AYR Crew on the History channel

[David]

Analysis by a few American names in research

https://youtu.be/sOEV3Q0fZs0

[Dion]

Strange comment on the video clip.

The heat signatures are people wearing headlamps? lol

[David]

Strange comment on the video clip.

The heat signatures are people wearing headlamps? lol

Skeptical clutching at straws.

[aaq]

But to me, the saggital crest is acknowledged by the headlamper, and they've had to brainstorm something that fits. The credibility of that explanation is zero off course.

They have the neutral video analysis, the token dismissal and the acknowledgement so all three views.

The viewer can then use their brain, however much they have of one, to decide. "Possible yowie" is a soft acknowledgement which is fine IMHO.

[Kel]

This is actually a huge win.

When i first saw it I was initially annoyed by the headlamp thing from the Tik Tok teen and suggestions it may have been a hoax but then I realized that any mainstream media source presenting potentially disruptive information would likely have to put some suggestion of it being a hoax in order to maintain their rights from "TPTB" to delve into such topics and broadcast it ie some form of plausible deniability.

Headlamps though? Not so plausible I would have thought.

This is interesting - we may be seeing some form of soft disclosure happening here.

Watch for more increasingly absurd "plausibly deniable" info being presented ie teenage Tik Tok super expert girl claims Yowie footage is now a weather balloon - then its almost certainly some form of soft disclosure.

If everyone and their dumb brother can see the plausibly deniable aspects being presented are patently absurd then this is a slow and effective way of softly introducing the truth to a blissfully unaware public.

[FNQ yowie]

Headlamps...
OMFG...

[aaq]

This is actually a huge win.

When i first saw it I was initially annoyed by the headlamp thing from the Tik Tok teen and suggestions it may have been a hoax but then I realized that any mainstream media source presenting potentially disruptive information would likely have to put some suggestion of it being a hoax in order to maintain their rights from "TPTB" to delve into such topics and broadcast it ie some form of plausible deniability.

Headlamps though? Not so plausible I would have thought.

This is interesting - we may be seeing some form of soft disclosure happening here.

Watch for more increasingly absurd "plausibly deniable" info being presented ie teenage Tik Tok super expert girl claims Yowie footage is now a weather balloon - then its almost certainly some form of soft disclosure.

If everyone and their dumb brother can see the plausibly deniable aspects being presented are patently absurd then this is a slow and effective way of softly introducing the truth to a blissfully unaware public.

100% agree. Headlamps are so ridiculous the argument becomes staged. I said "soft acknowledgement" but meant disclosure - couldn't think of the word, thanks for the reminder.

[Harry_Henderson]

I can’t believe the BS these so called analytical experts spout. They just don’t want to accept evidence staring them in the face. Human beings are very good at explaining away real hardcore facts that conflict with their narrative.

[Harry_Henderson]

The headlamp explanation is laughably ridiculous. Something that a five year old child might come up with! The History Channel has very little credibility anymore. Just look at some of their recent episodes. It’s all about entertainment and outrageously enticing topics with fiction posing as possible fact. That being said, there is one person worth taking seriously on this episode: The most sensible and intelligent comment is given by anthropologist Kathy Strain.