Tuckeroo wrote: Thu Mar 29, 2018 10:33 am
Hi ITD,
You said you have only found one video so far that has defied your attempts to debunk it.
I was wondering what that one is and your reasons. I can’t see that you mentioned it anywhere.
I see you asked for five vids that other people would consider to be authentic. I don’t think many are ever 100 % for me
but there are a few that make you wonder.
One is Marble mountain, where some school teachers and young male students are on a camping trip and discover a humpy
of twigs and branches. Then the teacher draws everyone’s attention to a figure walking on a far ridge line.
This vid has been pulled to pieces by the sceptics to be fake, me included, but the overwhelming thing for me is how big
that figure is in the distance. It defies your normal perspective through the eye to the horizon.
Although the figure is human shape and is stepping across the stones like a human would, it seems so far away it must be
about 8 ft tall. The arms look very long also.
When you see the reaction of the students and teachers it really seems like they all know it’s a set up prank for their
camping trip, but why does that figure in the distance look so tall ?
Another thing is the humpy, although easy to build, has long large branches cleanly snapped. Makes you wonder.
Another one that I was interested in was the Paul Freeman video. It clearly shows a large figure moving right to left
about 12-15 metres away from the camera. The camera is not jumping around, the vision is clear of a gorilla looking figure.
Mr Freeman is puffing a bit from the pursuit and excitedly says ‘Oh there he goes………Jesus’. There is even some footprints.
Of course there’s the P and G footage that I see you have avoided, for good reason.
There is also the bigfoot Independence day video by BF evidence. It is the most clearest and closest vid you will see
but then again only a glimpse and only the top half of the body. It's carrying a child which is incredible.
Why would someone go to the trouble of getting a hairy suit for their 3 year old, it looks real enough.
There are some vids from Yellowstone NP. which show figures in the snow that look convincing. Come to think of it many of
the ones I’ve seen where there’s snow are the best.
I guess the snow is a blank background that lets the figure stand out. Especially if it moves at great speed.
Also snow would be pretty hard to walk in wearing a hairy suite and snow has the best footprints.
An example of this is the vid that Shazzior has linked in the previous post, I forgot about that one, I saw it awhile back.
You can see how tall the figure is and how fast it moves, as S said ‘ large stride length’, in the snow, easily seen.
When you say you analyse the vids with a clinical and scientific eye I wonder if your analysis is based on a technical criteria
you have read about or are trained in or your own gut instinct. For me it’s instinct first then the visual analysis.
Your post got me thinking about what is my own ‘personal criteria for authenticity’.
Well for starters, any vid that is blurry or pixelated or moves around too much........forget it.
This would dismiss 90% of the vids I’ve seen on the net. Also anything where there is fur/hair
in amongst twigs and branches just doesn’t do it for me.
A lot of vids cut out right when your about to see something but I guess this could also be out of fear of suddenly realizing
what their looking at through the view finder.
Many videos show hair on the figure that always looks the same, like a pelt which is in contrast to many reports
of these creatures having wild unkempt hair, matted long and putrid.
Other things that come to mind are how are any people present reacting to what is there and how has the vid been edited.
In the vid with the Russian teens and the footprint followers their reactions to what their seeing just doesn’t seem right,
but then again that figure does move quickly.
cheers,
T.
