New footage of BF? Real or fake?
-
Wolf
- Long Time Contributor
- Posts: 1572
- Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2016 10:46 pm
- Position: Artist
- Facebook Profile Page: https://www.facebook.com/groups/266070257413290/
- Contact:
New footage of BF? Real or fake?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D3xj_OdyRtE
The mightiest oak was once a nut that stood his ground https://www.sasquatchstories.com
-
donjoman
- Bronze Status
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2013 8:31 pm
Re: New footage of BF? Real or fake?
as per the Youtube comments... hell fake
-
Shazzoir
- Long Time Contributor
- Posts: 1236
- Joined: Sat Nov 19, 2005 12:40 pm
- Position: Crypto Enthusiast
- Gender: Female
- Location: Brisbane, Qld
Re: New footage of BF? Real or fake?
It looks as if it is concentrating fairly hard on looking where it is going, and where it is placing it's feet.... as you would imagine if it's someone in a suit who can't see clearly. It also looks uniformly black, no other colour from natural fading of hair, anywhere, so add my opinion of 'Fake'.
Shazz
Shazz
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Dr. Carl Sagan
-
TrevorPeters
- Silver Status
- Posts: 236
- Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2016 10:06 am
- Position: Believer
- Location: Ipswich. Qld
Re: New footage of BF? Real or fake?
Body mechanics look a little like the Freeman footage and it seems bulky enough.
Unfortunately, you can't see below mid-thigh due to grass, the hiker never zooms in very much at all (limitation of equipment?), resolution sucks and he then bugs out instead of perhaps following it, which he could have made an attempt at considering the slow pace of the subject. All too questionable. I would never present this as evidence because the doubt/hoax factor cannot be discounted.
Unfortunately, you can't see below mid-thigh due to grass, the hiker never zooms in very much at all (limitation of equipment?), resolution sucks and he then bugs out instead of perhaps following it, which he could have made an attempt at considering the slow pace of the subject. All too questionable. I would never present this as evidence because the doubt/hoax factor cannot be discounted.