Are Bigfoot/Yowies/ Sasquatches Tree Persons ?

[Aussie Denis]

Morning All,

Please bear with me as I'm still finding my way around the site and as I don't do Social Media posting stuff is a challenge for me.
I see from wandering around You Tube when I can't sleep ( like tonight ) that a couple of Guys in The States have started pushing the idea that these things we are investigating are some sort of Tree People. Now while I don't buy the idea I feel any theory should be looked at, discussed and debated after it only takes one train of thought to find a answer. If you look up my first post when I joined awhile back you'll see I had a weird night back in the later 70's that has stuck with me all these years. What ever it was I heard ( but did not see ) had a fair size set of Lungs on it to make the noise it did.
So the Tree People thing don't cut the mustard for me but I figure most of the members here would know a fair bit more than me so hence this post.
Hope to hear your thoughts on this. Cheers, aussie denis, Annandale Qld.

[bassplyr]

I'm thrown by what they mean by saying tree people. if they mean some feral human living in the woods, then im with you and doubt that possibility. obviously there are cases of feral hermits living in the woods or bush but humans can't do much of the things identified with sasquatch or yowies. humans can't break six inch thick trees with the twist of the wrist. and not even Pavoratti on his best days could make vocalizations the volume of these creatures. i can attest to the sheer volume and air displacement they can make. then there are the 16 inch footprints. the largest human
foot measures 15 inches.

I think they are relic hominids of some sort. question is, how'd they get to Australia. they're definitely here, but how?

[Yowie bait]

You must be reffering to Snow walker prime? He has a lot of out there views on the Sasquatch and forest beings .Hes certainly had enough experience.

From what ive seen, they are a type of primitive looking person/caveman type being. Not a basic ape which is the conclusion a lot of researchers have come to. Fair enough from the descriptions from witnesses but yeah a type of man imo and physically superior to us puny humans. The hairy men!

[bassplyr]

im not sure they are cavemen. are there cases of cavemen ranging 7-9 foot tall? I thought human as a genus are getting taller. maybe they hominids but from a divergent line removed from humans by a margin large enough to not be included as cavemen.

maybe something half between human and a gigantopithicus type animal. they retain much of the behaviour of apes and they still possess ape like strength beyond that of what a 8 foot tall human would have. to me, that suggests they unlike humans and their close relatives, still have large neural motor groups. a trait indicative of not being close to the intelligence of humans and incapable of complex hand or vocal articulations. as smart as a chimp or gorilla sure. probably a bit smarter. as smart as cavemen, probably not even
close. able to make a wide array of vocalizations sure. able to speak language with the tonal finesse of a human, no. can build crude structures but proper shelters or real tools I personally doubt it..

for the above speculation I feel they are hominids that evolved apes bu t not from tj e same line as humans or their closest precursors.
but, perhaps from a vestigial line broke off long before cavemenor even homo erectus. I think they evolved similar attributes as humans like bipedal ambulation and behaviour but aren't in our same line.

that being said im just some schmoe on the internet and no expert in any capacity so what do i really know.

[bassplyr]

im not sure they are cavemen. are there cases of cavemen ranging 7-9 foot tall? I thought human as a genus are getting taller. maybe theyre hominids but from a divergent line removed from humans by a margin large enough to not be included as cavemen.

maybe something half between human and a gigantopithicus type animal. they retain much of the behaviour of apes and they still possess ape like strength beyond that of what a 8 foot tall human would have. to me, that suggests they unlike humans and their close relatives, still have large neural motor groups. a trait indicative of not being close to the intelligence of humans and incapable of complex hand or vocal articulations. as smart as a chimp or gorilla sure. probably a bit smarter. as smart as cavemen, probably not even
close. able to make a wide array of vocalizations sure. able to speak language with the tonal finesse of a human, no. can build crude structures, but proper shelters or real tools I personally doubt it..

for the above speculation I feel they are hominids that evolved from apes like humans, but not from the same recent line as humans or their closest precursors.
but, perhaps from a vestigial line that broke off long before cavemen or even homo erectus. I think they evolved similar attributes as humans like bipedal ambulation and behaviour but aren't in our same immediate line.

that being said im just some schmoe on the internet and no expert in any capacity so what do i really know.

[bassplyr]

and i still have no clue how to use the edit function. the prior post was my attempt to fix grammer foibles in my original post. sorry guys

[Wolf]

im not sure they are cavemen. are there cases of cavemen ranging 7-9 foot tall?

Homo denisovan. We only have a few tooth fragments yet scientists 'know' they were around 7'?

I feel they are hominids that evolved apes bu t not from tj e same line as humans or their closest precursors.
but, perhaps from a vestigial line broke off long before cavemenor even homo erectus. I think they evolved similar attributes as humans like bipedal ambulation and behaviour but aren't in our same line.

that being said im just some schmoe on the internet and no expert in any capacity so what do i really know.

Just as plausible as any other explanation. IMO we are of the same line though... which is why we can and have hybridised with them over the centuries... producing the variety of modern human races today.

[Aussie Denis]

You must be reffering to Snow walker prime? He has a lot of out there views on the Sasquatch and forest beings .Hes certainly had enough experience.

From what ive seen, they are a type of primitive looking person/caveman type being. Not a basic ape which is the conclusion a lot of researchers have come to. Fair enough from the descriptions from witnesses but yeah a type of man imo and physically superior to us puny humans. The hairy men!

G'day Yowie bait,

I think you may be correct Snow walker prime sounds familiar. I think that guy is a little weird but then again what's normal ? I tend to agree with thinking it's maybe a " missing link " something between a ape and man or maybe even more animal than human. I can't see any sort of tree/plant having the ability to make the loud noises that are being recorded that was my main reason for not buying the tree people thing.
As I said though, every idea/theory needs testing and discussion as it may just lead to a successful finding of a better idea/theory.
Thanks for the comment. Cheers, Aussie Denis.

[Aussie Denis]

and i still have no clue how to use the edit function. the prior post was my attempt to fix grammer foibles in my original post. sorry guys

G'day bassplyr,

I thought it was a well thought out, interesting reply on the tree people item. I never really bought the idea as my main reason was I couldn't see how anything other a flesh & blood creature could make the noises that are being recorded all over the world.
But as I say every idea/theory needs to be heard, discussed and maybe improved on or proved wrong. It just takes one flash of brilliance sometimes.
Thanks for the comment. Cheers, aussie denis.

[truthseeker73]

I think these creatures are either a long lost link or they are another life form created and put here with us, almost a perfect genetic cross of a seven foot tall human and a silverback genetics with a few lil tweaks like amazing night eye sight, a cameleon style coat, the ability to leave no trace etc