ThanksNight Walker responds:
December 1st, 2011 at 6:14 pm
The camera work is slick and Harrison’s performance, it must be said, is impressive.

1/There was no "evidence" either way..what part of that does NW not get.If nothing else was known about the actual evidence, circumstances, and personalities involved it would come across as compelling testimony in favour of the Yowie.
2/Circumstances and personalities eh..you mean like the two mad witnesses that you based your own hoax ideas on.
Witness one said he saw the eyes/heard the footsteps and sensed the dread....
Witness 2 claimed the glowing eyes were his because his eyes had cataracts and they glow under torchlight .which then morphed into ....that he was actually a shapeshifter who could be in many places.
It was Mr cataracts shifting through time and space and appearing to everyone in a different location.
Yep..that sure does explain everything as a hoax NW..??????
Oh the shame..a "sceptic" needing the testimony of a teleporting shape shifter.

No explanation from NW...no mention of any of the above..anywhere in NW thousands of posts..nothing..just ..cricket noises..
Now is the time to come clean and apologise for this mendacious obfuscation...
How?Will CFZ or, indeed, anyone else be actually investigating Harrison’s claim?
Is NW being obtuse for more dishonest reasons..or is NW just thick.?
How can anyone investigate a bunch of fascinating anecdotes Mr Holmes.?
Thanks..its legit..we agreeIf genuine, Harrison’s encounter would bring the Yowie into the spotlight as a legitimate subject of study.
Sweet baby Jesus..Can this guy get anything right.?(note: the interviewer is an old friend of Harrison’s from before their involvement in cryptozoology)

I had never met my "old friend" before the flipping Cryptoconference in 2001.