Friendly Encounter

[JohnnyAnonymous]

Why we don't post our photos and other collected evidence, there is a level of intelligence with our Forrest friends that is beyond our own, they know when they have been portrayed or given up, they know if you mean them harm or you seek friendship, there is no hiding anything from them, we don't share our evidence as we will not risk our friendship with them, Climber

Apologies as I'm about to show my global ignorance here....

But can you explain what the difference is (if indeed there is no hiding anything from them), wouldn't the fact that your here on this forum and speaking about them in itself a form of "giving them up" by sharing your experiences with them to us? Wouldn't they know that you've talked about them to us?

I'm just asking.. because I certainly don't know and am just trying to soak up as much knowledge as I can. Just trying to understand so thanks in advance.

Johnny

[Climber]

Why we don't post our photos and other collected evidence, there is a level of intelligence with our Forrest friends that is beyond our own, they know when they have been portrayed or given up, they know if you mean them harm or you seek friendship, there is no hiding anything from them, we don't share our evidence as we will not risk our friendship with them, Climber

Apologies as I'm about to show my global ignorance here....

But can you explain what the difference is (if indeed there is no hiding anything from them), wouldn't the fact that your here on this forum and speaking about them in itself a form of "giving them up" by sharing your experiences with them to us? Wouldn't they know that you've talked about them to us?

I'm just asking.. because I certainly don't know and am just trying to soak up as much knowledge as I can. Just trying to understand so thanks in advance.

Johnny

I haven't shared anything of worth.

[Climber]

Why we don't post our photos and other collected evidence, there is a level of intelligence with our Forrest friends that is beyond our own, they know when they have been portrayed or given up, they know if you mean them harm or you seek friendship, there is no hiding anything from them, we don't share our evidence as we will not risk our friendship with them, Climber

Apologies as I'm about to show my global ignorance here....

But can you explain what the difference is (if indeed there is no hiding anything from them), wouldn't the fact that your here on this forum and speaking about them in itself a form of "giving them up" by sharing your experiences with them to us? Wouldn't they know that you've talked about them to us?

I'm just asking.. because I certainly don't know and am just trying to soak up as much knowledge as I can. Just trying to understand so thanks in advance.

Johnny

I haven't shared anything of worth.

When I say of worth I mean worthy of betrayal.

[Mad Academic]

Would you be willing to post a photo here on this website?
It would not reveal your location.
Or are they unclear photos ("Blobsquatches" as they are known in the USA).
[/quote]
We have a great deal of quality material that we have collected over the years, I am not here to prove anything, we are only here for research and we would never portray them in this manner so as to relieve the mind of the unbeliever or troll, I am not saying you are either but you don't know what you request, Climber
[/quote]

My request was nothing more or less than what it seemed: a simple request.
But it got the response I was expecting.
Fairly typical disparaging reply; first insult, then offer an offhanded qualification "I am not saying you are either..."

[Boab Bob]

Interesting.

I've had small green unopened pine cones thrown at me. They did not come straight towards me but were thrown up over the canopy in a big arc and landing right next to me. Never saw the thrower.

I've been bing watching Dean's videos on YouTube (A.Y.R.). Dean has become expert at interviewing/questioning so the videos are usually very comprehensive in description of appearance and behavior.

After watching *many* AYR vids I am left with an impression of aggressiveness. I think the Yowie is more aggressive than BF. There are several reports of physical contact including Dean's own primary encounter.

Be careful out there.

FYI i think most of the interviews are done by Paul Cropper some of the recent ones by Gary Opit.

[yowiedan]

Interesting.

I've had small green unopened pine cones thrown at me. They did not come straight towards me but were thrown up over the canopy in a big arc and landing right next to me. Never saw the thrower.

I've been bing watching Dean's videos on YouTube (A.Y.R.). Dean has become expert at interviewing/questioning so the videos are usually very comprehensive in description of appearance and behavior.

After watching *many* AYR vids I am left with an impression of aggressiveness. I think the Yowie is more aggressive than BF. There are several reports of physical contact including Dean's own primary encounter.

Be careful out there.

FYI i think most of the interviews are done by Paul Cropper some of the recent ones by Gary Opit.

Doesn't Dean Harrison do the newer Audio witness report interviews.

[Climber]

Would you be willing to post a photo here on this website?
It would not reveal your location.
Or are they unclear photos ("Blobsquatches" as they are known in the USA).

We have a great deal of quality material that we have collected over the years, I am not here to prove anything, we are only here for research and we would never portray them in this manner so as to relieve the mind of the unbeliever or troll, I am not saying you are either but you don't know what you request, Climber
[/quote]

My request was nothing more or less than what it seemed: a simple request.
But it got the response I was expecting.
Fairly typical disparaging reply; first insult, then offer an offhanded qualification "I am not saying you are either..."
[/quote]

I am sorry you took offence Mad Academic, you don't know what you ask and because your knowledge is limited I didn't want to offend you, when you do have a greater understanding you will agree with my statements, again I mean no offence but you are not our priority, THAY ARE, WE WILL DO NOTHING ON THIS FORUM TO RISK OUR RELATIONSHIP WITH THEM, Climber

[Climber]

I am truly sorry if my comments on here have offended anyone it is not our intent, it is clear that our experiences with our forest friends differ greatly from others, never have we had an aggressive encounter and this is why we question most of the material on this thread, I know everybody is different and so to our experiences but surely there must be more people out there who are having friendly experiences ???
To the doubters, if you don't mind, please refrain from posting as we are only looking for like minded researchers and we don't want to waste your time or ours in useless banter, Climber

[Searcher]

G’day Climber,

Thanks for posting your interesting story of Yowie encounters. However, I need some enlightenment. Your opening post on page 1 read:

the one visual we have had was at sunrise and as soon as we spotted it it ran away from us up the hill behind our campsite at an amazing pace.

On page 2 of this thread in a reply to Mad Academic it was said:

We have a great deal of quality material that we have collected over the years

And in a page 3 reply to Johnny Anonymous:

Yes at the beginning we took photos, casts and recordings

First it is claimed to have only one visual sighting and then you are saying you have multiple photographic evidence. The above statements are clearly in conflict, so I was simply wondering which one is correct.

[Climber]

G’day Climber,

Thanks for posting your interesting story of Yowie encounters. However, I need some enlightenment. Your opening post on page 1 read:

the one visual we have had was at sunrise and as soon as we spotted it it ran away from us up the hill behind our campsite at an amazing pace.

On page 2 of this thread in a reply to Mad Academic it was said:

We have a great deal of quality material that we have collected over the years

And in a page 3 reply to Johnny Anonymous:

Yes at the beginning we took photos, casts and recordings

First it is claimed to have only one visual sighting and then you are saying you have multiple photographic evidence. The above statements are clearly in conflict, so I was simply wondering which one is correct.

PLEASE READ AGAIN AND TURN ON YOUR INTELLIGENCE-There is NO - I REPEAT - NO, CONFLICTING EVIDENCE AS AT NO STAGE DID I SAY I HAVE MULTIPLE PHOTOS OF THE SAID SUBJECT, sorry you can't read legible ENGLISH, your interpretation has been twisted to suit your needs, I apologize that you doubt our experiences that is your prerogative no matter how misleading your insight, friend don't comment on a subject you know nothing of.

[Climber]

G’day Climber,

Thanks for posting your interesting story of Yowie encounters. However, I need some enlightenment. Your opening post on page 1 read:

the one visual we have had was at sunrise and as soon as we spotted it it ran away from us up the hill behind our campsite at an amazing pace.

On page 2 of this thread in a reply to Mad Academic it was said:

We have a great deal of quality material that we have collected over the years

And in a page 3 reply to Johnny Anonymous:

Yes at the beginning we took photos, casts and recordings

First it is claimed to have only one visual sighting and then you are saying you have multiple photographic evidence. The above statements are clearly in conflict, so I was simply wondering which one is correct.

There has been alot said purposely to mislead because of the way things are twisted and used on this forum, OUR EXPERIENCES AND MY FAMILY DO NOT BELONG ON THIS FORUM.

[Bluedog]

G’day Climber,

Thanks for posting your interesting story of Yowie encounters. However, I need some enlightenment. Your opening post on page 1 read:

the one visual we have had was at sunrise and as soon as we spotted it it ran away from us up the hill behind our campsite at an amazing pace.

On page 2 of this thread in a reply to Mad Academic it was said:

We have a great deal of quality material that we have collected over the years

And in a page 3 reply to Johnny Anonymous:

Yes at the beginning we took photos, casts and recordings

So as I understand it, your saying we can't believe anything you've said thus far on the forum??????

First it is claimed to have only one visual sighting and then you are saying you have multiple photographic evidence. The above statements are clearly in conflict, so I was simply wondering which one is correct.

There has been alot said purposely to mislead because of the way things are twisted and used on this forum, OUR EXPERIENCES AND MY FAMILY DO NOT BELONG ON THIS FORUM.

[Bluedog]

[
[/quote]
There has been alot said purposely to mislead because of the way things are twisted and used on this forum, OUR EXPERIENCES AND MY FAMILY DO NOT BELONG ON THIS FORUM.
[/quote]

That's a cop out climber, blaming us for your bull !!!
You chose to join this forum, you can choose to leave!

[Climber]

[

There has been alot said purposely to mislead because of the way things are twisted and used on this forum, OUR EXPERIENCES AND MY FAMILY DO NOT BELONG ON THIS FORUM.
[/quote]

That's a cop out climber, blaming us for your bull !!!
You chose to join this forum, you can choose to leave!
[/quote]

NO -- its a realization, there is none so blind as those who will not see.

[Searcher]

Hey Climber,

Better climb down from your high horse. I was hoping for an explanation, not a rant full of capital letters!

An English lesson for you. You clearly wrote “we took photos”. Photos spelt with an ‘s. Plural…meaning more than one photo. Could that possibly mean multiple? And you also wrote on December 6 of this year "the one visual we have had". Makes no sense. Perhaps you are making all this up as you go.

It seems you want to blame this forum and the many good members who post here for any inconsistencies in your story. Perhaps that’s all it is... just a story. Something I and many others could easily fabricate and write. You have not offered a shred of supporting evidence due to your rationalisation of "what’s good for them”. Now isn’t that so very convenient!

I'm joining Bluedog and calling you out.

[thehairyone]

Hi All , cant we all just get along , yes Climber said "he has photoS " but nowhere does he say photoS of our hairy friends , could be photos
of tree breaks , footprints suspected bedding , absolutely anything , I personally have thousands of pics but only a few of the big guys / girls , and no I am not posting them for my own reasons , but there is no need to go on the attack , truthfully a bit of support or advise to Climber would be more benficial to all on this forum
Cheers Greg

[Searcher]

Hi Greg,

I totally get what you are saying. However, please consider the following:

Towards the bottom of this thread on page 2 JohnnyAnonymous. asked “Have you ever tried to photograph them?” ‘Them’ meaning the Yowies. Climber’s immediate reply was “Yes at the beginning we took photos, casts and recordings “

Now what does that sound like to you? Clear as day to me there are conflicting details in his story. Read page 1 where he says: “the one visual we have had”.

I don’t believe we will never see any of this photographic evidence because it simply doesn’t exist! So please don't hold your breath hanging out for it.

Let’s not forget hoaxers sometimes get on this forum. Paul McLeod borrowed the trust of many people here for quite a few months and then let them down big time. Why did we fall for this trickster? It was because we were too ‘nice’ to take him to task on various inconsistencies. He turned out to be a complete fraud and those who supported him and gave credibility to his stories were made to look foolish.

This is all my opinion, but Climber displays quite a few of McLeod’s traits. Writing style, manner of expression, short temper, shouts in capital letters when angry, often brings wife or girl friend into conversation for support purposes, comments only on his own thread and says his name at the end of his post… just like McLeod. The retired soldier thing and similar age in his profile are other pointers.

Could this be McLeod masquerading as Climber to continue his hoaxing charade?? ...Time will tell.

It's New Year's Eve and I'm looking forward to the fireworks!

[thehairyone]

Hi Searcher
Totally understand what you are saying , and now that you mention the " McLeod " connection it does make you wonder , he has used a second name in the past ( after the fan was hit ), could this be a third coming ????
Cheers Greg

[Bluedog]

Yes Climbers credibility must be questioned, searchers questions are more than reasonable.
His statement that alot of what he has posted is purposely meant to mislead (deceive) brings his credibility in to account.
Climbers earlier post where he states only 10% of posts on this forum are worth absorbing (does this apply to Climbers posts?)
I think I smell a rat!

[adventurer]

Hi, i dont think theres a connection with Climber or Paul, Pauls always wanted evidence and would never talk about the hairees in such manner, example: their friendly, level of intelligence with our Forrest friends, there is no hiding from them. I dont think Paul has ever discussed Yowies like this and sure he wouldnt believe in that side of them.
Also about posting pics, a lot of people dont ( it does sound like Climber wants to protect them), even Thehairyone said he wouldnt post pics for certain reasons ( and no ones jumping on him for that). Paul likes posting pics.
I myself sometimes end my posts with Dee. Also sometimes i get confused with what happened on certain outings or dates, which is why i keep records. God help me if i posted something i simply forgot the exact night say. It doesnt mean everyones a hoax, just lots happen. Anyhow i hope all is good.

[thehairyone]

Hi Dee , I also always end my posts
Cheers Greg

Cheers Greg

[Austral]

Dee has said what I was thinking. I’ve seen two or three people leave this forum because they wouldn’t comply to various requests which I was quite interested in there findings. This “friendly encounter” was one of the more valuable ones so let’s cool down and get on with it. Don’t go please Climber, but I recon we do need something from you.

[Bluedog]

I think we need something from Climber to substantiate his claims.
Maybe he could share a photograph of a footprint or tree structure, maybe attach a audio file.
If he has some evidence to show us it would lend some credibility to his encounters.
The claims that he does not want to share any evidence for fear of upsetting his relationship with his forest friends is quite convenient and I think a bit of a cop out.
Also the fact in quite a few posts Climber has been quite patronising when asked relevant questions regarding his claims.
Here's hoping Climber responds and presents us with something otherwise its all a bit suspect to me!

[gregvalentine]

I think we need something from Climber to substantiate his claims.
Maybe he could share a photograph of a footprint or tree structure, maybe attach a audio file.
If he has some evidence to show us it would lend some credibility to his encounters.
The claims that he does not want to share any evidence for fear of upsetting his relationship with his forest friends is quite convenient and I think a bit of a cop out.
Also the fact in quite a few posts Climber has been quite patronising when asked relevant questions regarding his claims.
Here's hoping Climber responds and presents us with something otherwise its all a bit suspect to me!

[sarcasm]I can only assume that his forest friends must have internet access and so regularly visit the AYR forum . . .[/sarcasm]

[Mad Academic]

Hey Climber,

Better climb down from your high horse. I was hoping for an explanation, not a rant full of capital letters!

An English lesson for you. You clearly wrote “we took photos”. Photos spelt with an ‘s. Plural…meaning more than one photo. Could that possibly mean multiple? And you also wrote on December 6 of this year "the one visual we have had". Makes no sense. Perhaps you are making all this up as you go.

It seems you want to blame this forum and the many good members who post here for any inconsistencies in your story. Perhaps that’s all it is... just a story. Something I and many others could easily fabricate and write. You have not offered a shred of supporting evidence due to your rationalisation of "what’s good for them”. Now isn’t that so very convenient!

I'm joining Bluedog and calling you out.

I'm with you on this one, Searcher. I smelt a rat from the first post.
People who consistently rant, are rude when asked reasonable questions in a polite manner, make extravagant claims with no supporting evidence, blame others for their own refusal to share info, yet call themselves "researchers"....are not worth the time of day, IMO.
Plus all this rubbish about "retired military" etc etc (again; no evidence).
Few of us here are perfect but I think we can do without that.

MA

[Bluedog]

Yes it looks like Climber the oh so wise Yowie Yoda has moved on!

[Mad Academic]

My request was nothing more or less than what it seemed: a simple request.
But it got the response I was expecting.
Fairly typical disparaging reply; first insult, then offer an offhanded qualification "I am not saying you are either..."
[/quote]

I am sorry you took offence Mad Academic, you don't know what you ask and because your knowledge is limited I didn't want to offend you, when you do have a greater understanding you will agree with my statements, again I mean no offence but you are not our priority, THAY ARE, WE WILL DO NOTHING ON THIS FORUM TO RISK OUR RELATIONSHIP WITH THEM, Climber
[/quote]

"again I mean no offence". he says, as he offends.

"you don't know what you ask and because your knowledge is limited..." Please do go on, O Wise One! I wait to be Enlightened by you.

[Bluedog]

There are 3 possibilities (scenarios) here
1- Climber is telling the truth, has taken offence and thinks we are all full of .

2- Climber fabricated the story and when questioned has realised the game is up?

3-Climber is a past member posting under another name.
If #1 is the case we owe climber an apology (even though I don't believe he has been bullied, only asked to provide something to substantiate his claims, these where reasonable requests)

If either #2 or 3 are the case, we'll what can you say other than that's pretty bloody sad to join a forum to intentionally mislead(Climbers words) and if that's the case I'm glad he was called out.

Again if #1 is the case, Climber please share some evidence and us members who have called you out will be forced to eat humble pie.

But one can't help but wonder if it was all fabricated in a caravan park.

[Yowie bait]

I think we need something from Climber to substantiate his claims.
Maybe he could share a photograph of a footprint or tree structure, maybe attach a audio file.
If he has some evidence to show us it would lend some credibility to his encounters.
The claims that he does not want to share any evidence for fear of upsetting his relationship with his forest friends is quite convenient and I think a bit of a cop out.
Also the fact in quite a few posts Climber has been quite patronising when asked relevant questions regarding his claims.
Here's hoping Climber responds and presents us with something otherwise its all a bit suspect to me!

[sarcasm]I can only assume that his forest friends must have internet access and so regularly visit the AYR forum . . .[/sarcasm]

Well the "forest people" are known as "Trolls" in some parts of the world.

[Searcher]

Yowie bait wrote:

Well the "forest people" are known as "Trolls" in some parts of the world.

Hi Yowie bait,

That's a gem to start 2020 with!

Cheers.