Page 2 of 2

Re: The only primate to have crossed the Wallace line

Posted: Wed Apr 12, 2017 9:28 pm
by paulmcleod67
[quote="Tim*"]Hi Paul

I think the map youre seeing is more than likely a natural formation.

That being said, anomolous rocks have been found. Steve Strong, author of Forgotten Origins, does work in this area and has some compelling examples of chert artifacts. It may be worth handing over to a bloke like Steve for further study?


Yeah Stevens seen it matey and said it was the second most important rock he's looked at. so yeah it's pretty interesting.

Re: The only primate to have crossed the Wallace line

Posted: Wed Apr 12, 2017 9:35 pm
by paulmcleod67
Tim* wrote:Hi Paul

I think the map youre seeing is more than likely a natural formation.

That being said, anomolous rocks have been found. Steve Strong, author of Forgotten Origins, does work in this area and has some compelling examples of chert artifacts. It may be worth handing over to a bloke like Steve for further study?

Tim
Hi mate. Yeah Steven has had a look at the stone and told me it was so important that I was only the second person he had rang personally after receiving an email concerning found weird rocks....I imagine his inbox gets a bit of a hammering lol. He's a nice bloke and gave me some interesting advice about it.

Re: The only primate to have crossed the Wallace line

Posted: Wed Apr 12, 2017 10:05 pm
by paulmcleod67
rodbenfield59 wrote:Hi Paul that was a great read mate but can i through a spanner in there for a second .Aboriginals have been in this country for over 30,000 thousand yrs and proof in aboriginal folk law rock paintings etc of the presents of the hairy man .most will agree this is true ,now what if your theory was reversed and the the hairy folk were here say 30k years before the aboriginal .I summize that the Wallace line was crossed but out of Australia not into and that our hairy folk migrated to the current sighting spots all over the globe /hence Yeti,Yarin,Bigfoot,Sasquatch etc.I am suggesting that when the Australia Aboriginal migrated across to New Guinea up through Asia ,Russia etc and across into Canada and the US oops left out Europe .As the Australian aboriginal migrated with all of its culture it drew the hairy folk along with them.Look at similarities between the natives of Tibet the Eskimo and the American Indian only defined by colour.

Cheers matey, thanks for wading through my long winded posts lol

The aboriginals are recorded in the current archaeological record as arriving in Australia around 60,000 years ago but as I've said above my uneducated (but working on it) guess on a time frame for Yowies appearing in Australia is split down the middle

If they migrated here my bet is via Antarctica at around 400,000 years ago some 340,000 years before the first modern Aboriginals arrived. The Aboriginals oral traditions talk of going to war with what we call the yowie for domination of the continent (Hecktic).

I also have a couple of chook eggs in the upright marsupial, parallel evolution theory. In which they came to Australia via Antarctica 65 million years ago with what would become Australia's modern marsupial populations. The theory allows for their own isolated evolutionary path parallel to bipedal homanids with one exception...they are still a marsupial species. Ergo the Wallace line is not applicable to their arrival in this country. A lot of the really old Yowie stories have some pretty marsupial like characteristics described in the accounts.

What I experienced was....well... primitive in every way... but very cunning. It's really hard to describe a really close brush with a yowie to people that hav'nt had an experience with them. It still scares the s#@t out of me but at the same time I'm hooked on the whole riddle now...probably will be till I die.

Cheers

Re: The only primate to have crossed the Wallace line

Posted: Thu Apr 13, 2017 2:19 am
by Tim*
paulmcleod67 wrote:
Tim* wrote:Hi Paul

I think the map youre seeing is more than likely a natural formation.

That being said, anomolous rocks have been found. Steve Strong, author of Forgotten Origins, does work in this area and has some compelling examples of chert artifacts. It may be worth handing over to a bloke like Steve for further study?

Tim
Hi mate. Yeah Steven has had a look at the stone and told me it was so important that I was only the second person he had rang personally after receiving an email concerning found weird rocks....I imagine his inbox gets a bit of a hammering lol. He's a nice bloke and gave me some interesting advice about it.
Mate I looked again at your pics of chert and realised I didn't see the image showing the lines.
Any chance you could share some info on where it was found? Not the specific location but what the area was like geographically, any other interesting geological anomolies etc

Would love to hear Steves thoughts on it if you care to share (thumb)