are getting braver in approaching populated areas.

1) Since colonial days we have moved away from subsistence farming and into "shopping malls".
this would include a portion of the aboriginal traditional land owners.

2) With migration resource pressures lessened , yowie populations could, in theory, increase.

3) The continued development of former pastoral land by developers is pushing the urban sprawl ever inland, which might account
for so many reports over the last twenty years.

I'm certain there are many other unknown ecological factors that could be contributing factors.

Cheers

Paul

[Scarts]

Who is Katherine B, and why did she look on Google Earth at William Tyrell's place of disappearance, for Bigfoot, in the first place? There seems to be no supportive reason for doing so. At no time has his mother or grandmother or anyone else mentioned any sightings or any strange activity around the property. The creator of this video has a few questions to answer......

[paulmcleod67]

Who is Katherine B, and why did she look on Google Earth at William Tyrell's place of disappearance, for Bigfoot, in the first place? There seems to be no supportive reason for doing so. At no time has his mother or grandmother or anyone else mentioned any sightings or any strange activity around the property. The creator of this video has a few questions to answer......

Start asking the questions then, because GLOBAL MONSTER is one of my YouTube channels.

As for why?

Look through the forum. I started investigating the Tyrell case as part of my missing persons investigation.

Happy to answer whatever you like, however I request that you read the entire investigation first so as minimise digression.

Cheers

[Scarts]

Where can I read the entire investigation you're referring to, Paul?

[paulmcleod67]

I think its based upon the video I recently posted on the matter?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oyLhLkPBTsc

There seems to enough data to at least give the matter consideration.

Cheers

[paulmcleod67]

Where can I read the entire investigation you're referring to, Paul?

Here you go


viewtopic.php?f=45&t=5395


Cheers matey

[Rastus]

I think some of you are barking up the wrong tree with this line of thought. What is more likely ?

1: A Yowie(s) took him, or
2: Known paedophiles who had some form of association with the family and contact with said family in the timeframe that William disappeared and are the subject of Police investigation and surveillance?

I know who my money is placed on.

[Scarts]

Discernment is important, as is care in passing comments on ongoing investigations such as this.

Who can condone the inference a Yowie might be involved because there was a single Yowie sighting near the area, four years previously? The sighting of a Yowie in an area automatically making that area a Yowie area, is an assumption.

If grandma had been having ongoing problems with a prowler, that would be a different story. She hasn't mentioned anything of the sort. It's too long a bow to draw, and the google earth interpretation could be someone working in the garden on that date or pure paradolia of unknown dark shapes in the images.

[micathia]

Hi

in this case, any report on search dogs?

is the house fenceless? it looks like in the video. if so, how were those search gods performing？

[ChrisV]

I'll throw my opinion in on this...for what it is worth.
I watched the video and I agree - there is only one picture that the presenter shows that shows any real resemblance of an unknown figure which could literally be anything. Not enough in my mind to post such a video and claim its a Yowie.

Its a stretch and a half....although the poster seems very confident that a Yowie is pictured in more than one picture. Not enough to go on on those simple images.

[paulmcleod67]

Hi

in this case, any report on search dogs?

is the house fenceless? it looks like in the video. if so, how were those search gods performing？

Tracking dogs including those trained for cadaver search, failed to pick up (or refused to track) Williams scent....at all.

No boundary fences.

Cheers

[paulmcleod67]

Discernment is important, as is care in passing comments on ongoing investigations such as this.

Who can condone the inference a Yowie might be involved because there was a single Yowie sighting near the area, four years previously? The sighting of a Yowie in an area automatically making that area a Yowie area, is an assumption.

If grandma had been having ongoing problems with a prowler, that would be a different story. She hasn't mentioned anything of the sort. It's too long a bow to draw, and the google earth interpretation could be someone working in the garden on that date or pure paradolia of unknown dark shapes in the images.

There have been far more Yowie sightings in the district and surrounds than just ONE. (see image below)
Research is the key to all this and not just vague generalisations or sniping at theories YOU don't like. (no offense meant).

As for ongoing investigations? They are going nowhere because there IS no hard evidence. Even the car sightings is refuted by the step mother during her original 000 call (check for yourself).

And if you watch my video...the full version...all you other points have been well considered prior to my publication of it.

Ill also post the precursor notice I put as an introduction just to clear up any inference of impropriety or poor taste.

I've been a professional researcher and published author for many years, I don't jump to conclusions, I follow the line of evidence.

Cheers matey

[paulmcleod67]

Missed the operators questions....sorry

[paulmcleod67]

I think some of you are barking up the wrong tree with this line of thought. What is more likely ?

1: A Yowie(s) took him, or
2: Known paedophiles who had some form of association with the family and contact with said family in the timeframe that William disappeared and are the subject of Police investigation and surveillance?

I know who my money is placed on.

Well its 2017 and William went missing in 2014?

I think you may have lost your money, the police have nothing solid. I know, I rang and asked. All I get is the old "We are following many leads" c**p.

They have nothing but phantom cars, and local pedo,s which unfortunately and pathetic as it is (if you read the reports) most suburbs have.

[paulmcleod67]

I'll throw my opinion in on this...for what it is worth.
I watched the video and I agree - there is only one picture that the presenter shows that shows any real resemblance of an unknown figure which could literally be anything. Not enough in my mind to post such a video and claim its a Yowie.

Its a stretch and a half....although the poster seems very confident that a Yowie is pictured in more than one picture. Not enough to go on on those simple images.

I did a fair bit of work on this prior to this lady coming to the same conclusions...independently, if not in very much detail.

And its fair to say my image enhancement skills are a touch better, try four images of the figure in the garden. Google earth run multiple camera angles and multiple camera's (again research is the key and not generalisation).

[Dion]

Firstly the whole story is disturbing enough and I would hate to think of what the family has been through, I know nothing about the case and dont have much to say other than, to suggest a Yowie has walked onto some property and taken the child in broad daylight is a nuttier theory than the person who took him. Sad case indeed.

[paulmcleod67]

Firstly the whole story is disturbing enough and I would hate to think of what the family has been through, I know nothing about the case and dont have much to say other than, to suggest a Yowie has walked onto some property and taken the child in broad daylight is a nuttier theory than the person who took him. Sad case indeed.

Nothing upsets me more than this case matey.

I'm no nutter. period.

I suggest you look into the Denis martin case in the US. There are hundreds of this type of disappearance just in Australia.

Facts are facts.

[paulmcleod67]

I'll throw my opinion in on this...for what it is worth.
I watched the video and I agree - there is only one picture that the presenter shows that shows any real resemblance of an unknown figure which could literally be anything. Not enough in my mind to post such a video and claim its a Yowie.

Its a stretch and a half....although the poster seems very confident that a Yowie is pictured in more than one picture. Not enough to go on on those simple images.

Chris, try this link to my video (which I believe she based her assertions on).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oyLhLkPBTsc

I put as much information in it as time edits would allow (it goes for around an hour).

Cheers

[Simon M]

I'm in no doubt that your enhanced images show a large, dark, human-like figure. I'm no expert nor am I a trained observer, but that's what I'd say it looks like.

I haven't done any research and don't know much about the case, so I wouldn't feel confident in asserting anything beyond that - it looks like a human-type figure in the images. It's impossible to infer anything from the images themselves, though.

If there's info that hasn't been released to the public - or even the family - then we'll never know. If the Police suspected anything too weird had gone on, they'd no doubt feel obliged not to say so out of respect for the family. They're certainly not going to start talking about Yowies and the like, even if they cannot actually explain what occurred. They probably feel badly enough about not finding him to start discussing what most people would think of as wild ideas. That's one of the innate problems with this whole line of enquiry - 95% of the population will immediately stop listening the moment they hear the word 'Yowie'.

My opinion is that this will remain unsolved until the young lad shows up (hopefully alive) at some future date. The Police literally have nothing to go on, but it seems almost impossible to think that someone could've taken him without being observed or heard. Either he knew his abductor(s) and wasn't afraid to leave with them, or/and whoever took him was an expert in remaining unseen and moving through rugged terrain, and was also strong enough to carry away a small child without being seen or heard by anyone nearby.

[ChrisV]

I'll throw my opinion in on this...for what it is worth.
I watched the video and I agree - there is only one picture that the presenter shows that shows any real resemblance of an unknown figure which could literally be anything. Not enough in my mind to post such a video and claim its a Yowie.

Its a stretch and a half....although the poster seems very confident that a Yowie is pictured in more than one picture. Not enough to go on on those simple images.

Chris, try this link to my video (which I believe she based her assertions on).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oyLhLkPBTsc

I put as much information in it as time edits would allow (it goes for around an hour).

Cheers

Thanks Paul....what do you think the authorities would say if you approached them with this research ( not sure if you have already ).

[paulmcleod67]

I'll throw my opinion in on this...for what it is worth.
I watched the video and I agree - there is only one picture that the presenter shows that shows any real resemblance of an unknown figure which could literally be anything. Not enough in my mind to post such a video and claim its a Yowie.

Its a stretch and a half....although the poster seems very confident that a Yowie is pictured in more than one picture. Not enough to go on on those simple images.

Chris, try this link to my video (which I believe she based her assertions on).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oyLhLkPBTsc

I put as much information in it as time edits would allow (it goes for around an hour).

Cheers

Thanks Paul....what do you think the authorities would say if you approached them with this research ( not sure if you have already ).

Hi mate.

Yeah I do intend on approaching the authorities, after I go to Kendall and do some local investigation and try and get a few statements from the locals.

I was kind of hoping the police investigators would approach me after I released the video, but I suppose the theory is just too haoky for them , which is fair enough given the authoritarian view on the Yowie.

We are all working to change that in our own way I suppose.

[ChrisV]

Understandable Paul.
Its a big stretch if your not open minded about these things...

The truth will come out one way or another.

It will be like the search for MH370. No real evidence for 3 years but hopefully the ocean will give up her secrets.